Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Association With Cardiac Care: A Systematic Review.

Ginger Y Jiang, John W Urwin, Jason H Wasfy
{"title":"Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Association With Cardiac Care: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ginger Y Jiang,&nbsp;John W Urwin,&nbsp;Jason H Wasfy","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of the Affordable Care Act was to improve health outcomes through expanding insurance, including through Medicaid expansion. We systematically reviewed the available literature on the association of Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion with cardiac outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consistent with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed systematic searches in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature using the keywords such as Medicaid expansion and cardiac, cardiovascular, or heart to identify titles published from 1/2014 to 7/2022 that evaluated the association between Medicaid expansion and cardiac outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 14 studies (47%) used a difference-in-difference study design and 10 (33%) used a multiple time series design. The median number of postexpansion years evaluated was 2 (range, 0.5-6) and the median number of expansion states included was 23 (range, 1-33). Commonly assessed outcomes included insurance coverage of and utilization of cardiac treatments (25.0%), morbidity/mortality (19.6%), disparities in care (14.3%), and preventive care (41.1%). Medicaid expansion was generally associated with increased insurance coverage, reduction in overall cardiac morbidity/mortality outside of acute care settings, and some increase in screening for and treatment of cardiac comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current literature demonstrates that Medicaid expansion was generally associated with increased insurance coverage of cardiac treatments, improvement in cardiac outcomes outside of acute care settings, and some improvements in cardiac-focused prevention and screening. Conclusions are limited because quasi-experimental comparisons of expansion and nonexpansion states cannot account for unmeasured state-level confounders.</p>","PeriodicalId":10301,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":"16 6","pages":"e009753"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009753","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The goal of the Affordable Care Act was to improve health outcomes through expanding insurance, including through Medicaid expansion. We systematically reviewed the available literature on the association of Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion with cardiac outcomes.

Methods: Consistent with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed systematic searches in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature using the keywords such as Medicaid expansion and cardiac, cardiovascular, or heart to identify titles published from 1/2014 to 7/2022 that evaluated the association between Medicaid expansion and cardiac outcomes.

Results: A total of 30 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 14 studies (47%) used a difference-in-difference study design and 10 (33%) used a multiple time series design. The median number of postexpansion years evaluated was 2 (range, 0.5-6) and the median number of expansion states included was 23 (range, 1-33). Commonly assessed outcomes included insurance coverage of and utilization of cardiac treatments (25.0%), morbidity/mortality (19.6%), disparities in care (14.3%), and preventive care (41.1%). Medicaid expansion was generally associated with increased insurance coverage, reduction in overall cardiac morbidity/mortality outside of acute care settings, and some increase in screening for and treatment of cardiac comorbidities.

Conclusions: Current literature demonstrates that Medicaid expansion was generally associated with increased insurance coverage of cardiac treatments, improvement in cardiac outcomes outside of acute care settings, and some improvements in cardiac-focused prevention and screening. Conclusions are limited because quasi-experimental comparisons of expansion and nonexpansion states cannot account for unmeasured state-level confounders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《平价医疗法案》下的医疗补助扩张与心脏护理:系统回顾。
背景:《平价医疗法案》的目标是通过扩大保险,包括扩大医疗补助,来改善健康状况。我们系统地回顾了可获得的关于《平价医疗法案》医疗补助扩大与心脏预后之间关系的文献。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,我们在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和护理和联合健康文献累积索引中进行了系统搜索,使用关键词如Medicaid扩展和心脏、心血管或心脏,以确定2014年1月至2022年7月发表的评估Medicaid扩展与心脏结局之间关系的标题。结果:共有30项研究符合纳入和排除标准。其中,14项研究(47%)采用差异中差异研究设计,10项研究(33%)采用多时间序列设计。扩展后评估的中位数为2年(范围0.5-6),扩展状态的中位数为23(范围1-33)。通常评估的结果包括心脏治疗的保险覆盖率和使用率(25.0%)、发病率/死亡率(19.6%)、护理差异(14.3%)和预防性护理(41.1%)。医疗补助的扩大通常与保险覆盖范围的增加、急性护理环境外总体心脏病发病率/死亡率的降低以及心脏合并症的筛查和治疗的增加有关。结论:目前的文献表明,医疗补助的扩大通常与心脏治疗保险覆盖范围的增加、急性护理环境外心脏结局的改善以及心脏预防和筛查的一些改善有关。结论是有限的,因为膨胀和非膨胀状态的准实验比较不能解释未测量的状态级混杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Life's Essential 8 Cardiovascular Health Metrics With Cardiovascular Events in the Cardiovascular Disease Lifetime Risk Pooling Project. Clinician Decision Support Tools: Advances in Lipid-Lowering Treatment Intensification. Beyond the Methods: Economic Stability and Cardiovascular Health. Mapping Geographic Proximity to Cardiologists Across the United States. Determinants and Outcomes Associated With Skilled Nursing Facility Use After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Statewide Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1