Effect of Abutment Cooling on Reverse Torque Values of Abutment Screws: An In Vitro Study.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.11607/jomi.9499
Nirosa Srimurugan-Thayanithi, Samir Abou-Ayash, Burak Yilmaz, Martin Schimmel, Urs Brägger
{"title":"Effect of Abutment Cooling on Reverse Torque Values of Abutment Screws: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Nirosa Srimurugan-Thayanithi,&nbsp;Samir Abou-Ayash,&nbsp;Burak Yilmaz,&nbsp;Martin Schimmel,&nbsp;Urs Brägger","doi":"10.11607/jomi.9499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the effect of cooling on the reverse torque values of different abutments in bone-level and tissue-level implants. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in reverse torque values of abutment screws when cooled and uncooled implant abutments were compared. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Bone-level and tissue-level implants (Straumann, each n = 36) were placed in synthetic bone blocks and subdivided into three groups (each n = 12) based on the abutment type (titanium base, cementable abutment, abutment for screw-retained restorations). All abutment screws were tightened to 35 Ncm torque. In half of the implants, a dry ice rod was applied on the abutments close to the implant-abutment connection for 60 seconds before untightening the abutment screw. The remaining implant-abutment pairs were not cooled. The maximum reverse torque values were recorded using a digital torque meter. The tightening and untightening procedure was repeated three times for each implant including cooling for the test groups, resulting in 18 reverse torque values per group. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the effect of cooling and abutment type on the measurements. Post hoc <i>t</i> tests were used to make group comparisons (α = .05). The <i>P</i> values of post hoc tests were corrected for multiple testing using the Bonferroni-Holm method. <b>Results:</b> The null hypothesis was rejected. Cooling and abutment type significantly affected the reverse torque values in bone-level implants (<i>P</i> = .004) but not in tissue-level implants (<i>P</i> = .051). The reverse torque values of bone-level implants significantly decreased after cooling (20.31 ± 2.55 Ncm vs 17.61 ± 2.49 Ncm). Overall mean reverse torque values were significantly higher in bone-level implants compared to tissue-level implants (18.96 ± 2.84 Ncm vs 16.13 ± 3.17 Ncm; <i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Cooling of the implant abutment led to a significant decrease in reverse torque values in bone-level implants and may therefore be recommended as a pretreatment before the application of procedures to remove a stuck implant part.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9499","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of cooling on the reverse torque values of different abutments in bone-level and tissue-level implants. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in reverse torque values of abutment screws when cooled and uncooled implant abutments were compared. Materials and Methods: Bone-level and tissue-level implants (Straumann, each n = 36) were placed in synthetic bone blocks and subdivided into three groups (each n = 12) based on the abutment type (titanium base, cementable abutment, abutment for screw-retained restorations). All abutment screws were tightened to 35 Ncm torque. In half of the implants, a dry ice rod was applied on the abutments close to the implant-abutment connection for 60 seconds before untightening the abutment screw. The remaining implant-abutment pairs were not cooled. The maximum reverse torque values were recorded using a digital torque meter. The tightening and untightening procedure was repeated three times for each implant including cooling for the test groups, resulting in 18 reverse torque values per group. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the effect of cooling and abutment type on the measurements. Post hoc t tests were used to make group comparisons (α = .05). The P values of post hoc tests were corrected for multiple testing using the Bonferroni-Holm method. Results: The null hypothesis was rejected. Cooling and abutment type significantly affected the reverse torque values in bone-level implants (P = .004) but not in tissue-level implants (P = .051). The reverse torque values of bone-level implants significantly decreased after cooling (20.31 ± 2.55 Ncm vs 17.61 ± 2.49 Ncm). Overall mean reverse torque values were significantly higher in bone-level implants compared to tissue-level implants (18.96 ± 2.84 Ncm vs 16.13 ± 3.17 Ncm; P < .001). Conclusion: Cooling of the implant abutment led to a significant decrease in reverse torque values in bone-level implants and may therefore be recommended as a pretreatment before the application of procedures to remove a stuck implant part.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基台冷却对基台螺钉反向扭矩值影响的体外研究。
目的:探讨冷却对骨水平和组织水平种植体不同基牙反向扭矩值的影响。原假设是在比较冷却和未冷却的种植体基牙时,基牙螺钉的反向扭矩值没有差异。材料与方法:骨水平种植体和组织水平种植体(Straumann,每个n = 36)放置在合成骨块中,并根据基台类型(钛基、水泥基台、螺钉保留修复基台)分为三组(每个n = 12)。所有基台螺钉均拧紧至35 Ncm扭矩。在一半的种植体中,在靠近种植体-基台连接的基台上应用干冰棒60秒,然后松开基台螺钉。剩余的种植-基牙对不进行冷却。使用数字扭矩计记录最大反向扭矩值。每个植入物重复拧紧和松开三次,包括实验组的冷却,每组产生18个反向扭矩值。采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)分析冷却方式和基台类型对测量结果的影响。采用事后t检验进行组间比较(α = 0.05)。使用Bonferroni-Holm方法对事后检验的P值进行多次检验校正。结果:零假设被否定。冷却和基台类型显著影响骨水平种植体的反向扭矩值(P = 0.004),而对组织水平种植体无显著影响(P = 0.051)。骨水平种植体的反向扭矩值在冷却后明显降低(20.31±2.55 Ncm vs 17.61±2.49 Ncm)。骨水平种植体的总体平均反向扭矩值明显高于组织水平种植体(18.96±2.84 Ncm vs 16.13±3.17 Ncm);P < 0.001)。结论:种植体基台的冷却导致骨水平种植体的反向扭矩值显著降低,因此可能被推荐作为应用移除卡套种植体部分程序之前的预处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Mentorship in academic musculoskeletal radiology: perspectives from a junior faculty member. Underlying synovial sarcoma undiagnosed for more than 20 years in a patient with regional pain: a case report. Sacrococcygeal chordoma with spontaneous regression due to a large hemorrhagic component. Associations of cumulative voriconazole dose, treatment duration, and alkaline phosphatase with voriconazole-induced periostitis. Can the presence of SLAP-5 lesions be predicted by using the critical shoulder angle in traumatic anterior shoulder instability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1