Klebsiella pneumoniae vaccine studies in animal models

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Biologicals Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.biologicals.2023.101678
Parivash Ranjbarian , Zahra Sobhi Amjad , Roya Chegene Lorestani , Ali Shojaeian , Mosayeb Rostamian
{"title":"Klebsiella pneumoniae vaccine studies in animal models","authors":"Parivash Ranjbarian ,&nbsp;Zahra Sobhi Amjad ,&nbsp;Roya Chegene Lorestani ,&nbsp;Ali Shojaeian ,&nbsp;Mosayeb Rostamian","doi":"10.1016/j.biologicals.2023.101678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The treatment of </span><span><em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em></span> is faced with challenges demanding the development of a vaccination strategy. However, no approved and globally available vaccine exists yet. This study aimed to systematically review all published data on <em>K. pneumoniae</em><span><span> vaccines in animal models. Without time restrictions, electronic databases were searched using appropriate keywords. The retrieved studies were screened and the data of those that matched our inclusion criteria were collected and analyzed. In total, 2027 records were retrieved; of which 35 studies were included for </span>systematic review<span>. The most frequently used animal model was BALB/c mice. Proteins, polysaccharides<span><span>, and their combinations (conjugates) were the most common vaccine candidates used. The amount of antigen, the route used for immunization, and the challenge strategy was varying in the studies and were chosen based on several factors such as the animal model, the type of antigen, and the schedule of immunization. Almost all studies claimed that their vaccine was effective/protective, indicated by increasing survival rate, reducing organ bacterial load, and eliciting protective antibody and/or </span>cytokine responses. Altogether, the information presented here will assist researchers to have a better look at the </span></span></span><em>K. pneumoniae</em> vaccine candidates and to take more effective steps in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55369,"journal":{"name":"Biologicals","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 101678"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologicals","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045105623000167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae is faced with challenges demanding the development of a vaccination strategy. However, no approved and globally available vaccine exists yet. This study aimed to systematically review all published data on K. pneumoniae vaccines in animal models. Without time restrictions, electronic databases were searched using appropriate keywords. The retrieved studies were screened and the data of those that matched our inclusion criteria were collected and analyzed. In total, 2027 records were retrieved; of which 35 studies were included for systematic review. The most frequently used animal model was BALB/c mice. Proteins, polysaccharides, and their combinations (conjugates) were the most common vaccine candidates used. The amount of antigen, the route used for immunization, and the challenge strategy was varying in the studies and were chosen based on several factors such as the animal model, the type of antigen, and the schedule of immunization. Almost all studies claimed that their vaccine was effective/protective, indicated by increasing survival rate, reducing organ bacterial load, and eliciting protective antibody and/or cytokine responses. Altogether, the information presented here will assist researchers to have a better look at the K. pneumoniae vaccine candidates and to take more effective steps in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺炎克雷伯菌疫苗在动物模型中的研究
肺炎克雷伯菌的治疗面临挑战,需要制定疫苗接种策略。然而,目前还没有批准的全球可用的疫苗。本研究旨在系统地回顾所有已发表的肺炎克雷伯菌疫苗动物模型数据。在没有时间限制的情况下,使用适当的关键字搜索电子数据库。对检索到的研究进行筛选,并收集和分析符合我们纳入标准的研究的数据。总共检索到2027条记录;其中35项研究被纳入系统综述。最常用的动物模型是BALB/c小鼠。蛋白质、多糖及其组合(偶联物)是最常用的候选疫苗。抗原的量、用于免疫的途径和攻击策略在研究中各不相同,并根据动物模型、抗原类型和免疫计划等几个因素进行选择。几乎所有的研究都声称他们的疫苗是有效的/具有保护性的,这表明他们的疫苗提高了存活率,减少了器官细菌负荷,并引发了保护性抗体和/或细胞因子反应。总之,这里提供的信息将有助于研究人员更好地了解肺炎克雷伯菌候选疫苗,并在未来采取更有效的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biologicals
Biologicals 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Biologicals provides a modern and multidisciplinary international forum for news, debate, and original research on all aspects of biologicals used in human and veterinary medicine. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and letters relevant to the development, production, quality control, and standardization of biological derived from both novel and established biotechnologies. Special issues are produced to reflect topics of particular international interest and concern.Three types of papers are welcome: original research reports, short papers, and review articles. The journal will also publish comments and letters to the editor, book reviews, meeting reports and information on regulatory issues.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Preparedness and response to emerging veterinary disease outbreaks - A meeting report" [Biologicals 93 (February 2026) 101873]. Aims and Scope/Editorial Board/Publishing Details Preparedness and response to emerging veterinary disease outbreaks – A meeting report Diphtheria antitoxin potency assay: an in vitro alternative to the in vivo subcutaneous toxin neutralization test Evaluation of 1st WHO anti-malaria reference reagent for competition ELISA harmonisation and development of ADAMSEL analytical platform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1