Retention and Turnover of Social Workers in China: Experimental Evidence from Beijing.

IF 1.4 Journal of evidence-based social work (2019) Pub Date : 2023-11-02 Epub Date: 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1080/26408066.2023.2230224
Zhengyi Dong, Lun Yang
{"title":"Retention and Turnover of Social Workers in China: Experimental Evidence from Beijing.","authors":"Zhengyi Dong, Lun Yang","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2023.2230224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify the critical factors that influenced the turnover and retention of social workers and to propose strategies for enhancing professional social work teams.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) method was employed to approach to assess social workers' preferences regarding both income-related and non-income-related factors affecting their willingness to remain or leave their positions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both income-related and non-income-related measures significantly affected social workers' the willingness to retain in their roles. Specifically, increasing the base salary had a stronger effect compared to performance pay. Among the non-income factors, providing career development opportunities had the strongest effect, followed by improving management, while honors had the weakest effect. Furthermore, it was observed that the effects of these improvements varied depending on the social workers' backgrounds and the types of social work clubs they were associated with. For instance, promoting career development was found to be more effective in well-developed clubs, while income incentives appeared to be more impactful in less developed clubs.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The study highlighted the importance of both income-related measures and non-income factors in addressing the issue of turnover and promoting stability within professional social work teams. Additionally, the observed heterogeneity in the effects of these improvements emphasized the need for tailored retention strategies that consider the diverse backgrounds of social workers and the specific organizational contexts they operate in.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"868-880"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2023.2230224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify the critical factors that influenced the turnover and retention of social workers and to propose strategies for enhancing professional social work teams.

Method: A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) method was employed to approach to assess social workers' preferences regarding both income-related and non-income-related factors affecting their willingness to remain or leave their positions.

Results: Both income-related and non-income-related measures significantly affected social workers' the willingness to retain in their roles. Specifically, increasing the base salary had a stronger effect compared to performance pay. Among the non-income factors, providing career development opportunities had the strongest effect, followed by improving management, while honors had the weakest effect. Furthermore, it was observed that the effects of these improvements varied depending on the social workers' backgrounds and the types of social work clubs they were associated with. For instance, promoting career development was found to be more effective in well-developed clubs, while income incentives appeared to be more impactful in less developed clubs.

Discussion and conclusion: The study highlighted the importance of both income-related measures and non-income factors in addressing the issue of turnover and promoting stability within professional social work teams. Additionally, the observed heterogeneity in the effects of these improvements emphasized the need for tailored retention strategies that consider the diverse backgrounds of social workers and the specific organizational contexts they operate in.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国社会工作者的保留与流动:来自北京的实验证据。
目的:本研究旨在确定影响社会工作者离职和留任的关键因素,并提出加强专业社会工作团队的策略。方法:采用离散选择实验(DCE)方法评估社会工作者对影响其留任或离职意愿的收入相关和非收入相关因素的偏好。结果:与收入相关和非收入相关的指标都显著影响社会工作者保留其角色的意愿。具体而言,与绩效工资相比,提高基本工资的效果更强。在非收入因素中,提供职业发展机会的作用最强,其次是改善管理,而荣誉的作用最弱。此外,据观察,这些改进的效果因社会工作者的背景和他们所属的社会工作俱乐部的类型而异。例如,促进职业发展在发达俱乐部更有效,而收入激励在欠发达俱乐部似乎更具影响力。讨论和结论:该研究强调了与收入相关的措施和非收入因素在解决人员流动问题和促进专业社会工作团队稳定方面的重要性。此外,观察到的这些改进效果的异质性强调了量身定制的保留策略的必要性,该策略考虑了社会工作者的不同背景和他们所处的特定组织环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Student Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: Challenges, Opportunities, and Societal Implications. Clinical Social Workers' Perceptions of Large Language Models in Practice: Resistance to Automation and Prospects for Integration. Can a Large Language Model Judge a Child's Statement?: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Human Experts in Credibility Assessment. Social Work in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A rights-Based Framework for evidence-Based Practice Through Social Psychology, Group Dynamics, and Institutional Analysis. Refusing to Fall Behind: The Ethical Obligation to Embrace AI in Mental Health Social Work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1