Filtering the rejection set while preserving false discovery rate control.

IF 3 1区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Journal of the American Statistical Association Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1080/01621459.2021.1920958
Eugene Katsevich, Chiara Sabatti, Marina Bogomolov
{"title":"Filtering the rejection set while preserving false discovery rate control.","authors":"Eugene Katsevich, Chiara Sabatti, Marina Bogomolov","doi":"10.1080/01621459.2021.1920958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific hypotheses in a variety of applications have domain-specific structures, such as the tree structure of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), the directed acyclic graph structure of the Gene Ontology (GO), or the spatial structure in genome-wide association studies. In the context of multiple testing, the resulting relationships among hypotheses can create redundancies among rejections that hinder interpretability. This leads to the practice of filtering rejection sets obtained from multiple testing procedures, which may in turn invalidate their inferential guarantees. We propose Focused BH, a simple, flexible, and principled methodology to adjust for the application of any pre-specified filter. We prove that Focused BH controls the false discovery rate under various conditions, including when the filter satisfies an intuitive monotonicity property and the <i>p</i>-values are positively dependent. We demonstrate in simulations that Focused BH performs well across a variety of settings, and illustrate this method's practical utility via analyses of real datasets based on ICD and GO.</p>","PeriodicalId":17227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Statistical Association","volume":"118 541","pages":"165-176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10281705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Statistical Association","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2021.1920958","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific hypotheses in a variety of applications have domain-specific structures, such as the tree structure of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), the directed acyclic graph structure of the Gene Ontology (GO), or the spatial structure in genome-wide association studies. In the context of multiple testing, the resulting relationships among hypotheses can create redundancies among rejections that hinder interpretability. This leads to the practice of filtering rejection sets obtained from multiple testing procedures, which may in turn invalidate their inferential guarantees. We propose Focused BH, a simple, flexible, and principled methodology to adjust for the application of any pre-specified filter. We prove that Focused BH controls the false discovery rate under various conditions, including when the filter satisfies an intuitive monotonicity property and the p-values are positively dependent. We demonstrate in simulations that Focused BH performs well across a variety of settings, and illustrate this method's practical utility via analyses of real datasets based on ICD and GO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过滤剔除集,同时保持误发现率控制。
各种应用中的科学假设都具有特定领域的结构,如国际疾病分类(ICD)的树状结构、基因本体(GO)的有向无环图结构或全基因组关联研究中的空间结构。在多重检验的背景下,假设之间的关系可能会在剔除结果中产生冗余,从而妨碍可解释性。这就导致了对多重检验程序中得到的拒绝集进行过滤的做法,而这反过来又可能使其推论保证失效。我们提出了 "聚焦 BH",这是一种简单、灵活、原则性强的方法,可用于调整任何预先指定的筛选器的应用。我们证明,Focused BH 可以在各种条件下控制误发现率,包括当筛选器满足直观的单调性属性且 p 值正相关时。我们通过仿真证明了 Focused BH 在各种情况下的良好表现,并通过对基于 ICD 和 GO 的真实数据集的分析说明了这种方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
168
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Established in 1888 and published quarterly in March, June, September, and December, the Journal of the American Statistical Association ( JASA ) has long been considered the premier journal of statistical science. Articles focus on statistical applications, theory, and methods in economic, social, physical, engineering, and health sciences. Important books contributing to statistical advancement are reviewed in JASA . JASA is indexed in Current Index to Statistics and MathSci Online and reviewed in Mathematical Reviews. JASA is abstracted by Access Company and is indexed and abstracted in the SRM Database of Social Research Methodology.
期刊最新文献
Identifiability and Consistent Estimation for Gaussian Chain Graph Models Data Science and Predictive Analytics: Biomedical and Health Applications using R, 2nd ed. Extremal Random Forests Quantitative Methods for Precision Medicine: Pharmacogenomics in Action. Graphical Principal Component Analysis of Multivariate Functional Time Series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1