Vasopressin Use in the Support of Organ Donors: Physiological Rationale and Review of the Literature.

Sofiane Ouerd, Anne Julie Frenette, David Williamson, Karim Serri, Frederick D'Aragon, Daniel G Bichet, Emmanuel Charbonney
{"title":"Vasopressin Use in the Support of Organ Donors: Physiological Rationale and Review of the Literature.","authors":"Sofiane Ouerd,&nbsp;Anne Julie Frenette,&nbsp;David Williamson,&nbsp;Karim Serri,&nbsp;Frederick D'Aragon,&nbsp;Daniel G Bichet,&nbsp;Emmanuel Charbonney","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this review was to depict the physiological and clinical rationale for the use of vasopressin in hemodynamic support of organ donors. After summarizing the physiological, pharmacological concepts and preclinical findings, regarding vasopressin's pathophysiological impacts, we will present the available clinical data.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Detailed search strategies in PubMed, OVID Medline, and EMBASE were undertaken using Medical Subject Headings and Key Words.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Physiological articles regarding brain death, and preclinical animal and human studies about the use of vasopressin or analogs, as an intervention in organ support for donation, were considered.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text of articles to determine eligibility. Data encompassing models, population, methodology, outcomes, and relevant concepts were extracted.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Following brain death, profound reduction in sympathetic outflow is associated with reduced cardiac output, vascular tone, and hemodynamic instability in donors. In addition to reducing catecholamine needs and reversing diabetes insipidus, vasopressin has been shown to limit pulmonary injury and decrease systemic inflammatory response in animals. Several observational studies show the benefit of vasopressin on hemodynamic parameters and catecholamine sparing in donors. Small trials suggest that vasopressin increase organ procurement and have some survival benefit for recipients. However, the risk of bias is overall concerning, and therefore the quality of the evidence is deemed low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite potential impact on graft outcome and a protective effect through catecholamine support sparing, the benefit of vasopressin use in organ donors is based on low evidence. Well-designed observational and randomized controlled trials are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 4","pages":"0907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/d3/cc9-5-e0907.PMC10125506.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this review was to depict the physiological and clinical rationale for the use of vasopressin in hemodynamic support of organ donors. After summarizing the physiological, pharmacological concepts and preclinical findings, regarding vasopressin's pathophysiological impacts, we will present the available clinical data.

Data sources: Detailed search strategies in PubMed, OVID Medline, and EMBASE were undertaken using Medical Subject Headings and Key Words.

Study selection: Physiological articles regarding brain death, and preclinical animal and human studies about the use of vasopressin or analogs, as an intervention in organ support for donation, were considered.

Data extraction: Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text of articles to determine eligibility. Data encompassing models, population, methodology, outcomes, and relevant concepts were extracted.

Data synthesis: Following brain death, profound reduction in sympathetic outflow is associated with reduced cardiac output, vascular tone, and hemodynamic instability in donors. In addition to reducing catecholamine needs and reversing diabetes insipidus, vasopressin has been shown to limit pulmonary injury and decrease systemic inflammatory response in animals. Several observational studies show the benefit of vasopressin on hemodynamic parameters and catecholamine sparing in donors. Small trials suggest that vasopressin increase organ procurement and have some survival benefit for recipients. However, the risk of bias is overall concerning, and therefore the quality of the evidence is deemed low.

Conclusions: Despite potential impact on graft outcome and a protective effect through catecholamine support sparing, the benefit of vasopressin use in organ donors is based on low evidence. Well-designed observational and randomized controlled trials are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗利尿激素在器官供体支持中的应用:生理原理和文献综述。
本综述的目的是描述血管加压素在器官供体血流动力学支持中使用的生理和临床依据。在总结了抗利尿激素的生理、药理学概念和临床前研究结果后,我们将介绍现有的临床数据。数据来源:使用医学主题词和关键词在PubMed、OVID Medline和EMBASE中进行详细的搜索策略。研究选择:考虑了关于脑死亡的生理学文章,以及关于使用抗利尿激素或类似物作为器官捐献支持干预的临床前动物和人类研究。数据提取:两位作者独立筛选文章标题、摘要和全文以确定是否合格。提取了包含模型、人口、方法、结果和相关概念的数据。资料综合:脑死亡后,供体交感神经流出量显著减少与心输出量减少、血管张力降低和血流动力学不稳定有关。除了减少儿茶酚胺需求和逆转尿崩症外,加压素已被证明可以限制肺损伤和减少全身炎症反应。几项观察性研究显示抗利尿激素对供体血液动力学参数和儿茶酚胺节约的益处。小型试验表明,抗利尿激素增加器官获取,对受者有一定的生存益处。然而,偏倚的风险总体上令人担忧,因此证据的质量被认为是低的。结论:尽管通过儿茶酚胺支持保留对移植物预后有潜在影响和保护作用,但在器官供体中使用抗利尿激素的益处基于低证据。设计良好的观察性和随机对照试验是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1