Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perceptions of Palliative Care that Influence Access and Use: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1177/10499091231185344
Kim Slusser, Roque Anthony F Velasco, Heather Coats
{"title":"Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perceptions of Palliative Care that Influence Access and Use: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.","authors":"Kim Slusser, Roque Anthony F Velasco, Heather Coats","doi":"10.1177/10499091231185344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Benefits of integration of palliative care early in the trajectory of a patient's serious illness are well established in the literature. Yet, barriers to palliative care access in the US continue to exist. The purpose of this study is to synthesize existing qualitative data of patient, caregiver, and clinician perceptions of palliative care (PC) that influence PC access and use in the US. <b>Methods:</b> A formal qualitative meta-synthesis was completed. The meta-synthesis included 1) a systematic literature search of qualitative studies conducted from 2016 to 2021, 2) a critical appraisal of the included studies, and 3) a reciprocal translation of the study's findings through an interpretive thematic analysis. <b>Results:</b> Seven articles met inclusion criteria resulting in a sample size of patients (n=18), caregivers (n=15), and clinicians (n=118). Three themes emerged with associated subthemes: knowledge and opinions of PC (subthemes of patient and caregiver knowledge and awareness and clinician knowledge and beliefs); care coordination and collaboration (subthemes of communication and trust); and social and structural drivers (subthemes of socioeconomic demographics and time and resources). <b>Conclusions:</b> This qualitative meta-synthesis identifies barriers and facilitators to palliative care access and use. The study findings illuminate the commonalities and differences of the perceptions of the three key stakeholder groups. In addition, this qualitative meta-synthesis reveals the complexities within the US healthcare system, and the challenges patients and their caregivers face accessing PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"452-464"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231185344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Benefits of integration of palliative care early in the trajectory of a patient's serious illness are well established in the literature. Yet, barriers to palliative care access in the US continue to exist. The purpose of this study is to synthesize existing qualitative data of patient, caregiver, and clinician perceptions of palliative care (PC) that influence PC access and use in the US. Methods: A formal qualitative meta-synthesis was completed. The meta-synthesis included 1) a systematic literature search of qualitative studies conducted from 2016 to 2021, 2) a critical appraisal of the included studies, and 3) a reciprocal translation of the study's findings through an interpretive thematic analysis. Results: Seven articles met inclusion criteria resulting in a sample size of patients (n=18), caregivers (n=15), and clinicians (n=118). Three themes emerged with associated subthemes: knowledge and opinions of PC (subthemes of patient and caregiver knowledge and awareness and clinician knowledge and beliefs); care coordination and collaboration (subthemes of communication and trust); and social and structural drivers (subthemes of socioeconomic demographics and time and resources). Conclusions: This qualitative meta-synthesis identifies barriers and facilitators to palliative care access and use. The study findings illuminate the commonalities and differences of the perceptions of the three key stakeholder groups. In addition, this qualitative meta-synthesis reveals the complexities within the US healthcare system, and the challenges patients and their caregivers face accessing PC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者、护理者和临床医生对影响姑息关怀获取和使用的看法:定性元综合。
目的:在患者罹患重病的早期整合姑息关怀的益处已在文献中得到充分证实。然而,在美国,姑息关怀的使用仍然存在障碍。本研究的目的是综合现有的定性数据,了解患者、护理者和临床医生对姑息关怀(PC)的看法,这些看法影响了姑息关怀在美国的普及和使用。研究方法:完成了一项正式的定性元综合。元综合包括:1)对 2016 年至 2021 年进行的定性研究进行系统的文献检索;2)对纳入的研究进行批判性评估;3)通过解释性主题分析对研究结果进行相互转换。研究结果七篇文章符合纳入标准,样本量包括患者(18 人)、护理人员(15 人)和临床医生(118 人)。出现了三个主题及相关副主题:对 PC 的了解和看法(副主题为患者和护理者的知识和意识以及临床医生的知识和信念);护理协调与合作(副主题为沟通和信任);以及社会和结构驱动因素(副主题为社会经济人口统计学以及时间和资源)。结论:这项定性荟萃研究确定了姑息关怀获取和使用的障碍和促进因素。研究结果阐明了三个主要利益相关者群体在认知上的共性和差异。此外,本定性综述还揭示了美国医疗保健系统的复杂性,以及患者及其照护者在获取姑息关怀服务时所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Perceptions of Families and Nurses After Signing a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order for Patients in Respiratory Care Wards Differences in Timely Goals of Care Discussions in Nursing Homes Among Black Residents A Way Forward for Comprehensive Cancer Caregiver Support Development of a Hospice Perceptions Instrument for Diverse Patients and Families: Establishing Content and Face Validity Antibiotics at End of Life: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1