Efficacy of drug treatment for severe melioidosis and eradication treatment of melioidosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Pub Date : 2023-06-12 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0011382
Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, Krit Harncharoenkul, Kamonporn Poramathikul, Kittijarankon Phontham, Parat Boonyarangka, Worachet Kuntawunginn, Michele Spring, Daniel Boudreaux, Jeffrey Livezey, Narisara Chantratita
{"title":"Efficacy of drug treatment for severe melioidosis and eradication treatment of melioidosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, Krit Harncharoenkul, Kamonporn Poramathikul, Kittijarankon Phontham, Parat Boonyarangka, Worachet Kuntawunginn, Michele Spring, Daniel Boudreaux, Jeffrey Livezey, Narisara Chantratita","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0011382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of all available treatments for severe melioidosis in decreasing hospital mortality and to identify eradication therapies with low disease recurrence rates and minimal risk of adverse drug events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) were searched from Medline and Scopus databases from their inception until July 31, 2022. RCTs that compared the efficacy between treatment regimens for severe melioidosis or eradication therapy of melioidosis, measured outcomes of in-hospital mortality, disease recurrence, drug discontinuation, or AEs, were included for review. A two-stage NMA with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to estimate the comparative efficacy of treatment regimens.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Fourteen RCTs were included in the review. Ceftazidime plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), ceftazidime plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and cefoperazone-sulbactam plus TMP-SMX had a lower mortality rate than other treatments and were ranked as the top three most appropriate treatments for severe melioidosis with the SUCRA of 79.7%, 66.6%, and 55.7%, respectively. However, these results were not statistically significant. For eradication therapy, treatment with doxycycline monotherapy for 20 weeks was associated with a significantly higher risk of disease recurrence than regimens containing TMP-SMX (i.e.,TMP-SMX for 20 weeks, TMP-SMX plus doxycycline plus chloramphenicol for more than 12 weeks, and TMP-SMX plus doxycycline for more than 12 weeks). According to the SUCRA, TMP-SMX for 20 weeks was ranked as the most efficacious eradication treatment (87.7%) with the lowest chance of drug discontinuation (86.4%), while TMP-SMX for 12 weeks had the lowest risk of AEs (95.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results found a non-significant benefit of ceftazidime plus G-CSF and ceftazidime plus TMP-SMX over other treatments for severe melioidosis. TMP-SMX for 20 weeks was associated with a lower recurrence rate and minimal risk of adverse drug events compared to other eradication treatments. However, the validity of our NMA may be compromised by the limited number of included studies and discrepancies in certain study parameters. Thus, additional well-designed RCTs are needed to improve the therapy of melioidosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20260,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":"17 6","pages":"e0011382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of all available treatments for severe melioidosis in decreasing hospital mortality and to identify eradication therapies with low disease recurrence rates and minimal risk of adverse drug events (AEs).

Methodology: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) were searched from Medline and Scopus databases from their inception until July 31, 2022. RCTs that compared the efficacy between treatment regimens for severe melioidosis or eradication therapy of melioidosis, measured outcomes of in-hospital mortality, disease recurrence, drug discontinuation, or AEs, were included for review. A two-stage NMA with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to estimate the comparative efficacy of treatment regimens.

Principal findings: Fourteen RCTs were included in the review. Ceftazidime plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), ceftazidime plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and cefoperazone-sulbactam plus TMP-SMX had a lower mortality rate than other treatments and were ranked as the top three most appropriate treatments for severe melioidosis with the SUCRA of 79.7%, 66.6%, and 55.7%, respectively. However, these results were not statistically significant. For eradication therapy, treatment with doxycycline monotherapy for 20 weeks was associated with a significantly higher risk of disease recurrence than regimens containing TMP-SMX (i.e.,TMP-SMX for 20 weeks, TMP-SMX plus doxycycline plus chloramphenicol for more than 12 weeks, and TMP-SMX plus doxycycline for more than 12 weeks). According to the SUCRA, TMP-SMX for 20 weeks was ranked as the most efficacious eradication treatment (87.7%) with the lowest chance of drug discontinuation (86.4%), while TMP-SMX for 12 weeks had the lowest risk of AEs (95.6%).

Conclusion: Our results found a non-significant benefit of ceftazidime plus G-CSF and ceftazidime plus TMP-SMX over other treatments for severe melioidosis. TMP-SMX for 20 weeks was associated with a lower recurrence rate and minimal risk of adverse drug events compared to other eradication treatments. However, the validity of our NMA may be compromised by the limited number of included studies and discrepancies in certain study parameters. Thus, additional well-designed RCTs are needed to improve the therapy of melioidosis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物治疗重度类鼻疽的疗效及根除类鼻疽的治疗:一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:本系统综述和网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在比较所有可用治疗严重类鼻疽的方法在降低医院死亡率方面的疗效,并确定具有低疾病复发率和最小药物不良事件(ae)风险的根除疗法。方法:从Medline和Scopus数据库中检索相关的随机对照试验(RCT),从其建立到2022年7月31日。比较严重类鼻疽治疗方案或根除类鼻疽治疗方案的疗效、住院死亡率、疾病复发、停药或ae的测量结果的随机对照试验被纳入评估。采用累积排序曲线下曲面(SUCRA)的两阶段NMA来评估治疗方案的比较疗效。主要发现:本综述纳入了14项随机对照试验。头孢他啶加粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)、头孢他啶加甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)和头孢哌酮-舒巴坦加TMP-SMX的死亡率均低于其他治疗,SUCRA分别为79.7%、66.6%和55.7%,是重度类鼻炎最适宜的前三种治疗方法。然而,这些结果没有统计学意义。对于根除治疗,与含有TMP-SMX的方案(即,TMP-SMX治疗20周,TMP-SMX +强力霉素+氯霉素治疗超过12周,TMP-SMX +强力霉素治疗超过12周)相比,强力霉素单药治疗20周与疾病复发风险显著升高相关。根据SUCRA, TMP-SMX治疗20周被评为最有效的根除治疗(87.7%),停药几率最低(86.4%),而TMP-SMX治疗12周的不良事件风险最低(95.6%)。结论:我们的研究结果发现头孢他啶加G-CSF和头孢他啶加TMP-SMX治疗严重类鼻炎的疗效不显著。与其他根除治疗相比,tp - smx治疗20周与较低的复发率和最小的药物不良事件风险相关。然而,我们的NMA的有效性可能会受到纳入研究数量有限和某些研究参数差异的影响。因此,需要更多设计良好的随机对照试验来改善类鼻疽病的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
723
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy. The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability. All aspects of these diseases are considered, including: Pathogenesis Clinical features Pharmacology and treatment Diagnosis Epidemiology Vector biology Vaccinology and prevention Demographic, ecological and social determinants Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).
期刊最新文献
Oral Chagas disease outbreak by bacaba juice ingestion: A century after Carlos Chagas’ discovery, the disease is still hard to manage Comparative evaluation of plasma biomarkers of Schistosoma haematobium infection in endemic populations from Burkina Faso Challenges in rescuing snakes to protect human lives and promote snake conservation in Tamil Nadu, India Repelling Aedes aegypti mosquitoes with electric fields using insulated conductor wires Exposure patterns and the risk factors of Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever virus amongst humans, livestock and selected wild animals at the human/livestock/wildlife interface in Isiolo County, upper eastern Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1