Development and initial validation of a short form of the Memories of Home and Family Scale

Enya Redican, Caitlyn Rawers, Eoin McElroy, Philip Hyland, Thanos Karatzias, Menachem Ben-Ezra, Mark Shevlin
{"title":"Development and initial validation of a short form of the Memories of Home and Family Scale","authors":"Enya Redican,&nbsp;Caitlyn Rawers,&nbsp;Eoin McElroy,&nbsp;Philip Hyland,&nbsp;Thanos Karatzias,&nbsp;Menachem Ben-Ezra,&nbsp;Mark Shevlin","doi":"10.1007/s42844-023-00097-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Memories of Home and Family Scale (MHFS; Shevlin et al., 2022) was developed as a multidimensional measure of subjective memories of experiences at home and with family during childhood. Due to the length of the scale, a short version of the MHFS (MHFS-SF) has been developed. Data were from Wave 7 of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium Study (C19PRC-UK), a population based UK survey (<i>N</i> = 1405). Two items with the highest factor loadings from each of the six dimensions of the original MHFS were selected for inclusion. Confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) models were estimated to test the dimensionality of the scale. Convergent and discriminant validity were tested by examining associations with criterion variables. CFA results supported the multidimensionality of the scale. MHFS-SF total and sub-scale scores were negatively correlated with measures of depression, anxiety, loneliness, and paranoia, and were positively correlated with wellbeing. Regression analyses revealed that MHFS-SF total and sub-scale scores significantly predicted loneliness, paranoia, and wellbeing, even after accounting for age, gender, and current internalising symptoms. Results from this study suggest that the MHFS-SF scores retain the excellent psychometric properties of the original scale while improving efficiency. The MHFS-SF demonstrated high levels of convergent and discriminant validity with mental health and wellbeing measures. Future research should seek to validate the MHFS-SF in different populations and assess its usefulness in clinical settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72113,"journal":{"name":"Adversity and resilience science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42844-023-00097-x.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adversity and resilience science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42844-023-00097-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

The Memories of Home and Family Scale (MHFS; Shevlin et al., 2022) was developed as a multidimensional measure of subjective memories of experiences at home and with family during childhood. Due to the length of the scale, a short version of the MHFS (MHFS-SF) has been developed. Data were from Wave 7 of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium Study (C19PRC-UK), a population based UK survey (N = 1405). Two items with the highest factor loadings from each of the six dimensions of the original MHFS were selected for inclusion. Confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) models were estimated to test the dimensionality of the scale. Convergent and discriminant validity were tested by examining associations with criterion variables. CFA results supported the multidimensionality of the scale. MHFS-SF total and sub-scale scores were negatively correlated with measures of depression, anxiety, loneliness, and paranoia, and were positively correlated with wellbeing. Regression analyses revealed that MHFS-SF total and sub-scale scores significantly predicted loneliness, paranoia, and wellbeing, even after accounting for age, gender, and current internalising symptoms. Results from this study suggest that the MHFS-SF scores retain the excellent psychometric properties of the original scale while improving efficiency. The MHFS-SF demonstrated high levels of convergent and discriminant validity with mental health and wellbeing measures. Future research should seek to validate the MHFS-SF in different populations and assess its usefulness in clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭记忆量表的简短形式的开发和初步验证。
家庭和家庭记忆量表(MHFS;Shevlin等人,2022)是作为对童年时期在家和与家人的经历的主观记忆的多维测量而开发的。由于天平的长度,已经开发出了MHFS的短版本(MHFS-SF)。数据来自新冠肺炎心理研究联合会研究(C19PRC-UK)第7波,这是一项基于人口的英国调查(N = 1405)。从原始MHFS的六个维度中的每一个维度中选择两个因子载荷最高的项目进行纳入。对验证性因子分析(CFA)模型进行了估计,以检验量表的维度。通过检验与标准变量的相关性来检验收敛性和判别有效性。CFA的结果支持了量表的多维性。MHFS-SF总分和亚量表得分与抑郁、焦虑、孤独和偏执的测量呈负相关,与幸福感呈正相关。回归分析显示,即使考虑了年龄、性别和当前的内在症状,MHFS-SF总分和亚量表得分也能显著预测孤独、偏执和幸福感。这项研究的结果表明,MHFS-SF评分在提高效率的同时,保留了原始量表的优秀心理测量特性。MHFS-SF在心理健康和幸福感测量方面表现出高水平的收敛和判别有效性。未来的研究应寻求在不同人群中验证MHFS-SF,并评估其在临床环境中的有用性。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s42844-023-00097-x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Finding Silver Linings: Benefit-Finding, Stress, and Depressive Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic Psychological Resilience Mediates the Relationship Between BCE’s and Life Satisfaction: Examining Turkish Students Intersection of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Subjective Well-Being and Social Anxiety among Sojourners in China The Interplay Between Female Caregiver Proactive Coping, Stress, and Adaptive Caregiver Personality on Early Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Moderated-Mediation Model Self-Care Mediates Current Adverse Experiences and Depressive Symptoms Among Emerging Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1