Young Adults with Lived Foster Care Experience Who Later Experience Houselessness: an Exploratory Latent Class Analysis.

Rebecca Orsi-Hunt, Elysia V Clemens, Hilary Thibodeau, Christian Belcher
{"title":"Young Adults with Lived Foster Care Experience Who Later Experience Houselessness: an Exploratory Latent Class Analysis.","authors":"Rebecca Orsi-Hunt,&nbsp;Elysia V Clemens,&nbsp;Hilary Thibodeau,&nbsp;Christian Belcher","doi":"10.1007/s42448-023-00160-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Young adults with lived experience in out-of-home care during childhood report later experiences of housing instability as common. Existing literature identifies a host of factors compounding an individual's risk of experiencing houselessness, but research has yet to explore constellations of characteristics which describe youth formerly in care who later become unhoused. This exploratory study leverages a public-private data linkage collaborative to integrate and de-identify child welfare data extracted from a Rocky Mountain state's administrative database and houselessness service utilization data from a regional provider in a large metro area of the state. Linkage and sampling yielded a final sample of 285 youth (ages 18 to 24) formerly in foster care who accessed houselessness services between December 2018 and March 2020 and who had signed required consents. A 22-measure latent class analysis identified three characteristic groups: intensive youth corrections involvement and emancipation from the child welfare system (32% of sample); family-based challenges, neglect, and more moderate youth corrections involvement (41% of sample); and youth behavior and substance use challenges along with family reunification before accessing houselessness services (26%). We found that young women and Black, Indigenous, and people of color were disproportionately represented in the sample compared to the state's population of youth in out-of-home care. Youth with long histories of child welfare placement were a majority of the sample. Implications are discussed. Data-sharing barriers must be addressed to facilitate further research aimed at understanding houselessness within this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":73485,"journal":{"name":"International journal on child maltreatment : research, policy and practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10130814/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal on child maltreatment : research, policy and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-023-00160-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Young adults with lived experience in out-of-home care during childhood report later experiences of housing instability as common. Existing literature identifies a host of factors compounding an individual's risk of experiencing houselessness, but research has yet to explore constellations of characteristics which describe youth formerly in care who later become unhoused. This exploratory study leverages a public-private data linkage collaborative to integrate and de-identify child welfare data extracted from a Rocky Mountain state's administrative database and houselessness service utilization data from a regional provider in a large metro area of the state. Linkage and sampling yielded a final sample of 285 youth (ages 18 to 24) formerly in foster care who accessed houselessness services between December 2018 and March 2020 and who had signed required consents. A 22-measure latent class analysis identified three characteristic groups: intensive youth corrections involvement and emancipation from the child welfare system (32% of sample); family-based challenges, neglect, and more moderate youth corrections involvement (41% of sample); and youth behavior and substance use challenges along with family reunification before accessing houselessness services (26%). We found that young women and Black, Indigenous, and people of color were disproportionately represented in the sample compared to the state's population of youth in out-of-home care. Youth with long histories of child welfare placement were a majority of the sample. Implications are discussed. Data-sharing barriers must be addressed to facilitate further research aimed at understanding houselessness within this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有生活寄养经历的年轻人后来经历了无家可归:一项探索性的潜在阶级分析。
在童年时期有过家庭外护理经历的年轻人报告说,后来住房不稳定的经历很常见。现有文献确定了一系列加剧个人无家可归风险的因素,但研究尚未探索描述以前被照顾的年轻人后来变得无家可归的特征。这项探索性研究利用公私数据链接合作,将从落基山脉州行政数据库中提取的儿童福利数据和该州大城市地区一家地区提供商的无家可归服务利用率数据进行整合和去识别。联系和抽样产生了285名曾在寄养家庭的青年(18至24岁)的最终样本,他们在2018年12月至2020年3月期间获得了无房服务,并签署了所需的同意书。一项22项指标的潜在阶级分析确定了三个特征群体:密集的青少年管教参与和从儿童福利体系中解放出来(占样本的32%);基于家庭的挑战、忽视和更温和的青少年矫正参与(41%的样本);以及青少年在获得无房服务之前的行为和药物使用挑战以及家庭团聚(26%)。我们发现,与该州接受家庭外护理的青年人口相比,年轻女性、黑人、原住民和有色人种在样本中的比例过高。有长期儿童福利安置历史的年轻人是样本中的大多数。讨论了影响。必须解决数据共享障碍,以促进旨在了解这一人群无家可归情况的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood Caregivers’ Recommendations to a Family in Need: Patterns of Assistance Across Different Family Needs Correction to: Primary Care and Behavioral Health Services Use Differ Among Medicaid-Enrolled Children by Initial Foster Care Entry Status “You Only Know Me by Reports”: a Therapeutic Approach to Social Reports Examining the Moderating Effects of Therapy Attendance on Prenatal Parenting Attitudes Among IPV-Exposed Mothers with Histories of Child Maltreatment An Assessment of Trends in Parenting and Child Outcomes in a Rural South African Community and Consequent Intervention Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1