Laboratory testing for mitochondrial diseases: biomarkers for diagnosis and follow-up.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1080/10408363.2023.2166013
Abraham J Paredes-Fuentes, Clara Oliva, Roser Urreizti, Delia Yubero, Rafael Artuch
{"title":"Laboratory testing for mitochondrial diseases: biomarkers for diagnosis and follow-up.","authors":"Abraham J Paredes-Fuentes,&nbsp;Clara Oliva,&nbsp;Roser Urreizti,&nbsp;Delia Yubero,&nbsp;Rafael Artuch","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2023.2166013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The currently available biomarkers generally lack the specificity and sensitivity needed for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with mitochondrial diseases (MDs). In this group of rare genetic disorders (mutations in approximately 350 genes associated with MDs), all clinical presentations, ages of disease onset and inheritance types are possible. Blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid surrogates are well-established biomarkers that are used in clinical practice to assess MD. One of the main challenges is validating specific and sensitive biomarkers for the diagnosis of disease and prediction of disease progression. Profiling of lactate, amino acids, organic acids, and acylcarnitine species is routinely conducted to assess MD patients. New biomarkers, including some proteins and circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA, with increased diagnostic specificity have been identified in the last decade and have been proposed as potentially useful in the assessment of clinical outcomes. Despite these advances, even these new biomarkers are not sufficiently specific and sensitive to assess MD progression, and new biomarkers that indicate MD progression are urgently needed to monitor the success of novel therapeutic strategies. In this report, we review the mitochondrial biomarkers that are currently analyzed in clinical laboratories, new biomarkers, an overview of the most common laboratory diagnostic techniques, and future directions regarding targeted versus untargeted metabolomic and genomic approaches in the clinical laboratory setting. Brief descriptions of the current methodologies are also provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":"60 4","pages":"270-289"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2023.2166013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The currently available biomarkers generally lack the specificity and sensitivity needed for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with mitochondrial diseases (MDs). In this group of rare genetic disorders (mutations in approximately 350 genes associated with MDs), all clinical presentations, ages of disease onset and inheritance types are possible. Blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid surrogates are well-established biomarkers that are used in clinical practice to assess MD. One of the main challenges is validating specific and sensitive biomarkers for the diagnosis of disease and prediction of disease progression. Profiling of lactate, amino acids, organic acids, and acylcarnitine species is routinely conducted to assess MD patients. New biomarkers, including some proteins and circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA, with increased diagnostic specificity have been identified in the last decade and have been proposed as potentially useful in the assessment of clinical outcomes. Despite these advances, even these new biomarkers are not sufficiently specific and sensitive to assess MD progression, and new biomarkers that indicate MD progression are urgently needed to monitor the success of novel therapeutic strategies. In this report, we review the mitochondrial biomarkers that are currently analyzed in clinical laboratories, new biomarkers, an overview of the most common laboratory diagnostic techniques, and future directions regarding targeted versus untargeted metabolomic and genomic approaches in the clinical laboratory setting. Brief descriptions of the current methodologies are also provided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
线粒体疾病的实验室检测:诊断和随访的生物标志物。
目前可用的生物标志物通常缺乏诊断和随访线粒体疾病(MDs)患者所需的特异性和敏感性。在这组罕见的遗传性疾病(大约350个与MDs相关的基因突变)中,所有的临床表现、发病年龄和遗传类型都是可能的。血液、尿液和脑脊液替代品是临床实践中用于评估MD的成熟生物标志物。主要挑战之一是验证用于疾病诊断和疾病进展预测的特异性和敏感性生物标志物。乳酸、氨基酸、有机酸和酰基肉碱的谱分析是评估MD患者的常规方法。在过去的十年中,新的生物标志物,包括一些蛋白质和循环无细胞线粒体DNA,已经被发现具有更高的诊断特异性,并被认为在临床结果评估中具有潜在的用途。尽管取得了这些进展,但即使是这些新的生物标志物也不足以特异性和敏感性来评估MD的进展,并且迫切需要新的生物标志物来监测新的治疗策略的成功。在本报告中,我们回顾了目前在临床实验室中分析的线粒体生物标志物,新的生物标志物,最常见的实验室诊断技术的概述,以及临床实验室环境中靶向与非靶向代谢组学和基因组学方法的未来方向。还提供了对当前方法的简要说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling Parkinson's disease through biomarker research: current insights and future prospects. Research progress of KL-6 in respiratory system diseases. The role of immunophenotyping in common variable immunodeficiency: a narrative review. KIF2C/MCAK a prognostic biomarker and its oncogenic potential in malignant progression, and prognosis of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis as biomarker. Extracellular vesicles in cancer: challenges and opportunities for clinical laboratories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1