Verification of Reliability and Validity of Trunk Forward Tilt Angle Measurement During Gait Using 2-Dimensional Motion Analysis

Shinno Iijima PhD, RPT , Makoto Shiomi MS, RPT , Tsuyoshi Hara PhD, RPT
{"title":"Verification of Reliability and Validity of Trunk Forward Tilt Angle Measurement During Gait Using 2-Dimensional Motion Analysis","authors":"Shinno Iijima PhD, RPT ,&nbsp;Makoto Shiomi MS, RPT ,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Hara PhD, RPT","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to verify the reliability and validity of trunk forward tilt angle measurement during gait using the 2-dimensional motion analysis, open-source software Kinovea.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The participants were 48 healthy people (23.3 ± 3.7 years of age), and the measurement task was normal gait. Two-dimensional motion analysis using Kinovea and measurement using a 3-dimensional motion analyzer were performed synchronously to calculate the forward tilt angle of the trunk during gait. The maximum and minimum values ​​of the trunk forward tilt angle in 1 gait cycle were used as representative values. The intraclass correlation coefficient and the minimum detectable change amount in Kinovea were calculated. We also verified the correlation with the measured values ​​using the 3-dimensional motion analyzer and the error by Bland-Altman analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The intraclass correlation coefficient for Kinovea was 0.925 (95% confidence interval, 0.866-0.958) at the maximum and 0.918 (95% confidence interval, 0.854-0.954) at the minimum. The maximum value of the minimum detectable change amount was 2.7°, and the minimum value was 2.9°. The correlation coefficient between the methods was the maximum value <em>r</em> = 0.964 (<em>R</em>² = 0.929) and the minimum value <em>r</em> = 0.970 (<em>R</em>² = 0.941). The average difference between the methods (d) was –0.55 to –0.51° and the standard deviation of the difference between the measured values was 0.66 to 0.84°, and the minimum value was d = –0.59 to –0.54° and SDd = 0.63 to 0.91°.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The reliability and validity of the measurement by 2-dimensional motion analysis of the trunk forward tilt angle in young adults were confirmed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722000694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to verify the reliability and validity of trunk forward tilt angle measurement during gait using the 2-dimensional motion analysis, open-source software Kinovea.

Methods

The participants were 48 healthy people (23.3 ± 3.7 years of age), and the measurement task was normal gait. Two-dimensional motion analysis using Kinovea and measurement using a 3-dimensional motion analyzer were performed synchronously to calculate the forward tilt angle of the trunk during gait. The maximum and minimum values ​​of the trunk forward tilt angle in 1 gait cycle were used as representative values. The intraclass correlation coefficient and the minimum detectable change amount in Kinovea were calculated. We also verified the correlation with the measured values ​​using the 3-dimensional motion analyzer and the error by Bland-Altman analysis.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficient for Kinovea was 0.925 (95% confidence interval, 0.866-0.958) at the maximum and 0.918 (95% confidence interval, 0.854-0.954) at the minimum. The maximum value of the minimum detectable change amount was 2.7°, and the minimum value was 2.9°. The correlation coefficient between the methods was the maximum value r = 0.964 (R² = 0.929) and the minimum value r = 0.970 (R² = 0.941). The average difference between the methods (d) was –0.55 to –0.51° and the standard deviation of the difference between the measured values was 0.66 to 0.84°, and the minimum value was d = –0.59 to –0.54° and SDd = 0.63 to 0.91°.

Conclusion

The reliability and validity of the measurement by 2-dimensional motion analysis of the trunk forward tilt angle in young adults were confirmed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于二维运动分析的躯干前倾角度测量的可靠性和有效性验证
目的利用开源软件Kinovea进行二维运动分析,验证步态中躯干前倾角度测量的可靠性和有效性。方法48名健康人群(23.3±3.7岁),测量任务为正常步态。使用Kinovea进行二维运动分析,同时使用三维运动分析仪进行测量,以计算步态时躯干的前倾角度。选取1个步态周期内躯干前倾角度的最大值和最小值作为代表值。计算了Kinovea的类内相关系数和最小可检测变化量。利用三维运动分析仪验证了与测量值的相关性,并用Bland-Altman分析验证了误差。结果Kinovea的类内相关系数最大为0.925(95%可信区间0.866 ~ 0.958),最小为0.918(95%可信区间0.854 ~ 0.954)。最小可检测变化量的最大值为2.7°,最小值为2.9°。两种方法的相关系数最大值r = 0.964 (r²= 0.929),最小r = 0.970 (r²= 0.941)。方法间的平均差值(d)为-0.55 ~ -0.51°,实测值差值的标准差为0.66 ~ 0.84°,最小值为d = -0.59 ~ -0.54°,SDd = 0.63 ~ 0.91°。结论用二维运动分析法测量青少年躯干前倾角的方法具有较高的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Pain-Related Anxiety and Abdominal Muscle Thickness during Standing Postural Tasks in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain Analgesic Self-medication Among Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in a South African Chiropractic Teaching Clinic: A Cross-sectional Study Development of a Headache Diary and Assessment of Tension-Type Headache Diagnostic Criteria and Oral Behaviors, Joint Range of Motion, and Tenderness to Palpation: An Observational Study Editorial board Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1