Long-term prognosis and emergency management for patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: the EMERGE-ICD study.

Coral Suero, Alfonso Martín, Blanca Coll-Vinent, Esteban González-Torrecilla, José Ormaetxe, Miguel Álvarez, Carmen Del Arco, Manuel Cancio, Mercedes Varona, Susana Sánchez, Juan Sánchez, Ignacio Fernández-Lozano, Fernando Arribas, María Martín-Méndez, Rafael Peinado
{"title":"Long-term prognosis and emergency management for patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: the EMERGE-ICD study.","authors":"Coral Suero, Alfonso Martín, Blanca Coll-Vinent, Esteban González-Torrecilla, José Ormaetxe, Miguel Álvarez, Carmen Del Arco, Manuel Cancio, Mercedes Varona, Susana Sánchez, Juan Sánchez, Ignacio Fernández-Lozano, Fernando Arribas, María Martín-Méndez, Rafael Peinado","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are at risk of serious complications that are often treated in hospital emergency departments (EDs). The EMERG-ICD study (Emergency Department Management and Long-term Prognosis for Patients with ICDs) analysed management and long-term prognosis of ED patients with an ICD after an acute clinical event.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Observational multicenter cohort study including consecutive adult patients with ICDs who came to 27 hospital EDs in Spain for treatment and were followed for 10 years. We collected clinical variables on presentation, ED case management variables, and the date and cause of death in each case. The primary outcome variable was all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-hundred three patients were studied; 471 had structural heart disease (SHD) and 32 had primary electrical heart disease (PEHD). Beta-blockers were prescribed in the ED for 55% of the patients for whom they were indicated. Twenty-four (4.8%), 75 (15.7%), and 368 (73.2%) patients died during follow-up at 1 month, 1 year, and 10 years, respectively. Of these, 363 (77.1%) had SHD and 5 (15.6%) had PEHD (hazard ratio, 8.05 (95% CI, 3.33- 19.46). Among patients with SHD, the cause of death was cardiovascular in 66%. Mortality correlated significantly with seeking care for cardiovascular symptoms, advanced age, male sex, diabetes, a New York Heart Association score of 2 or more, severe ventricular dysfunction, and long-term amiodarone therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prognosis after an acute clinical event is poor in patients with SHD and ICDs, mainly due to cardiovascular causes, especially among patients with associated comorbidities and cardiovascular complaints. Mortality is lower in patients with PEHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11644,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":"35 3","pages":"185-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are at risk of serious complications that are often treated in hospital emergency departments (EDs). The EMERG-ICD study (Emergency Department Management and Long-term Prognosis for Patients with ICDs) analysed management and long-term prognosis of ED patients with an ICD after an acute clinical event.

Material and methods: Observational multicenter cohort study including consecutive adult patients with ICDs who came to 27 hospital EDs in Spain for treatment and were followed for 10 years. We collected clinical variables on presentation, ED case management variables, and the date and cause of death in each case. The primary outcome variable was all-cause mortality.

Results: Five-hundred three patients were studied; 471 had structural heart disease (SHD) and 32 had primary electrical heart disease (PEHD). Beta-blockers were prescribed in the ED for 55% of the patients for whom they were indicated. Twenty-four (4.8%), 75 (15.7%), and 368 (73.2%) patients died during follow-up at 1 month, 1 year, and 10 years, respectively. Of these, 363 (77.1%) had SHD and 5 (15.6%) had PEHD (hazard ratio, 8.05 (95% CI, 3.33- 19.46). Among patients with SHD, the cause of death was cardiovascular in 66%. Mortality correlated significantly with seeking care for cardiovascular symptoms, advanced age, male sex, diabetes, a New York Heart Association score of 2 or more, severe ventricular dysfunction, and long-term amiodarone therapy.

Conclusion: Prognosis after an acute clinical event is poor in patients with SHD and ICDs, mainly due to cardiovascular causes, especially among patients with associated comorbidities and cardiovascular complaints. Mortality is lower in patients with PEHD.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植入式心律转复除颤器患者的长期预后和急救管理:EMERGE-ICD 研究。
目的:植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)患者有发生严重并发症的风险,通常在医院急诊科(ED)接受治疗。EMERG-ICD研究(急诊科ICD患者的管理和长期预后)分析了急诊科ICD患者在急性临床事件后的管理和长期预后:观察性多中心队列研究,包括前往西班牙 27 家医院急诊科接受治疗的连续成年 ICD 患者,并对其进行为期 10 年的随访。我们收集了每个病例发病时的临床变量、急诊室病例管理变量以及死亡日期和原因。主要结果变量为全因死亡率:研究共涉及 53 名患者,其中 471 人患有结构性心脏病 (SHD),32 人患有原发性电击性心脏病 (PEHD)。急诊室为 55% 的患者开具了β-受体阻滞剂处方。分别有 24 名(4.8%)、75 名(15.7%)和 368 名(73.2%)患者在随访 1 个月、1 年和 10 年期间死亡。其中,363 人(77.1%)患有 SHD,5 人(15.6%)患有 PEHD(危险比为 8.05(95% CI,3.33-19.46))。在 SHD 患者中,66% 的死因是心血管疾病。死亡率与心血管症状就诊、高龄、男性、糖尿病、纽约心脏协会评分2分或以上、严重心室功能障碍和长期胺碘酮治疗有明显相关性:结论:患有 SHD 和 ICD 的患者发生急性临床事件后的预后较差,主要是由于心血管原因,尤其是伴有合并症和心血管主诉的患者。PEHD患者的死亡率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A pioneering Spanish book on psychiatric emergencies from 1928, by César Juarros. Rapunzel syndrome in the emergency department. Complexity of care in the emergency department: Shall we treat the whole person to prevent revisits? Considerations regarding the use of the sex/gender variable in research: moving towards good practice. Progenders decalogue. We must be doing something right.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1