COVAX – Time to reconsider the strategy and its target

IF 2.3 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Open Pub Date : 2023-04-13 DOI:10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100096
David Bell , Garrett W. Brown , Wellington A. Oyibo , Samiratou Ouédraogo , Blagovesta Tacheva , Elena Barbaud , Andreas Kalk , Valéry Ridde , Elisabeth Paul
{"title":"COVAX – Time to reconsider the strategy and its target","authors":"David Bell ,&nbsp;Garrett W. Brown ,&nbsp;Wellington A. Oyibo ,&nbsp;Samiratou Ouédraogo ,&nbsp;Blagovesta Tacheva ,&nbsp;Elena Barbaud ,&nbsp;Andreas Kalk ,&nbsp;Valéry Ridde ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Paul","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>COVAX, the international initiative supporting COVID-19 vaccination campaigns globally, is budgeted to be the costliest public health initiative in low- and middle-income countries, with over 16 billion US dollars already committed. While some claim that the target of vaccinating 70% of people worldwide is justified on equity grounds, we argue that this rationale is wrong for two reasons. First, mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns do not meet standard public health requirements for clear expected benefit, based on costs, disease burden and intervention effectiveness. Second, it constitutes a diversion of resources from more cost-effective and impactful public health programmes, thus reducing health equity. We conclude that the COVAX initiative warrants urgent review.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/b1/main.PMC10098302.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

COVAX, the international initiative supporting COVID-19 vaccination campaigns globally, is budgeted to be the costliest public health initiative in low- and middle-income countries, with over 16 billion US dollars already committed. While some claim that the target of vaccinating 70% of people worldwide is justified on equity grounds, we argue that this rationale is wrong for two reasons. First, mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns do not meet standard public health requirements for clear expected benefit, based on costs, disease burden and intervention effectiveness. Second, it constitutes a diversion of resources from more cost-effective and impactful public health programmes, thus reducing health equity. We conclude that the COVAX initiative warrants urgent review.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVAX——是时候重新考虑战略及其目标了
COVAX是支持全球新冠肺炎疫苗接种活动的国际举措,预算为低收入和中等收入国家成本最高的公共卫生举措,已承诺投入160多亿美元。虽然有人声称,为全球70%的人接种疫苗的目标是公平的,但我们认为,这一理由是错误的,原因有两个。首先,根据成本、疾病负担和干预效果,大规模新冠肺炎疫苗接种活动不符合明确预期效益的标准公共卫生要求。其次,它将资源从更具成本效益和影响力的公共卫生方案中转移,从而降低了卫生公平性。我们的结论是,COVAX倡议值得紧急审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nursing shortages and migration: a two-decade study of Ireland’s dependence on migrant nurses Strengthening global health cooperation-insights from worldwide WHO collaborating centres Cross-sectional analysis of accuracy versus interpretability in Medicare Advantage risk adjustment Good intentions and the costs of inaction: Financial protection in Austria Private health insurance in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1