The role of computed tomography in the detection of traumatic arthrotomies of the elbow: a cadaveric study.

Vinicius Ladeira Craveiro, Shasta Henderson, Henry Boateng, Matthew R Garner
{"title":"The role of computed tomography in the detection of traumatic arthrotomies of the elbow: a cadaveric study.","authors":"Vinicius Ladeira Craveiro,&nbsp;Shasta Henderson,&nbsp;Henry Boateng,&nbsp;Matthew R Garner","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging as a diagnostic tool for elbow arthrotomies using a standardized cadaveric arthrotomy model.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Nineteen intact fresh frozen cadaver elbows were CT scanned using 2 mm cuts with sagittal and coronal reformats in the plane of the joint and used as controls. An elbow arthrotomy at the posterocentral arthroscopic portal site was performed in all specimens using a 4.5 millimeter trocar. After arthrotomy, all elbows underwent a second CT scan followed by a standard saline load test (SLT). Images were randomized and reviewed by 2 blinded, independent reviewers. Bimodal scoring was performed for each specimen with regard to the presence of an arthrotomy indicated by presence of air in the joint. Regarding the SLT, saline exiting the arthrotomy wound was considered a positive test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CT scans were found to have 100% sensitivity and 86% specificity for diagnosing elbow arthrotomies. Interrater reliability calculated with Cohen kappa statistic was near perfect at r = 0.89. The SLT had a sensitivity of 79% when 20 mL was injected. A total of 25 mL of saline was required to be injected for a sensitivity greater than 95%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that CT scan is a reliable and less technically demanding method of diagnosis arthrotomies with high interrater reliability and high sensitivity and with results comparable with SLT. This technique may be useful in centers where trained providers are not readily available to perform SLT. Clinical study is required to validate our results.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 3","pages":"e275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0f/f9/oi9-6-e275.PMC10278719.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging as a diagnostic tool for elbow arthrotomies using a standardized cadaveric arthrotomy model.

Method: Nineteen intact fresh frozen cadaver elbows were CT scanned using 2 mm cuts with sagittal and coronal reformats in the plane of the joint and used as controls. An elbow arthrotomy at the posterocentral arthroscopic portal site was performed in all specimens using a 4.5 millimeter trocar. After arthrotomy, all elbows underwent a second CT scan followed by a standard saline load test (SLT). Images were randomized and reviewed by 2 blinded, independent reviewers. Bimodal scoring was performed for each specimen with regard to the presence of an arthrotomy indicated by presence of air in the joint. Regarding the SLT, saline exiting the arthrotomy wound was considered a positive test.

Results: CT scans were found to have 100% sensitivity and 86% specificity for diagnosing elbow arthrotomies. Interrater reliability calculated with Cohen kappa statistic was near perfect at r = 0.89. The SLT had a sensitivity of 79% when 20 mL was injected. A total of 25 mL of saline was required to be injected for a sensitivity greater than 95%.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that CT scan is a reliable and less technically demanding method of diagnosis arthrotomies with high interrater reliability and high sensitivity and with results comparable with SLT. This technique may be useful in centers where trained providers are not readily available to perform SLT. Clinical study is required to validate our results.

Level of evidence: Level II.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机断层扫描在外伤性肘关节切开术检测中的作用:一项尸体研究。
目的:通过标准化的尸体关节切开术模型,评估计算机断层扫描(CT)成像作为肘关节切开术诊断工具的应用价值。方法:对19例完整的新鲜冷冻尸体肘关节进行2 mm切口CT扫描,关节平面矢状面和冠状面复位,并作为对照。所有标本均采用4.5毫米套管针在后中央关节镜门静脉处行肘关节切开术。关节切开术后,所有肘部进行第二次CT扫描,随后进行标准生理盐水负荷试验(SLT)。图像随机化,并由2名盲法独立审稿人进行评审。对每个标本进行双峰评分,关于关节切开术的存在,关节中存在空气。对于SLT,关节切开术伤口流出的生理盐水被认为是阳性测试。结果:CT扫描诊断肘关节切开术的敏感性为100%,特异性为86%。用Cohen kappa统计量计算的互估者信度接近完美,r = 0.89。当注射20ml时,SLT的灵敏度为79%。为使灵敏度大于95%,总共需要注射25 mL生理盐水。结论:本研究表明CT扫描是一种可靠且技术要求较低的关节切开术诊断方法,具有较高的间信度和灵敏度,其结果与SLT相当。在训练有素的提供者不容易提供SLT的中心,这种技术可能很有用。需要临床研究来验证我们的结果。证据等级:二级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Patient perspectives on the desirability of social worker support in outpatient orthopaedic trauma clinics. Tension band tendon-approximating cerclage for surgical fixation of patellar fractures: a novel surgical technique. Erratum: Comparison of the Neer classification to the 2018 update of the Orthopedic Trauma Association/AO fracture classification for classifying proximal humerus fractures: Erratum. Impact of fracture type on conversion to total hip arthroplasty following surgical repair of acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma center proliferation in the United States: concerns and potential solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1