Increased risk of adverse events in patients with low-on clopidogrel platelet reactivity after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5603/CJ.a2021.0084
Alexandra Bálint, Lilla Hanák, Péter Hegyi, Zsolt Szakács, Szimonetta Eitmann, András Garami, Margit Solymár, Katalin Márta, Zoltán Rumbus, András Komócsi
{"title":"Increased risk of adverse events in patients with low-on clopidogrel platelet reactivity after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Alexandra Bálint,&nbsp;Lilla Hanák,&nbsp;Péter Hegyi,&nbsp;Zsolt Szakács,&nbsp;Szimonetta Eitmann,&nbsp;András Garami,&nbsp;Margit Solymár,&nbsp;Katalin Márta,&nbsp;Zoltán Rumbus,&nbsp;András Komócsi","doi":"10.5603/CJ.a2021.0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical evidence has been controversial regarding the influence of low platelet reactivity (LPR), ischemic and bleeding outcomes among patients receiving coronary stent implantation. Hence, the present study performed a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the significance of LPR on adverse cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched up to November 2020 for relevant studies including patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. LPR was the exposed arm while the non-LPR group represented the control. The primary outcome of interest was bleeding risk including major and minor bleeding events. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, repeated revascularization, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. Study-level outcomes were evaluated in random-effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies with 19,064 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed that LPR was associated with an increased bleeding risk (relative risk [RR] 2.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.95-4.02, p < 0.01). Patients with LPR had a lower risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.91, p < 0.05) and of serious vascular events (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.84, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low platelet reactivity is associated with an increased bleeding risk of patients who underwent coronary stent implantation. The results suggest possible benefits of this marker in risk stratification, with potential improvement in risk prediction. There are potential advantages using combinations with other factors in prediction models, however, they require further study. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019136393).</p>","PeriodicalId":9492,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/71/90/cardj-30-3-391.PMC10287083.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical evidence has been controversial regarding the influence of low platelet reactivity (LPR), ischemic and bleeding outcomes among patients receiving coronary stent implantation. Hence, the present study performed a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the significance of LPR on adverse cardiovascular events.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched up to November 2020 for relevant studies including patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. LPR was the exposed arm while the non-LPR group represented the control. The primary outcome of interest was bleeding risk including major and minor bleeding events. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, repeated revascularization, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. Study-level outcomes were evaluated in random-effect models.

Results: A total of 20 studies with 19,064 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed that LPR was associated with an increased bleeding risk (relative risk [RR] 2.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.95-4.02, p < 0.01). Patients with LPR had a lower risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.91, p < 0.05) and of serious vascular events (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.84, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Low platelet reactivity is associated with an increased bleeding risk of patients who underwent coronary stent implantation. The results suggest possible benefits of this marker in risk stratification, with potential improvement in risk prediction. There are potential advantages using combinations with other factors in prediction models, however, they require further study. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019136393).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后低剂量氯吡格雷血小板反应性患者的不良事件风险增加:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:关于低血小板反应性(LPR)、缺血和出血对冠状动脉支架植入术患者预后的影响,临床证据一直存在争议。因此,本研究进行了荟萃分析,系统评估LPR对心血管不良事件的意义。方法:检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库,检索截至2020年11月的相关研究,包括经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者。LPR组为暴露臂,非LPR组为对照组。主要结局是出血风险,包括大出血和小出血事件。次要结局包括全因死亡率、反复血运重建术、非致死性心肌梗死和支架血栓形成。研究水平的结果在随机效应模型中进行评估。结果:共纳入20项研究,19064例患者。合并分析显示LPR与出血风险增加相关(相对危险度[RR] 2.80, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.95 ~ 4.02, p < 0.01)。LPR患者发生非致死性心肌梗死(RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38 ~ 0.91, p < 0.05)和严重血管事件(RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 ~ 0.84, p < 0.01)的风险较低。结论:低血小板反应性与冠状动脉支架植入术患者出血风险增加有关。结果表明,该标志物在风险分层方面可能有好处,在风险预测方面有潜在的改进。在预测模型中与其他因素结合使用有潜在的优势,但还需要进一步的研究。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42019136393)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology journal
Cardiology journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Journal is a scientific, peer-reviewed journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in cardiology. The journal has been published since 1994 and over the years it has become an internationally recognized journal of cardiological and medical community. Cardiology Journal is the journal for practicing cardiologists, researchers, and young trainees benefiting from broad spectrum of useful educational content.
期刊最新文献
Functional tricuspid regurgitation and efficacy of electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial functional mitral regurgitation Repeat cryoablation as a redo procedure for atrial fibrillation ablation: Is it a good choice? Prevalence and prognosis of anxiety, insomnia, and type D personality in patients with myocardial infarction: A Spanish cohort. The importance of blood pressure measurements at the emergency department in detection of arterial hypertension. Left atrial appendage filling defect in exclusive early-phase scanning of dual-phase cardiac computed tomography: An indicator for elevated thromboembolic risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1