Adverse outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with and without cardiac amyloidosis: a Nationwide Readmissions Database analysis (2015-2019).

European Heart Journal Open Pub Date : 2023-03-14 eCollection Date: 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oead026
Waqas Ullah, Max Ruge, Alexander G Hajduczok, Kirpal Kochar, Daniel R Frisch, Behzad B Pavri, Rene Alvarez, Indranee N Rajapreyar, Yevgeniy Brailovsky
{"title":"Adverse outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with and without cardiac amyloidosis: a Nationwide Readmissions Database analysis (2015-2019).","authors":"Waqas Ullah, Max Ruge, Alexander G Hajduczok, Kirpal Kochar, Daniel R Frisch, Behzad B Pavri, Rene Alvarez, Indranee N Rajapreyar, Yevgeniy Brailovsky","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) has been linked with a worse prognosis. The current study aimed to determine the outcomes of AF catheter ablation in patients with CA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2015-2019) was used to identify patients with AF and concomitant heart failure. Among these, patients who underwent catheter ablation were classified into two groups, patients with and without CA. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of index admission and 30-day readmission outcomes was calculated using a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. A total of 148 134 patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation were identified on crude analysis. Using PSM analysis, 616 patients (293 CA-AF, 323 non-CA-AF) were selected based on a balanced distribution of baseline comorbidities. At index admission, AF ablation in patients with CA was associated with significantly higher adjusted odds of net adverse clinical events (NACE) [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.21, 95% CI 1.7-5.20], in-hospital mortality (aOR 9.03, 95% CI 1.12-72.70), and pericardial effusion (aOR 3.30, 95% CI 1.57-6.93) compared with non-CA-AF. There was no significant difference in the odds of stroke, cardiac tamponade, and major bleeding between the two groups. At 30-day readmission, the incidence of NACE and mortality remained high in patients undergoing AF ablation in CA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with non-CA, AF ablation in CA patients is associated with relatively higher in-hospital all-cause mortality and net adverse events both at index admission and up to 30-day follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":11973,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8a/31/oead026.PMC10098254.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) has been linked with a worse prognosis. The current study aimed to determine the outcomes of AF catheter ablation in patients with CA.

Methods and results: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2015-2019) was used to identify patients with AF and concomitant heart failure. Among these, patients who underwent catheter ablation were classified into two groups, patients with and without CA. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of index admission and 30-day readmission outcomes was calculated using a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. A total of 148 134 patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation were identified on crude analysis. Using PSM analysis, 616 patients (293 CA-AF, 323 non-CA-AF) were selected based on a balanced distribution of baseline comorbidities. At index admission, AF ablation in patients with CA was associated with significantly higher adjusted odds of net adverse clinical events (NACE) [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.21, 95% CI 1.7-5.20], in-hospital mortality (aOR 9.03, 95% CI 1.12-72.70), and pericardial effusion (aOR 3.30, 95% CI 1.57-6.93) compared with non-CA-AF. There was no significant difference in the odds of stroke, cardiac tamponade, and major bleeding between the two groups. At 30-day readmission, the incidence of NACE and mortality remained high in patients undergoing AF ablation in CA.

Conclusion: Compared with non-CA, AF ablation in CA patients is associated with relatively higher in-hospital all-cause mortality and net adverse events both at index admission and up to 30-day follow-up.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有心脏淀粉样变性和无心脏淀粉样变性的心衰患者心房颤动消融的不良后果:全国再住院数据库分析(2015-2019年)。
目的:心脏淀粉样变性(CA)患者的房颤(AF)与预后不良有关。本研究旨在确定心脏淀粉样变性患者房颤导管消融的结果:利用全国再入院数据库(2015-2019 年)识别房颤并伴有心衰的患者。其中,接受导管消融术的患者被分为两组,即有CA和无CA的患者。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析法计算了指数入院和30天再入院结果的调整赔率比(aOR)。经粗略分析,共有 148 134 名房颤患者接受了导管消融术。通过倾向得分匹配分析,根据基线合并症的均衡分布选出了 616 名患者(293 名 CA-AF 患者,323 名非 CA-AF 患者)。入院时,与非 CA-AF 患者相比,CA 患者的房颤消融与净不良临床事件(NACE)[调整赔率(aOR)4.21,95% CI 1.7-5.20]、院内死亡率(aOR 9.03,95% CI 1.12-72.70)和心包积液(aOR 3.30,95% CI 1.57-6.93)的调整赔率显著相关。两组患者发生中风、心脏填塞和大出血的几率没有明显差异。在30天再入院时,接受房颤消融术的CA患者的NACE发生率和死亡率仍然很高:结论:与非 CA 患者相比,CA 患者接受房颤消融术后,在入院时和 30 天随访期间的院内全因死亡率和净不良事件发生率都相对较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes of intracardiac flow dynamics measured by HyperDoppler in patients with aortic stenosis Development of a Small Animal Model Replicating Core Characteristics of Takotsubo Syndrome in Humans Elastin turnover in Williams Beuren and 7q11.23 microduplication syndromes Myeloid-specific interleukin-6 response: from vascular effects to the potential for novel personalized medicines Myeloid cell derived Interleukin-6 induces vascular dysfunction and vascular and systemic inflammation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1