Developing an LSTM Model to Identify Surgical Site Infections using Electronic Healthcare Records.

Amber C Kiser, Karen Eilbeck, Brian T Bucher
{"title":"Developing an LSTM Model to Identify Surgical Site Infections using Electronic Healthcare Records.","authors":"Amber C Kiser, Karen Eilbeck, Brian T Bucher","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, hospitals and healthcare providers have made efforts to reduce surgical site infections as they are a major cause of surgical complications, a prominent reason for hospital readmission, and associated with significantly increased healthcare costs. Traditional surveillance methods for SSI rely on manual chart review, which can be laborious and costly. To assist the chart review process, we developed a long short-term memory (LSTM) model using structured electronic health record data to identify SSI. The top LSTM model resulted in an average precision (AP) of 0.570 [95% CI 0.567, 0.573] and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.905 [95% CI 0.904, 0.906] compared to the top traditional machine learning model, a random forest, which achieved 0.552 [95% CI 0.549, 0.555] AP and 0.899 [95% CI 0.898, 0.900] AUROC. Our LSTM model represents a step toward automated surveillance of SSIs, a critical component of quality improvement mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":72181,"journal":{"name":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10283140/pdf/2161.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, hospitals and healthcare providers have made efforts to reduce surgical site infections as they are a major cause of surgical complications, a prominent reason for hospital readmission, and associated with significantly increased healthcare costs. Traditional surveillance methods for SSI rely on manual chart review, which can be laborious and costly. To assist the chart review process, we developed a long short-term memory (LSTM) model using structured electronic health record data to identify SSI. The top LSTM model resulted in an average precision (AP) of 0.570 [95% CI 0.567, 0.573] and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.905 [95% CI 0.904, 0.906] compared to the top traditional machine learning model, a random forest, which achieved 0.552 [95% CI 0.549, 0.555] AP and 0.899 [95% CI 0.898, 0.900] AUROC. Our LSTM model represents a step toward automated surveillance of SSIs, a critical component of quality improvement mechanisms.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发 LSTM 模型,利用电子医疗记录识别手术部位感染。
最近,医院和医疗服务提供者都在努力减少手术部位感染,因为手术部位感染是导致手术并发症的主要原因,也是导致再次入院的主要原因,同时还会导致医疗成本大幅增加。传统的 SSI 监测方法依赖于人工病历审查,既费力又费钱。为了协助病历审查过程,我们利用结构化电子病历数据开发了一个长短期记忆(LSTM)模型,用于识别 SSI。顶级 LSTM 模型的平均精确度 (AP) 为 0.570 [95% CI 0.567, 0.573],接收者工作特征曲线下面积 (AUROC) 为 0.905 [95% CI 0.904, 0.906],而顶级传统机器学习模型(随机森林)的平均精确度 (AP) 为 0.552 [95% CI 0.549, 0.555],接收者工作特征曲线下面积 (AUROC) 为 0.899 [95% CI 0.898, 0.900]。我们的 LSTM 模型向 SSI 自动监控迈出了一步,而 SSI 是质量改进机制的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clarifying Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Genetic Associations Observed in Biobanks via Mediation Analysis of Smoking. CLASSify: A Web-Based Tool for Machine Learning. Clinical Note Structural Knowledge Improves Word Sense Disambiguation. Cluster Analysis of Cortical Amyloid Burden for Identifying Imaging-driven Subtypes in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Comparative Analysis of Fusion Strategies for Imaging and Non-imaging Data - Use-case of Hospital Discharge Prediction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1