Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Mentalization Scale (MentS).

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5080/u25692
Zulal Törenli Kaya, Emre Han Alpay, Şerif Türkkal Yenigüç, Gamze Özçürümez Bilgili
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Mentalization Scale (MentS).","authors":"Zulal Törenli Kaya,&nbsp;Emre Han Alpay,&nbsp;Şerif Türkkal Yenigüç,&nbsp;Gamze Özçürümez Bilgili","doi":"10.5080/u25692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study, aims to translate the Mentalization Scale (MentS) into Turkish and investigate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The participants, consisting of 615 (310 female and 305 male) Turkish speaking adults, were asked to complete the MentS and the Emotional Intelligence Feature Scale-Short Form (EIFS) and the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The factor structure of the scale was investigated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Similar with the original scale, findings demonstrated a three-factor structure, namely, 'the self,' 'others' and 'motivation'. Corrected total score correlations for each item were between 0.28 and 0.52. The MentS score showed positive correlations with the EIFS score (r=0.49; p<0.001); and negative correlations with the BPI score (r=-0.37; p<0.001). Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.84 for the total score, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.79 for MentS-S, MentS-O, and MentS-M, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings show that the 25-item MentS Turkish form has sufficient psychometric properties. Our data supports the use of the Turkish version of MentS in future studies for assessment of mentalization capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47266,"journal":{"name":"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552171/pdf/turkpsychiatry-34-118.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5080/u25692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: This study, aims to translate the Mentalization Scale (MentS) into Turkish and investigate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version.

Method: The participants, consisting of 615 (310 female and 305 male) Turkish speaking adults, were asked to complete the MentS and the Emotional Intelligence Feature Scale-Short Form (EIFS) and the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI).

Results: The factor structure of the scale was investigated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Similar with the original scale, findings demonstrated a three-factor structure, namely, 'the self,' 'others' and 'motivation'. Corrected total score correlations for each item were between 0.28 and 0.52. The MentS score showed positive correlations with the EIFS score (r=0.49; p<0.001); and negative correlations with the BPI score (r=-0.37; p<0.001). Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.84 for the total score, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.79 for MentS-S, MentS-O, and MentS-M, respectively.

Conclusion: The findings show that the 25-item MentS Turkish form has sufficient psychometric properties. Our data supports the use of the Turkish version of MentS in future studies for assessment of mentalization capacity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其版心理化量表的有效性和可靠性。
目的:本研究旨在将《心理化量表》翻译成土耳其语,并考察土耳其文版本的信度和有效性。方法:615名(310名女性和305名男性)讲土耳其语的成年人被要求完成心理和情绪智力特征量表(EIFS)和边缘人格量表(BPI)。与最初的量表相似,研究结果表明了一个三因素结构,即“自我”、“他人”和“动机”。每个项目的校正总分相关性在0.28和0.52之间。MentS评分与EIFS评分呈正相关(r=0.49;P结论:研究结果表明,25项MentS土耳其语形式具有足够的心理测量特性。我们的数据支持在未来的研究中使用土耳其文版本的MentS来评估心理化能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Adolescents Who Have Internet Addiction Accompanied By Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder in Terms of Emotion Regulation and Social Cognition. Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale: Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Form. Evaluation of Simple Markers of Inflammation and Systemic Immune Inflammation Index in Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder Patients and Healthy Controls. Eating Disorder-15: Factor Structure, Psychometric Properties, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish Version for Clinical and Non-Clinical Samples. Body Focused Repetitive Behavior Disorders: Behavioral Models and Neurobiological Mechanisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1