The Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.8 4区医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-04-03 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/7630594

Siyi Li, Xiankun Chen, Huachen Jiao, Yan Li, Guanghui Pan, Xue Yitao

{"title":"The Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Siyi Li, Xiankun Chen, Huachen Jiao, Yan Li, Guanghui Pan, Xue Yitao","doi":"10.1155/2023/7630594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The optimal exercise prescription for coronary artery disease (CAD) remains under debate. The aim of our meta-analysis is to investigate the efficacy of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) of coronary artery disease patients.Methods: Electronic databases were searched from their inception date until October 23, 2021, and the articles include randomized controlled trials. The mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 test.Results: The study standards were met by seventeen studies. The pooled studies included 902 patients. HIIT resulted in improvement in peak oxygen uptake (1.50 ml/kg/min, 95% confidence interval: 0.48 to 2.53, n = 853 patients, and low quality evidence) compared with MICT. There was no discernible difference between the individuals in the HIIT group and the MICT group in terms of systolic/diastolic blood pressure or peak/resting heart rate.Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis reported the superiority of HIIT versus MICT in enhancing peak oxygen uptake in CAD patients.","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7630594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal exercise prescription for coronary artery disease (CAD) remains under debate. The aim of our meta-analysis is to investigate the efficacy of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) of coronary artery disease patients.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched from their inception date until October 23, 2021, and the articles include randomized controlled trials. The mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I ² test.

Results: The study standards were met by seventeen studies. The pooled studies included 902 patients. HIIT resulted in improvement in peak oxygen uptake (1.50 ml/kg/min, 95% confidence interval: 0.48 to 2.53, n = 853 patients, and low quality evidence) compared with MICT. There was no discernible difference between the individuals in the HIIT group and the MICT group in terms of systolic/diastolic blood pressure or peak/resting heart rate.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis reported the superiority of HIIT versus MICT in enhancing peak oxygen uptake in CAD patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

高强度间歇训练对冠心病患者运动能力的影响：系统回顾与元分析》。

背景：冠状动脉疾病（CAD）的最佳运动处方仍存在争议。我们的荟萃分析旨在研究高强度间歇训练（HIIT）与中等强度持续训练（MICT）对冠心病患者的疗效：方法：对电子数据库进行检索，检索时间从开始检索之日起至 2021 年 10 月 23 日，检索文章包括随机对照试验。计算了平均差异和 95% 的置信区间，并使用 I 2 检验评估了异质性：17项研究符合研究标准。汇总研究包括 902 名患者。与 MICT 相比，HIIT 可改善峰值摄氧量（1.50 毫升/千克/分钟，95% 置信区间：0.48 至 2.53，n = 853 名患者，低质量证据）。在收缩压/舒张压或峰值/静息心率方面，HIIT 组与 MICT 组之间没有明显差异：本系统综述和荟萃分析报告了 HIIT 与 MICT 在提高 CAD 患者峰值摄氧量方面的优越性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

13 weeks

期刊介绍： Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.