Online enquiries and health concerns - a survey of German general practitioners regarding experiences and strategies in patient care.

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg Pub Date : 2023-04-12 DOI:10.1007/s10389-023-01909-1
Julian Wangler, Michael Jansky
{"title":"Online enquiries and health concerns - a survey of German general practitioners regarding experiences and strategies in patient care.","authors":"Julian Wangler,&nbsp;Michael Jansky","doi":"10.1007/s10389-023-01909-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Increasingly at GP practices, patients appear who are extremely worried as a result of health information researched online and consequently affected by doubts and concerns. The study highlights GP attitudes and experiences with regard to this patient group. Moreover, it identifies strategies adopted by GPs to respond appropriately to worried or scared patients.</p><p><strong>Subject and methods: </strong>In the German federal states of Baden-Württemberg, Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland, 2532 GPs were surveyed between June and August 2022. Owing to the explorative nature of the study, a descriptive analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total respondents, 77% deemed the current problem of internet-related health concerns to be a major challenge in everyday practice. The implications affect patients' mental stability and expectations towards the doctor (esp. demand for further instrumental diagnosis, 83%). One doctor in five (20%) has experienced the termination of patient contact because the relationship with the patient was no longer possible due to the patient's uncontrolled online information behaviour. To respond to worried or scared patients, the respondents generally ask certain patient groups about online research (39%) and take this into account in the doctor-patient discussion (23%). Furthermore, the respondents use a detailed explanation of the diagnosis and/or treatment (65%) and recommend websites that they consider reputable (66%). Some of the doctors prefer a joint examination of the information researched by the patient (55%) as well as to explain the benefits and risks of online research (43%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many GPs demonstrate a high level of awareness and sensitivity with regard to extensive online research and potentially worried patients. It seems advisable to actively address the online search for information in the patient consultation to prevent possible negative effects on the doctor-patient relationship and to actively involve the patient. In this respect, it would also be worth considering expanding the medical history to include the dimension of online searching.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-023-01909-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":29967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10096108/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-01909-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: Increasingly at GP practices, patients appear who are extremely worried as a result of health information researched online and consequently affected by doubts and concerns. The study highlights GP attitudes and experiences with regard to this patient group. Moreover, it identifies strategies adopted by GPs to respond appropriately to worried or scared patients.

Subject and methods: In the German federal states of Baden-Württemberg, Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland, 2532 GPs were surveyed between June and August 2022. Owing to the explorative nature of the study, a descriptive analysis was conducted.

Results: Of the total respondents, 77% deemed the current problem of internet-related health concerns to be a major challenge in everyday practice. The implications affect patients' mental stability and expectations towards the doctor (esp. demand for further instrumental diagnosis, 83%). One doctor in five (20%) has experienced the termination of patient contact because the relationship with the patient was no longer possible due to the patient's uncontrolled online information behaviour. To respond to worried or scared patients, the respondents generally ask certain patient groups about online research (39%) and take this into account in the doctor-patient discussion (23%). Furthermore, the respondents use a detailed explanation of the diagnosis and/or treatment (65%) and recommend websites that they consider reputable (66%). Some of the doctors prefer a joint examination of the information researched by the patient (55%) as well as to explain the benefits and risks of online research (43%).

Conclusion: Many GPs demonstrate a high level of awareness and sensitivity with regard to extensive online research and potentially worried patients. It seems advisable to actively address the online search for information in the patient consultation to prevent possible negative effects on the doctor-patient relationship and to actively involve the patient. In this respect, it would also be worth considering expanding the medical history to include the dimension of online searching.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-023-01909-1.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线咨询和健康问题-一项针对德国全科医生的关于患者护理经验和策略的调查。
目的:在全科医生诊所,越来越多的患者因在线研究的健康信息而感到极度担忧,从而受到怀疑和担忧的影响。该研究强调了全科医生对这一患者群体的态度和经验。此外,它还确定了全科医生为应对担忧或恐惧的患者而采取的策略。主题和方法:2022年6月至8月,在德国联邦巴登-符腾堡州、莱茵兰-普法尔茨州和萨尔州,对2532名全科医生进行了调查。由于本研究具有探索性,因此进行了描述性分析。结果:在所有受访者中,77%的人认为当前与互联网相关的健康问题是日常实践中的一大挑战。影响患者的心理稳定性和对医生的期望(尤其是对进一步仪器诊断的需求,83%)。五分之一(20%)的医生经历过终止与患者的联系,因为由于患者不受控制的在线信息行为,与患者的关系不再可能。为了回应担心或害怕的患者,受访者通常会向某些患者群体询问在线研究(39%),并在医患讨论中考虑到这一点(23%)。此外,受访者对诊断和/或治疗进行了详细解释(65%),并推荐了他们认为信誉良好的网站(66%)。一些医生更喜欢对患者研究的信息进行联合检查(55%),并解释在线研究的好处和风险(43%)。结论:许多全科医生对广泛的在线研究和潜在的担忧患者表现出高度的意识和敏感性。在患者咨询中积极处理在线搜索信息的问题似乎是可取的,以防止对医患关系可能产生的负面影响,并积极让患者参与进来。在这方面,还值得考虑将病史扩展到包括在线搜索的维度。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s10389-023-01909-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The relationship between life satisfaction, personal health, quality of life, and medication adherence among adolescents living with HIV in southwestern Uganda. Self-reported health among immigrants in Luxembourg: insights from a nationally representative sample. Levelling Up for health in towns? Development of a new deprivation index: the 'Stronger Towns Index' and its association with self-rated health and migration in England, between 2001 and 2011. Social networks and health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study among older adults in the Netherlands. Racial disparities in lifestyle habits and dietary patterns in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1