Current Landscape of Uveitis Specialists in the United States.

Edmund Tsui, Eric L Crowell, Sapna Gangaputra, Kareem Moussa, Jessica G Shantha, Alexander J Shusko, Ian A Thompson, Derek C Pham, Nicholas J Jackson, Arthi G Venkat
{"title":"Current Landscape of Uveitis Specialists in the United States.","authors":"Edmund Tsui,&nbsp;Eric L Crowell,&nbsp;Sapna Gangaputra,&nbsp;Kareem Moussa,&nbsp;Jessica G Shantha,&nbsp;Alexander J Shusko,&nbsp;Ian A Thompson,&nbsp;Derek C Pham,&nbsp;Nicholas J Jackson,&nbsp;Arthi G Venkat","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1755581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  This study characterizes the current landscape of uveitis specialists and their practice settings in the United States. <b>Methods</b>  An anonymous Internet-based survey with questions pertaining to training history and practice characteristics was distributed via REDCap to the American Uveitis Society and Young Uveitis Specialists listservs. <b>Results</b>  Forty-eight uveitis specialists in the United States responded to the survey out of 174 uveitis specialists that identify as practicing in the United States. Twenty-five of 48 respondents (52%) completed an additional fellowship. These additional fellowships ranged from surgical retina (12/25, 48%), cornea (8/25, 32%), and medical retina (4/25, 16%). Two-thirds of uveitis specialists managed their own immunosuppression, while one-third comanaged immunosuppression with rheumatologists. Thirty-three of 48 (69%) maintained a surgical practice. <b>Conclusion</b>  This is the first survey of uveitis specialists across the United States to provide understanding into training and practice characteristics. These data will provide insight into career planning, practice building, and assist in resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"14 2","pages":"e187-e192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/79/10-1055-s-0042-1755581.PMC9928062.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose  This study characterizes the current landscape of uveitis specialists and their practice settings in the United States. Methods  An anonymous Internet-based survey with questions pertaining to training history and practice characteristics was distributed via REDCap to the American Uveitis Society and Young Uveitis Specialists listservs. Results  Forty-eight uveitis specialists in the United States responded to the survey out of 174 uveitis specialists that identify as practicing in the United States. Twenty-five of 48 respondents (52%) completed an additional fellowship. These additional fellowships ranged from surgical retina (12/25, 48%), cornea (8/25, 32%), and medical retina (4/25, 16%). Two-thirds of uveitis specialists managed their own immunosuppression, while one-third comanaged immunosuppression with rheumatologists. Thirty-three of 48 (69%) maintained a surgical practice. Conclusion  This is the first survey of uveitis specialists across the United States to provide understanding into training and practice characteristics. These data will provide insight into career planning, practice building, and assist in resource allocation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国葡萄膜炎专家的现状。
目的:本研究描述了美国葡萄膜炎专科医生的现状和他们的实践环境。方法通过REDCap向美国葡萄膜炎协会和青年葡萄膜炎专家列表服务器发送匿名网络调查问卷,问卷内容包括培训历史和实践特征。结果在174名在美国执业的葡萄膜炎专家中,48名美国葡萄膜炎专家对调查做出了回应。48名受访者中有25人(52%)完成了额外的奖学金。这些额外的奖学金包括手术视网膜(12/25,48%)、角膜(8/25,32%)和医学视网膜(4/25,16%)。三分之二的葡萄膜炎专家自行控制免疫抑制,而三分之一的风湿病专家控制免疫抑制。48人中有33人(69%)坚持手术治疗。结论:这是对美国葡萄膜炎专家进行的第一次调查,旨在了解其培训和实践特点。这些数据将为职业规划、实践建设提供见解,并协助资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1