Nonprofits for Cohesive Cities: Neighborhood Characteristics, Organizational Practices, and their Effects on Social and Systemic Integration.

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Voluntas Pub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI:10.1007/s11266-023-00571-1
Dominik Karner, Michael Meyer, Lisa Schmidthuber, Daniel Semper, Krystal Laryea
{"title":"Nonprofits for Cohesive Cities: Neighborhood Characteristics, Organizational Practices, and their Effects on Social and Systemic Integration.","authors":"Dominik Karner,&nbsp;Michael Meyer,&nbsp;Lisa Schmidthuber,&nbsp;Daniel Semper,&nbsp;Krystal Laryea","doi":"10.1007/s11266-023-00571-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) contribute to vital neighborhoods by building communities of citizens and acting as intermediaries between citizens and organizations. We investigate how NPOs' engagement in social and systemic integration is shaped by neighborhood characteristics, and how it relates to the organizational practices of managerialism and organizational democracy. We combine survey data with administrative data from a representative sample of NPOs in a major European city. To measure the effect of neighborhood on organizational integration, we separated the city into 7,840 grid cells characterized by population, per capita income, share of immigrant population, and density of organizations. Findings indicate that managerialism positively relates with systemic integration, as organizational democracy relates with social integration. Neighborhood characteristics, however, are not related with NPOs' engagement in integration. Our findings contribute to research on urban social cohesion by illuminating the interplay between NPOs' organizing practices, local neighborhoods, and contributions to both forms of integration.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11266-023-00571-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":48082,"journal":{"name":"Voluntas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voluntas","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00571-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) contribute to vital neighborhoods by building communities of citizens and acting as intermediaries between citizens and organizations. We investigate how NPOs' engagement in social and systemic integration is shaped by neighborhood characteristics, and how it relates to the organizational practices of managerialism and organizational democracy. We combine survey data with administrative data from a representative sample of NPOs in a major European city. To measure the effect of neighborhood on organizational integration, we separated the city into 7,840 grid cells characterized by population, per capita income, share of immigrant population, and density of organizations. Findings indicate that managerialism positively relates with systemic integration, as organizational democracy relates with social integration. Neighborhood characteristics, however, are not related with NPOs' engagement in integration. Our findings contribute to research on urban social cohesion by illuminating the interplay between NPOs' organizing practices, local neighborhoods, and contributions to both forms of integration.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11266-023-00571-1.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
凝聚力城市的非营利组织:邻里特征、组织实践及其对社会和系统一体化的影响。
非营利组织通过建立公民社区并充当公民和组织之间的中介,为重要社区做出贡献。我们研究了非营利组织参与社会和系统整合是如何由社区特征塑造的,以及它与管理主义和组织民主的组织实践之间的关系。我们将调查数据与欧洲主要城市非营利组织代表性样本的行政数据相结合。为了衡量社区对组织整合的影响,我们将城市划分为7840个网格单元,以人口、人均收入、移民人口份额和组织密度为特征。研究结果表明,管理主义与系统整合呈正相关,组织民主与社会整合呈正相关。然而,邻里特征与非营利组织参与融合的程度无关。我们的发现通过阐明非营利组织的组织实践、当地社区以及对两种形式的融合的贡献之间的相互作用,有助于研究城市社会凝聚力。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s11266-023-00571-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voluntas
Voluntas SOCIAL ISSUES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Society for Third-Sector Research, Voluntas is an interdisciplinary international journal that aims to be the central forum for worldwide research in the area between the state, market, and household sectors. The journal combines full-length articles with shorter research notes (reflecting the latest developments in the field) and book reviews. Voluntas is essential reading for all those engaged in research into the Third Sector (voluntary and nonprofit organizations) including economists, lawyers, political scientists, psychologists, sociologists, and social and public policy analysts. It aims to present leading-edge academic argument around civil society issues in a style that is accessible to practitioners and policymakers.
期刊最新文献
Giving in Mexico 3rd Book: Funds, Channels, and Destinations Social Entrepreneurship: Building Impact Step by Step Nonprofit Organizations 1 Year After the Covid-19 Crisis: Understanding How the French Voluntary Sector is Opening up to Adaptations Related to Societal Orientation Online Versus In-Person Associational Involvement and Informal Volunteering Managing Digital Transformation for Social Good in Non-Profit Organizations: The Case of The Felix Project Zeroing Hunger in London
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1