Intent to Understand the Meaning of Psychotic Symptoms During Patient-Psychiatrist Interactions.

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20220034
Jeremy M Ridenour, Michael Garrett
{"title":"Intent to Understand the Meaning of Psychotic Symptoms During Patient-Psychiatrist Interactions.","authors":"Jeremy M Ridenour,&nbsp;Michael Garrett","doi":"10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20220034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research confirms that although patients experiencing psychosis want to speak about their symptoms with psychiatrists, psychiatrists are often hesitant to engage them directly in such conversations because of their fear of colluding, promoting defensiveness, or rupturing the therapeutic alliance. As a result, patients are often left to contend with confusing psychotic experiences, such as hallucinations and delusions, that they cannot make sense of on their own. In this article, the common barriers that prevent engagement in conversations about psychosis are described, and the conventional wisdom about the futility of talking with patients about delusions is challenged. The article suggests that instead of avoiding conversations about psychotic ideas, psychiatrists should embrace an \"intent to understand,\" an inquisitive state of mind even in the face of seemingly incomprehensible symptoms. Such a stance can promote the therapeutic alliance, deepen an understanding of the patient as a person, and facilitate an integrative recovery style. Finally, the article offers clinical pointers, including the importance of behaving courteously and respectfully, listening to the affect expressed in the symptom, and looking for connections between the symptom and painful life experiences. Maintaining an intent to understand may help psychiatric residents-in-training, as well as experienced clinicians, to foster an empathic understanding that builds a positive therapeutic alliance and contributes to more successful pharmacotherapy and psychotherapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46822,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY","volume":"76 2","pages":"57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20220034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research confirms that although patients experiencing psychosis want to speak about their symptoms with psychiatrists, psychiatrists are often hesitant to engage them directly in such conversations because of their fear of colluding, promoting defensiveness, or rupturing the therapeutic alliance. As a result, patients are often left to contend with confusing psychotic experiences, such as hallucinations and delusions, that they cannot make sense of on their own. In this article, the common barriers that prevent engagement in conversations about psychosis are described, and the conventional wisdom about the futility of talking with patients about delusions is challenged. The article suggests that instead of avoiding conversations about psychotic ideas, psychiatrists should embrace an "intent to understand," an inquisitive state of mind even in the face of seemingly incomprehensible symptoms. Such a stance can promote the therapeutic alliance, deepen an understanding of the patient as a person, and facilitate an integrative recovery style. Finally, the article offers clinical pointers, including the importance of behaving courteously and respectfully, listening to the affect expressed in the symptom, and looking for connections between the symptom and painful life experiences. Maintaining an intent to understand may help psychiatric residents-in-training, as well as experienced clinicians, to foster an empathic understanding that builds a positive therapeutic alliance and contributes to more successful pharmacotherapy and psychotherapeutic interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解精神病患者-精神科医生互动过程中精神病症状意义的意图。
研究证实,尽管患有精神病的患者想要与精神科医生谈论他们的症状,但精神科医生往往不愿直接与他们进行这样的对话,因为他们害怕串通一气,促进防御,或破坏治疗联盟。因此,患者常常不得不忍受令人困惑的精神症状,比如幻觉和妄想,而他们自己无法理解这些症状。在这篇文章中,我们描述了一些常见的障碍,这些障碍阻碍了人们参与到关于精神病的对话中,并且挑战了与患者谈论妄想是徒劳的传统智慧。这篇文章建议,精神科医生不应该避免谈论精神病的想法,而应该抱着一种“理解的意图”,即使面对看似难以理解的症状,也要保持一种好奇的心态。这样的立场可以促进治疗联盟,加深对患者作为一个人的理解,并促进综合康复方式。最后,文章提供了临床指导,包括行为礼貌和尊重的重要性,倾听症状中表达的情感,寻找症状与痛苦生活经历之间的联系。保持理解的意图可以帮助精神科住院医师以及经验丰富的临床医生培养移情理解,从而建立积极的治疗联盟,并有助于更成功的药物治疗和心理治疗干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Founded in 1939, the American Journal of Psychotherapy (AJP) has long been a leader in the publication of eclectic articles for all psychotherapists. Transtheoretic in reach (offering information for psychotherapists across all theoretical foundations), the goal of AJP is to present an overview of the psychotherapies, subsuming a host of schools, techniques, and psychological modalities within the larger domain of clinical practice under broad themes including dynamic, behavioral, spiritual, and experiential.
期刊最新文献
Guarding the Guidelines: Objectivity in Treatment Recommendations. Trauma-Focused ACT: A Practitioner's Guide to Working With Mind, Body, and Emotion Using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents: Examining Preliminary Pretreatment Expectations and Preferences. Implementing a Problem-Oriented Integrative Therapy: Flexible Care for Patients Experiencing Complex Psychiatric Conditions. Problem-Oriented Integrative Therapy: Maximizing Clinical Flexibility in Treating Complex Psychiatric Conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1