Demographic and Geographic Variation in Fatal Drug Overdoses in the United States, 1999-2020.

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1177/00027162231154348
Shannon M Monnat
{"title":"Demographic and Geographic Variation in Fatal Drug Overdoses in the United States, 1999-2020.","authors":"Shannon M Monnat","doi":"10.1177/00027162231154348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The U.S. drug overdose crisis has been described as a national disaster that has affected all communities. But overdose rates are higher among some subpopulations and in some places than they are in others. This article describes demographic (sex, racial/ethnic, age) and geographic variation in fatal drug overdose rates in the United States from 1999 to 2020. Across most of that timespan, rates were highest among young and middle-age (25-54 years) White and American Indian males and middle-age and older (45+ years) Black males. Rates have been consistently high in Appalachia, but the crisis has spread to several other regions in recent years, and rates are high across the urban-rural continuum. Opioids have been the main contributor, but overdoses involving cocaine and psychostimulants have also increased dramatically in recent years, demonstrating that our problem is bigger than opioids. Evidence suggests that supply-side interventions are unlikely to be effective in reducing overdoses. I argue that the U.S. should invest in policies that address the upstream structural drivers of the crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48352,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10292656/pdf/nihms-1892705.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162231154348","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. drug overdose crisis has been described as a national disaster that has affected all communities. But overdose rates are higher among some subpopulations and in some places than they are in others. This article describes demographic (sex, racial/ethnic, age) and geographic variation in fatal drug overdose rates in the United States from 1999 to 2020. Across most of that timespan, rates were highest among young and middle-age (25-54 years) White and American Indian males and middle-age and older (45+ years) Black males. Rates have been consistently high in Appalachia, but the crisis has spread to several other regions in recent years, and rates are high across the urban-rural continuum. Opioids have been the main contributor, but overdoses involving cocaine and psychostimulants have also increased dramatically in recent years, demonstrating that our problem is bigger than opioids. Evidence suggests that supply-side interventions are unlikely to be effective in reducing overdoses. I argue that the U.S. should invest in policies that address the upstream structural drivers of the crisis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1999-2020 年美国致命药物过量的人口和地理差异。
美国的吸毒过量危机被描述为一场全国性的灾难,影响到了所有社区。但是,某些亚人群和某些地方的吸毒过量率要高于其他地方。本文介绍了 1999 年至 2020 年期间美国人口(性别、种族/民族、年龄)和地域在致命吸毒过量率方面的差异。在这一时期的大部分时间里,中青年(25-54 岁)白人和美洲印第安人男性以及中老年(45 岁以上)黑人男性的吸毒过量致死率最高。阿巴拉契亚地区的发病率一直居高不下,但近年来这一危机已蔓延到其他几个地区,而且城乡之间的发病率都很高。阿片类药物是主要的致病因素,但近年来涉及可卡因和精神兴奋剂的过量用药也急剧增加,这表明我们的问题比阿片类药物更大。有证据表明,供应方干预措施不可能有效减少过量吸毒。我认为,美国应投资于解决危机上游结构性驱动因素的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The AAPSS seeks to promote the progress of the social sciences and the use of social science knowledge in the enrichment of public understanding and in the development of public policy. It does so by fostering multidisciplinary understanding of important questions among those who create, disseminate, and apply the social sciences, and by encouraging and celebrating talented people who produce and use research to enhance public understanding of important social problems.
期刊最新文献
Who Uses the Social Safety Net? Trends in Public Benefit Use among American Households with Children, 1980-2020. Refocusing Civic Education: Developing the Skills Young People Need to Engage in Democracy Civic Preparation of American Youth: Reflective Patriotism and Our Constitutional Democracy Case Studies of Effective Learning Climates for Civic Reasoning and Discussion Assessing the Civic-Building Capacities of Schools: Early Findings from a Survey of Parents and Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1