Genome comparison reveals that Halobacterium salinarum 63-R2 is the origin of the twin laboratory strains NRC-1 and R1

IF 3.9 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY MicrobiologyOpen Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1002/mbo3.1365
Friedhelm Pfeiffer, Mike Dyall-Smith
{"title":"Genome comparison reveals that Halobacterium salinarum 63-R2 is the origin of the twin laboratory strains NRC-1 and R1","authors":"Friedhelm Pfeiffer,&nbsp;Mike Dyall-Smith","doi":"10.1002/mbo3.1365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The genome of <i>Halobacterium</i> strain 63-R2 was recently reported and provides the opportunity to resolve long-standing issues regarding the source of two widely used model strains of <i>Halobacterium salinarum</i>, NRC-1 and R1. Strain 63-R2 was isolated in 1934 from a salted buffalo hide (epithet “cutirubra”), along with another strain from a salted cow hide (91-R6<sup>T</sup>, epithet “salinaria,” the type strain of <i>Hbt. salinarum</i>). Both strains belong to the same species according to genome-based taxonomy analysis (TYGS), with chromosome sequences showing 99.64% identity over 1.85 Mb. The chromosome of strain 63-R2 is 99.99% identical to the two laboratory strains NRC-1 and R1, with only five indels, excluding the mobilome. The two reported plasmids of strain 63-R2 share their architecture with plasmids of strain R1 (pHcu43/pHS4, 99.89% identity; pHcu235/pHS3, 100.0% identity). We detected and assembled additional plasmids using PacBio reads deposited at the SRA database, further corroborating that strain differences are minimal. One plasmid, pHcu190 (190,816 bp) corresponds to pHS1 (strain R1) but is even more similar in architecture to pNRC100 (strain NRC-1). Another plasmid, pHcu229, assembled partially and completed in silico (229,124 bp), shares most of its architecture with pHS2 (strain R1). In deviating regions, it corresponds to pNRC200 (strain NRC-1). Further architectural differences between the laboratory strain plasmids are not unique, but are present in strain 63-R2, which contains characteristics from both of them. Based on these observations, it is proposed that the early twentieth-century isolate 63-R2 is the immediate ancestor of the twin laboratory strains NRC-1 and R1.</p>","PeriodicalId":18573,"journal":{"name":"MicrobiologyOpen","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mbo3.1365","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MicrobiologyOpen","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mbo3.1365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The genome of Halobacterium strain 63-R2 was recently reported and provides the opportunity to resolve long-standing issues regarding the source of two widely used model strains of Halobacterium salinarum, NRC-1 and R1. Strain 63-R2 was isolated in 1934 from a salted buffalo hide (epithet “cutirubra”), along with another strain from a salted cow hide (91-R6T, epithet “salinaria,” the type strain of Hbt. salinarum). Both strains belong to the same species according to genome-based taxonomy analysis (TYGS), with chromosome sequences showing 99.64% identity over 1.85 Mb. The chromosome of strain 63-R2 is 99.99% identical to the two laboratory strains NRC-1 and R1, with only five indels, excluding the mobilome. The two reported plasmids of strain 63-R2 share their architecture with plasmids of strain R1 (pHcu43/pHS4, 99.89% identity; pHcu235/pHS3, 100.0% identity). We detected and assembled additional plasmids using PacBio reads deposited at the SRA database, further corroborating that strain differences are minimal. One plasmid, pHcu190 (190,816 bp) corresponds to pHS1 (strain R1) but is even more similar in architecture to pNRC100 (strain NRC-1). Another plasmid, pHcu229, assembled partially and completed in silico (229,124 bp), shares most of its architecture with pHS2 (strain R1). In deviating regions, it corresponds to pNRC200 (strain NRC-1). Further architectural differences between the laboratory strain plasmids are not unique, but are present in strain 63-R2, which contains characteristics from both of them. Based on these observations, it is proposed that the early twentieth-century isolate 63-R2 is the immediate ancestor of the twin laboratory strains NRC-1 and R1.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基因组比较表明,盐盐杆菌63-R2是NRC-1和R1双胞胎实验室菌株的起源
最近报道了盐杆菌菌株63-R2的基因组,为解决关于两种广泛使用的盐杆菌模型菌株NRC-1和R1来源的长期问题提供了机会。菌株63-R2于1934年从盐牛皮(绰号“cutirubra”)中分离出来,同时从盐牛皮(91-R6T,绰号“salinaria”)中分离出另一株Hbt型菌株。salinarum)。根据基因组分类分析(TYGS),两菌株属于同一物种,染色体序列在1.85 Mb以上具有99.64%的同源性。菌株63-R2的染色体与实验室菌株NRC-1和R1的染色体一致性为99.99%,除移动组外,只有5个索引。报道的菌株63-R2的两个质粒与菌株R1的质粒结构相同(pHcu43/pHS4,同源性99.89%;pHcu235/pHS3, 100.0%同一性)。我们使用存放在SRA数据库中的PacBio reads检测并组装了额外的质粒,进一步证实了菌株差异很小。其中一个质粒pHcu190 (190,816 bp)与pHS1(菌株R1)对应,但在结构上与pNRC100(菌株NRC-1)更相似。另一个质粒,pHcu229,部分组装并在硅上完成(229,124 bp),与pHS2(菌株R1)共享大部分结构。在偏离区域对应于pNRC200(菌株NRC-1)。实验室菌株质粒之间的进一步结构差异不是唯一的,但在菌株63-R2中存在,它包含了两者的特征。基于这些观察结果,我们提出,20世纪早期分离物63-R2是实验室菌株NRC-1和R1的直系祖先。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MicrobiologyOpen
MicrobiologyOpen MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: MicrobiologyOpen is a peer reviewed, fully open access, broad-scope, and interdisciplinary journal delivering rapid decisions and fast publication of microbial science, a field which is undergoing a profound and exciting evolution in this post-genomic era. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish quality research in both fundamental and applied microbiology. Our goal is to publish articles that stimulate discussion and debate, as well as add to our knowledge base and further the understanding of microbial interactions and microbial processes. MicrobiologyOpen gives prompt and equal consideration to articles reporting theoretical, experimental, applied, and descriptive work in all aspects of bacteriology, virology, mycology and protistology, including, but not limited to: - agriculture - antimicrobial resistance - astrobiology - biochemistry - biotechnology - cell and molecular biology - clinical microbiology - computational, systems, and synthetic microbiology - environmental science - evolutionary biology, ecology, and systematics - food science and technology - genetics and genomics - geobiology and earth science - host-microbe interactions - infectious diseases - natural products discovery - pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry - physiology - plant pathology - veterinary microbiology We will consider submissions across unicellular and cell-cluster organisms: prokaryotes (bacteria, archaea) and eukaryotes (fungi, protists, microalgae, lichens), as well as viruses and prions infecting or interacting with microorganisms, plants and animals, including genetic, biochemical, biophysical, bioinformatic and structural analyses. The journal features Original Articles (including full Research articles, Method articles, and Short Communications), Commentaries, Reviews, and Editorials. Original papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the article. We also support confirmatory research and aim to work with authors to meet reviewer expectations. MicrobiologyOpen publishes articles submitted directly to the journal and those referred from other Wiley journals.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring the Persistence of Pseudomonas sivasensis Strain CF10PS3 in Cereal Fields The Effects of Carbonate on Candida albicans Filamentation, Biofilm Formation, and Antifungal Resistance Bacillus xiamenensis Inhibits the Growth of Moraxella osloensis by Producing Indole-3-Carboxaldehyde Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods for Microbial Community Profiling in Deadwood Decomposition Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1