Stakes of Assessments in Residency: Influence on Previous and Current Self-Regulated Learning and Co-Regulated Learning in Early Career Specialists.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Perspectives on Medical Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5334/pme.860
Indra Ganesan, Breana Cham, Pim W Teunissen, Jamiu O Busari
{"title":"Stakes of Assessments in Residency: Influence on Previous and Current Self-Regulated Learning and Co-Regulated Learning in Early Career Specialists.","authors":"Indra Ganesan,&nbsp;Breana Cham,&nbsp;Pim W Teunissen,&nbsp;Jamiu O Busari","doi":"10.5334/pme.860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessments drive learning but the influence of the stakes of the assessments on self-regulated (SRL) during and after residency are unknown. As early career specialists (ECS) must continue learning independently, the answer to this is important as it may inform future assessments with the potential to promote life-long learning after graduation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized constructivist grounded theory to explore the perspectives of eighteen ECS on the influence of stakes of assessments within residency on their SRL during training and in current practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We initially set out to examine the influence of the stakes of assessments on SRL during residency and after graduation. However, it was apparent that learners increasingly engaged with others in co-regulated learning (CRL) as the perceived stakes of the assessments increased. The individual learner's SRL was embedded in CRL in preparation for the various assessments in residency. For low-stakes assessments, the learner engaged in less CRL, taking less cues from others. As stakes increased, the learner engaged in more CRL with peers with similar intellectual level and supervisors to prepare for these assessments. SRL and CRL influenced by assessments in residency had a knock-on effect in clinical practice as ECS in: 1) developing clinical reasoning, 2) improving doctor-patient communication and negotiation skills, and 3) self-reflections and seeking feedback to deal with expectations of self or others.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study supported that the stakes of assessments within residency reinforced SRL and CRL during residency with a continued effect on learning as ECS.</p>","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"237-246"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.860","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Assessments drive learning but the influence of the stakes of the assessments on self-regulated (SRL) during and after residency are unknown. As early career specialists (ECS) must continue learning independently, the answer to this is important as it may inform future assessments with the potential to promote life-long learning after graduation.

Methods: We utilized constructivist grounded theory to explore the perspectives of eighteen ECS on the influence of stakes of assessments within residency on their SRL during training and in current practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews.

Results: We initially set out to examine the influence of the stakes of assessments on SRL during residency and after graduation. However, it was apparent that learners increasingly engaged with others in co-regulated learning (CRL) as the perceived stakes of the assessments increased. The individual learner's SRL was embedded in CRL in preparation for the various assessments in residency. For low-stakes assessments, the learner engaged in less CRL, taking less cues from others. As stakes increased, the learner engaged in more CRL with peers with similar intellectual level and supervisors to prepare for these assessments. SRL and CRL influenced by assessments in residency had a knock-on effect in clinical practice as ECS in: 1) developing clinical reasoning, 2) improving doctor-patient communication and negotiation skills, and 3) self-reflections and seeking feedback to deal with expectations of self or others.

Discussion: Our study supported that the stakes of assessments within residency reinforced SRL and CRL during residency with a continued effect on learning as ECS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院医师评估的风险:对早期职业专家过去和当前自我调节学习和共同调节学习的影响。
简介:评估促进学习,但评估的风险对自我调节(SRL)在住院期间和之后的影响是未知的。作为早期职业专家(ECS)必须继续独立学习,这个问题的答案很重要,因为它可能会为未来的评估提供信息,并有可能促进毕业后的终身学习。方法:运用建构主义理论,探讨18名住院医师在培训期间和当前实践中评估风险对其SRL的影响。我们进行了半结构化的采访。结果:我们首先考察了实习期间和毕业后评估风险对SRL的影响。然而,很明显,随着评估的感知风险增加,学习者越来越多地与他人参与共同调节学习(CRL)。个别学习者的SRL被嵌入到CRL中,为住院期间的各种评估做准备。对于低风险的评估,学习者参与较少的CRL,从别人那里得到较少的提示。随着风险的增加,学习者与具有相似智力水平的同伴和主管进行更多的CRL,以准备这些评估。受住院医师评估影响的SRL和CRL在临床实践中具有连锁反应,如ECS: 1)发展临床推理,2)提高医患沟通和谈判技巧,以及3)自我反思和寻求反馈以应对自我或他人的期望。讨论:我们的研究支持住院期间评估的重要性增强了住院期间的SRL和CRL,并对作为ECS的学习产生持续影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO). Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
期刊最新文献
Navigating Dilemmas Arising from Advocacy and Resistance in Medical Education and Medical Practice. From Theory to Practice: The Impact of Team-Based Learning on Medical Students' Communication Skills. From Learner to Provider: Navigating Role Tensions in Postgraduate Medical Training Through Activity Theory. Novice Experts: Exploring Fellows' Perspectives on the Transition from Residency to Fellowship. Teach the Unteachable with a Virtual Reality (VR) Brain Death Scenario - 800 Students and 3 Years of Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1