Exploring the Caregiver Role after Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Qualitative Analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Parkinson's Disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/5932865
Suzette Shahmoon, Patricia Limousin, Marjan Jahanshahi
{"title":"Exploring the Caregiver Role after Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Suzette Shahmoon,&nbsp;Patricia Limousin,&nbsp;Marjan Jahanshahi","doi":"10.1155/2023/5932865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot study aimed to explore how caregiver spouses make sense of themselves one and five years after their partner's deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease. 16 spouse (8 husbands and 8 wives) caregivers were recruited for the interview. Eight struggled to reflect on their own lived experience and primarily focused on the impact of PD on their partners, such that their transcripts were no longer viable for interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). A content analysis showed (1) how these 8 caregivers shared less than half as many self-reflections than the other caregivers, (2) that there was a bias to reflect on their partner's experience answering the opening question, (3) the bias continued when answering subsequent questions, and (4) there was a lack of awareness of this bias. No other patterns of behaviour or themes were able to be extracted. The remaining 8 interviews were transcribed and analysed using IPA. This analysis discovered 3 inter-related themes: (1) DBS allows carers to question and shift the caregiver role, (2) Parkinson's unites and DBS divides, and (3) seeing myself and my needs, DBS enhances visibility. How these caregivers interacted with these themes depended on when their partners were operated. The results suggested that spouses maintained the role of caregiver one year post DBS because they struggle to identify themselves in any other way but were more comfortable reassociating into the role of spouse 5 years post surgery. Further inquiry into caregiver and patient identity roles post DBS is recommended as a means of supporting their psychosocial adjustment after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19907,"journal":{"name":"Parkinson's Disease","volume":"2023 ","pages":"5932865"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5932865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This pilot study aimed to explore how caregiver spouses make sense of themselves one and five years after their partner's deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease. 16 spouse (8 husbands and 8 wives) caregivers were recruited for the interview. Eight struggled to reflect on their own lived experience and primarily focused on the impact of PD on their partners, such that their transcripts were no longer viable for interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). A content analysis showed (1) how these 8 caregivers shared less than half as many self-reflections than the other caregivers, (2) that there was a bias to reflect on their partner's experience answering the opening question, (3) the bias continued when answering subsequent questions, and (4) there was a lack of awareness of this bias. No other patterns of behaviour or themes were able to be extracted. The remaining 8 interviews were transcribed and analysed using IPA. This analysis discovered 3 inter-related themes: (1) DBS allows carers to question and shift the caregiver role, (2) Parkinson's unites and DBS divides, and (3) seeing myself and my needs, DBS enhances visibility. How these caregivers interacted with these themes depended on when their partners were operated. The results suggested that spouses maintained the role of caregiver one year post DBS because they struggle to identify themselves in any other way but were more comfortable reassociating into the role of spouse 5 years post surgery. Further inquiry into caregiver and patient identity roles post DBS is recommended as a means of supporting their psychosocial adjustment after surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨帕金森病深部脑刺激手术后照顾者的角色:一项定性分析。
这项初步研究旨在探索在伴侣接受帕金森病深部脑刺激(DBS)手术后1年和5年,照顾对方的配偶如何理解自己。16名配偶(8名丈夫和8名妻子)照顾者被招募参加访谈。其中8人努力反思自己的生活经历,并主要关注PD对其伴侣的影响,因此他们的记录不再适用于解释现象学分析(IPA)。一项内容分析显示:(1)这8名照顾者的自我反思少于其他照顾者的一半,(2)在回答开始问题时,他们倾向于反思伴侣的经历,(3)在回答后续问题时,这种偏见仍在继续,(4)缺乏对这种偏见的意识。无法提取出其他行为模式或主题。其余8个访谈用国际音标法进行转录和分析。该分析发现了3个相互关联的主题:(1)DBS允许照顾者质疑和转变照顾者的角色,(2)帕金森联合和DBS分裂,(3)看到我自己和我的需求,DBS提高了可见性。这些照顾者如何与这些主题互动取决于他们的伴侣何时接受手术。结果表明,配偶在DBS手术后一年仍然扮演照顾者的角色,因为他们很难以任何其他方式识别自己,但在手术后5年,他们更容易重新融入配偶的角色。进一步调查护理者和患者身份角色后DBS建议作为一种手段,支持他们的手术后心理社会调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson's Disease CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Parkinson’s Disease is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, genetics, cellular, molecular and neurophysiology, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson’s disease.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and Feasibility of Nonpharmacological Interventions for People With Parkinson's Disease and Cognitive Impairment on Patient-Centred Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale. A Cognitive-Behavioral Model of Apathy in Parkinson's Disease. Possible Implications of Managing Alexithymia on Quality of Life in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review. Implications of Convolutional Neural Network for Brain MRI Image Classification to Identify Alzheimer's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1