Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI).

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1080/16506073.2022.2153077
Fara F Tabrizi, Andreas B Larsson, Hampus Grönvall, Lux Söderstrand, Ellen Hallén, Marie-France Champoux-Larsson, Tobias Lundgren, Felicia Sundström, Amani Lavefjord, Monica Buhrman, Örjan Sundin, Lance McCracken, Fredrik Åhs, Billy Jansson
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI).","authors":"Fara F Tabrizi,&nbsp;Andreas B Larsson,&nbsp;Hampus Grönvall,&nbsp;Lux Söderstrand,&nbsp;Ellen Hallén,&nbsp;Marie-France Champoux-Larsson,&nbsp;Tobias Lundgren,&nbsp;Felicia Sundström,&nbsp;Amani Lavefjord,&nbsp;Monica Buhrman,&nbsp;Örjan Sundin,&nbsp;Lance McCracken,&nbsp;Fredrik Åhs,&nbsp;Billy Jansson","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2022.2153077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychiatric disorders are common, and reliable measures are crucial for research and clinical practice. A cross-diagnostic construct that can be used to index treatment outcomes as well as prevalence of psychological ill health is psychological flexibility. The aim of this study was to validate a Swedish version of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). The MPFI has 12 subscales, six of which measure flexibility, and six that measure inflexibility. Using confirmatory factor analysis in a community sample of 670 participants, we found that a model with two higher order factors had satisfactory fit (CFI = .933) and a 12-factor model had the best fit to the data (CFI = .955). All 12 subscales showed adequate reliability (CRs = .803-.933) and the factor structure was similar across age groups and gender. Findings suggest that the Swedish version of the MPFI is a reliable instrument that can be used to index psychological flexibility. Potential areas for improvement of the instrument are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2022.2153077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Psychiatric disorders are common, and reliable measures are crucial for research and clinical practice. A cross-diagnostic construct that can be used to index treatment outcomes as well as prevalence of psychological ill health is psychological flexibility. The aim of this study was to validate a Swedish version of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). The MPFI has 12 subscales, six of which measure flexibility, and six that measure inflexibility. Using confirmatory factor analysis in a community sample of 670 participants, we found that a model with two higher order factors had satisfactory fit (CFI = .933) and a 12-factor model had the best fit to the data (CFI = .955). All 12 subscales showed adequate reliability (CRs = .803-.933) and the factor structure was similar across age groups and gender. Findings suggest that the Swedish version of the MPFI is a reliable instrument that can be used to index psychological flexibility. Potential areas for improvement of the instrument are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典多维心理灵活性量表(MPFI)的心理测量学评价。
精神疾病很常见,可靠的措施对研究和临床实践至关重要。一个交叉诊断结构,可用于索引治疗结果以及心理疾病的患病率是心理灵活性。本研究的目的是验证瑞典版多维心理灵活性量表(MPFI)。MPFI有12个子量表,其中6个衡量灵活性,6个衡量不灵活性。通过对社区670名参与者的验证性因子分析,我们发现具有两个高阶因子的模型具有令人满意的拟合(CFI = .933),而具有12个因子的模型具有最佳的拟合(CFI = .955)。12个分量表均具有足够的信度(CRs = .803 ~ .933),各年龄组和性别的因素结构相似。研究结果表明,瑞典版MPFI是一种可靠的工具,可以用来衡量心理灵活性。讨论了仪器可能改进的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
期刊最新文献
My grief app for prolonged grief in bereaved parents: a randomised waitlist-controlled trial. Putative risk and resiliency factors after an augmented training program for preventing posttraumatic stress injuries among public safety personnel from diverse sectors. Psychological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. An online self-guided cognitive intervention for unwanted intrusive thoughts about harming infants in new parents: initial randomised controlled trial with mediation analysis. Stamp Out Stigma: a national campaign to decrease stigma and increase behavioral health in fire service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1