A Perfect Storm to Set the Stage for Ontological Exploration: Response to Commentaries on “Emotional Well-Being: What It Is and Why It Matters”

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Affective science Pub Date : 2022-12-14 DOI:10.1007/s42761-022-00169-8

Crystal L. Park, Laura D. Kubzansky, Sandra M. Chafouleas, Richard J. Davidson, Dacher Keltner, Parisa Parsafar, Yeates Conwell, Michelle Y. Martin, Janel Hanmer, Kuan Hong Wang

{"title":"A Perfect Storm to Set the Stage for Ontological Exploration: Response to Commentaries on “Emotional Well-Being: What It Is and Why It Matters”","authors":"Crystal L. Park, Laura D. Kubzansky, Sandra M. Chafouleas, Richard J. Davidson, Dacher Keltner, Parisa Parsafar, Yeates Conwell, Michelle Y. Martin, Janel Hanmer, Kuan Hong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s42761-022-00169-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>Our target article (Park et al., this issue) described the process of developing a provisional conceptualization of emotional well-being (EWB). In that article, we considered strengths and gaps in current perspectives on a variety of related concepts and ways that the proposed conceptualization of EWB informs our evaluation of measures and methods of assessment and identification of its causes and consequences. We concluded with recommendations for moving the framework and the field forward. Eight rich, thoughtful, and highly engaged commentaries addressed the target article. Collectively, these commentaries illustrate both points of consensus and areas of substantial disagreement, providing a potential roadmap for continued work. In this response, we summarize key issues raised and highlight those points raised by multiple commentators or that we considered seminal to advancing future discussion and research.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"4 1","pages":"52 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-022-00169-8.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-022-00169-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Our target article (Park et al., this issue) described the process of developing a provisional conceptualization of emotional well-being (EWB). In that article, we considered strengths and gaps in current perspectives on a variety of related concepts and ways that the proposed conceptualization of EWB informs our evaluation of measures and methods of assessment and identification of its causes and consequences. We concluded with recommendations for moving the framework and the field forward. Eight rich, thoughtful, and highly engaged commentaries addressed the target article. Collectively, these commentaries illustrate both points of consensus and areas of substantial disagreement, providing a potential roadmap for continued work. In this response, we summarize key issues raised and highlight those points raised by multiple commentators or that we considered seminal to advancing future discussion and research.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

为本体论探索搭建舞台的完美风暴：对“情感幸福：它是什么以及为什么重要”评论的回应。

我们的目标文章（Park等人，本期）描述了情绪幸福感（EWB）临时概念化的发展过程。在那篇文章中，我们考虑了当前对各种相关概念的看法的优势和差距，以及拟议的EWB概念化为我们评估措施和方法以及确定其原因和后果提供了信息。最后，我们提出了推动该框架和该领域向前发展的建议。八篇内容丰富、深思熟虑、高度参与的评论文章针对目标文章。总之，这些评论说明了共识点和实质性分歧领域，为继续开展工作提供了潜在的路线图。在这篇回应中，我们总结了提出的关键问题，并强调了多位评论员提出的或我们认为对推进未来讨论和研究具有开创性意义的观点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Affective science

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量