Accuracy of a Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Q3 Medicine Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-03
Yasushi Nakagawa, Yushi Hirota, Akane Yamamoto, Tomofumi Takayoshi, Takehito Takeuchi, Tetsushi Hamaguchi, Atsuko Matsuoka, Kazuhiko Sakaguchi, Wataru Ogawa
{"title":"Accuracy of a Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Yasushi Nakagawa,&nbsp;Yushi Hirota,&nbsp;Akane Yamamoto,&nbsp;Tomofumi Takayoshi,&nbsp;Takehito Takeuchi,&nbsp;Tetsushi Hamaguchi,&nbsp;Atsuko Matsuoka,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Sakaguchi,&nbsp;Wataru Ogawa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices, which continuously measure glucose concentration in subcutaneous interstitial fluid for comprehensive monitoring of blood glucose profile, only FreeStyle Libre Pro® (Abbott Diabetes Care) is currently available in Japan as a professional system. FreeStyle Libre Pro® is easy to use because it does not require calibration by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), but information on its accuracy has been insufficient. To evaluate the measurement accuracy of FreeStyle Libre Pro®, we have now compared blood glucose levels determined by this device with those measured by SMBG in 40 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) for FreeStyle Libre Pro® measurements compared with SMBG measurements was calculated as an index of CGM accuracy. Overall blood glucose values measured by SMBG were 167.0 ± 60.1 mg/dL, and those determined by FreeStyle Libre Pro® were 155.0 ± 60.7 mg/dL, with this difference being statistically significant. The MARD for FreeStyle Libre Pro® relative to SMBG was 12.7 ± 9.3%. It was substantially higher in 2 of the 40 patients, at 49.2% and 47.5%, than in the other 38 individuals. MARD values did not differ significantly between before and 2 h after meals. However, the MARD was significantly higher for SMBG values of <100 mg/dL than for those of ≥250 mg/dL. Our results thus indicate that the measurement accuracy of FreeStyle Libre Pro® is relatively good, but that some cases in which values determined by the device deviate from SMBG values require caution in interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39560,"journal":{"name":"Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"68 1","pages":"E5-E10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117624/pdf/kobej-68-e5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices, which continuously measure glucose concentration in subcutaneous interstitial fluid for comprehensive monitoring of blood glucose profile, only FreeStyle Libre Pro® (Abbott Diabetes Care) is currently available in Japan as a professional system. FreeStyle Libre Pro® is easy to use because it does not require calibration by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), but information on its accuracy has been insufficient. To evaluate the measurement accuracy of FreeStyle Libre Pro®, we have now compared blood glucose levels determined by this device with those measured by SMBG in 40 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) for FreeStyle Libre Pro® measurements compared with SMBG measurements was calculated as an index of CGM accuracy. Overall blood glucose values measured by SMBG were 167.0 ± 60.1 mg/dL, and those determined by FreeStyle Libre Pro® were 155.0 ± 60.7 mg/dL, with this difference being statistically significant. The MARD for FreeStyle Libre Pro® relative to SMBG was 12.7 ± 9.3%. It was substantially higher in 2 of the 40 patients, at 49.2% and 47.5%, than in the other 38 individuals. MARD values did not differ significantly between before and 2 h after meals. However, the MARD was significantly higher for SMBG values of <100 mg/dL than for those of ≥250 mg/dL. Our results thus indicate that the measurement accuracy of FreeStyle Libre Pro® is relatively good, but that some cases in which values determined by the device deviate from SMBG values require caution in interpretation.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业连续血糖监测设备在2型糖尿病患者中的准确性
在连续血糖监测(CGM)设备中,连续测量皮下间质液中的葡萄糖浓度以全面监测血糖谱,目前只有FreeStyle Libre Pro®(雅培糖尿病护理)作为专业系统在日本上市。FreeStyle Libre Pro®易于使用,因为它不需要通过自我监测血糖(SMBG)进行校准,但有关其准确性的信息不足。为了评估FreeStyle Libre Pro®的测量准确性,我们现在将40名2型糖尿病患者的血糖水平与SMBG测量的血糖水平进行了比较。计算FreeStyle Libre Pro®测量值与SMBG测量值的平均绝对相对差(MARD),作为CGM精度的指标。SMBG测定的总血糖值为167.0±60.1 mg/dL, FreeStyle Libre Pro®测定的总血糖值为155.0±60.7 mg/dL,差异有统计学意义。FreeStyle Libre Pro®相对于SMBG的MARD为12.7±9.3%。在40名患者中,有2名患者的这一比例明显高于其他38名患者,分别为49.2%和47.5%。餐前和餐后2小时MARD值无显著差异。然而,SMBG值的MARD显著高于
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences
Kobe Journal of Medical Sciences Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis Using Shear Wave Elastography after Surgery for Congenital Biliary Dilatation. Role of a Home-visit Nursing Agency in Supporting Patients with Heart Failure on Continuous Catecholamine Infusion: A Case Series Study. A Japanese Case of Food Protein-induced Enterocolitis Syndrome Caused by Multiple Seafoods. Comparison over Time of Adverse Drug Reactions in Diabetes Patients Treated with Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors. Difficulty in Removing a Ureteral Stent post Childbirth due to Encrustation: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1