A time-series COVID-19 policy outcome analysis tool to measure human behavior from a herd instinct perspective.

IF 3.1 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Health and Technology Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.1007/s12553-023-00759-x
Toshiki Miyagawa, Yoshiyasu Takefuji
{"title":"A time-series COVID-19 policy outcome analysis tool to measure human behavior from a herd instinct perspective.","authors":"Toshiki Miyagawa,&nbsp;Yoshiyasu Takefuji","doi":"10.1007/s12553-023-00759-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There are 47 municipalities and prefectures in Japan that operate similar COVID-19 policies in a unified manner. There are significant differences regarding their policy outcomes. In order to investigate when the outcomes are different, we made a COVID-19 policy outcome analysis tool, jpcovid for evaluating time-series scores of individual prefectures, not a policy analysis tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scoring policies is based on a single population mortality metric: the number of COVID-19 deaths divided by the population in millions from a demographic perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although uniformed policies have been adopted by the 47 prefectures in Japan, there are significant differences in the calculated scores among the 47 prefectures. This difference can be caused by differences in the herding instincts of the community with COVID-19 variants. The herd instinct is an inherent tendency to associate with others and follow the group's behavior or a behavior wherein people tend to react to the actions of others without considering the reason. The snapshot scoring tool, jpscore showed that Niigata has the best score of 67.9 while Osaka has the worst score of 727.9. jpcovid allows users to identify when herd instincts made changes in time-series scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the world's first large-scale measurement on the herd instinct of prefectures in Japan. The proposed method can be applied to other countries in general.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-023-00759-x.</p>","PeriodicalId":12941,"journal":{"name":"Health and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252164/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00759-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: There are 47 municipalities and prefectures in Japan that operate similar COVID-19 policies in a unified manner. There are significant differences regarding their policy outcomes. In order to investigate when the outcomes are different, we made a COVID-19 policy outcome analysis tool, jpcovid for evaluating time-series scores of individual prefectures, not a policy analysis tool.

Methods: Scoring policies is based on a single population mortality metric: the number of COVID-19 deaths divided by the population in millions from a demographic perspective.

Results: Although uniformed policies have been adopted by the 47 prefectures in Japan, there are significant differences in the calculated scores among the 47 prefectures. This difference can be caused by differences in the herding instincts of the community with COVID-19 variants. The herd instinct is an inherent tendency to associate with others and follow the group's behavior or a behavior wherein people tend to react to the actions of others without considering the reason. The snapshot scoring tool, jpscore showed that Niigata has the best score of 67.9 while Osaka has the worst score of 727.9. jpcovid allows users to identify when herd instincts made changes in time-series scores.

Conclusions: This is the world's first large-scale measurement on the herd instinct of prefectures in Japan. The proposed method can be applied to other countries in general.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-023-00759-x.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间序列新冠肺炎政策结果分析工具,从群体本能的角度衡量人类行为。
目的:日本有47个市和县统一实施类似的新冠肺炎政策。他们的政策结果存在显著差异。为了调查结果何时不同,我们制作了一个新冠肺炎政策结果分析工具jpcovid,用于评估各个县的时间序列分数,而不是一个政策分析工具。方法:评分政策基于单一的人口死亡率指标:从人口统计学角度看,新冠肺炎死亡人数除以百万人口。结果:尽管日本47个都道府县采取了统一的政策,但47个都府县的计算得分存在显著差异。这种差异可能是由新冠肺炎变异社区的羊群本能差异引起的。群体本能是一种与他人交往并遵循群体行为的内在倾向,或者是一种人们倾向于对他人的行为做出反应而不考虑原因的行为。快照评分工具jpscore显示,新泻的得分最好,为67.9分,大阪的得分最差,为727.9分。jpcovid允许用户识别群体本能何时在时间序列分数中发生变化。结论:这是世界上第一次大规模测量日本都道府县的从众本能。所提出的方法一般可应用于其他国家。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s12553-023-00759-x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health and Technology
Health and Technology MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Health and Technology is the first truly cross-disciplinary journal on issues related to health technologies addressing all professions relating to health, care and health technology.The journal constitutes an information platform connecting medical technology and informatics with the needs of care, health care professionals and patients. Thus, medical physicists and biomedical/clinical engineers are encouraged to write articles not only for their colleagues, but directed to all other groups of readers as well, and vice versa.By its nature, the journal presents and discusses hot subjects including but not limited to patient safety, patient empowerment, disease surveillance and management, e-health and issues concerning data security, privacy, reliability and management, data mining and knowledge exchange as well as health prevention. The journal also addresses the medical, financial, social, educational and safety aspects of health technologies as well as health technology assessment and management, including issues such security, efficacy, cost in comparison to the benefit, as well as social, legal and ethical implications.This journal is a communicative source for the health work force (physicians, nurses, medical physicists, clinical engineers, biomedical engineers, hospital engineers, etc.), the ministries of health, hospital management, self-employed doctors, health care providers and regulatory agencies, the medical technology industry, patients'' associations, universities (biomedical and clinical engineering, medical physics, medical informatics, biology, medicine and public health as well as health economics programs), research institutes and professional, scientific and technical organizations.Health and Technology is jointly published by Springer and the IUPESM (International Union for Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine) in cooperation with the World Health Organization.
期刊最新文献
Health disparity in digital health technology design Training protocol for driving power wheelchairs using virtual environment: preliminary results from a pilot study COVID-19 vaccine prediction based on an interpretable CNN-LSTM model with three-stage feature engineering Detection of Cardio Vascular abnormalities using gradient descent optimization and CNN Unsupervised machine learning for disease prediction: a comparative performance analysis using multiple datasets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1