You are how (and where) you search? Comparative analysis of web search behavior using web tracking data.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS Journal of Computational Social Science Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1007/s42001-023-00208-9
Aleksandra Urman, Mykola Makhortykh
{"title":"You are how (and where) you search? Comparative analysis of web search behavior using web tracking data.","authors":"Aleksandra Urman,&nbsp;Mykola Makhortykh","doi":"10.1007/s42001-023-00208-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, we conduct a comparative analysis of web search behaviors in Switzerland and Germany. For this aim, we rely on a combination of web tracking data and survey data collected over a period of 2 months from users in Germany (<i>n</i> = 558) and Switzerland (<i>n</i> = 563). We find that web search accounts for 13% of all desktop browsing, with the share being higher in Switzerland than in Germany. In over 50% of cases users clicked on the first search result, with over 97% of all clicks being made on the first page of search outputs. Most users rely on Google when conducting searches, with some differences observed in users' preferences for other engines across demographic groups. Further, we observe differences in the temporal patterns of web search use between women and men, marking the necessity of disaggregating data by gender in observational studies regarding online information seeking behaviors. Our findings highlight the contextual differences in web search behavior across countries and demographic groups that should be taken into account when examining search behavior and the potential effects of web search result quality on societies and individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":29946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10155157/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-023-00208-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this article, we conduct a comparative analysis of web search behaviors in Switzerland and Germany. For this aim, we rely on a combination of web tracking data and survey data collected over a period of 2 months from users in Germany (n = 558) and Switzerland (n = 563). We find that web search accounts for 13% of all desktop browsing, with the share being higher in Switzerland than in Germany. In over 50% of cases users clicked on the first search result, with over 97% of all clicks being made on the first page of search outputs. Most users rely on Google when conducting searches, with some differences observed in users' preferences for other engines across demographic groups. Further, we observe differences in the temporal patterns of web search use between women and men, marking the necessity of disaggregating data by gender in observational studies regarding online information seeking behaviors. Our findings highlight the contextual differences in web search behavior across countries and demographic groups that should be taken into account when examining search behavior and the potential effects of web search result quality on societies and individuals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你是如何(在哪里)搜索的?使用网络跟踪数据对网络搜索行为进行比较分析。
在这篇文章中,我们对瑞士和德国的网络搜索行为进行了比较分析。为此,我们结合了网络跟踪数据和在2个月内从德国用户那里收集的调查数据(n = 558)和瑞士(n = 563)。我们发现,网络搜索占所有桌面浏览的13%,瑞士的比例高于德国。在超过50%的情况下,用户点击了第一个搜索结果,超过97%的点击是在搜索输出的第一页上进行的。大多数用户在进行搜索时都依赖谷歌,不同人口群体的用户对其他引擎的偏好存在一些差异。此外,我们观察到女性和男性在网络搜索使用的时间模式上存在差异,这表明在关于在线信息寻求行为的观察性研究中,有必要按性别分类数据。我们的研究结果强调了不同国家和人口群体的网络搜索行为的背景差异,在研究搜索行为以及网络搜索结果质量对社会和个人的潜在影响时,应该考虑这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Social Science
Journal of Computational Social Science SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Digital intermediaries in pandemic times: social media and the role of bots in communicating emotions and stress about Coronavirus Correction to: The AI community building the future? A quantitative analysis of development activity on Hugging Face Hub Comparing location-specific and location-open social media data: methodological lessons from a study of blaming of minorities on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic Uncovering electric vehicle ownership disparities using K-means clustering analysis: A case study of Austin, Texas MAS-Bench: a benchmarking for parameter calibration of multi-agent crowd simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1