Development and Implementation of a Clinician-Educator Track for Residents in Anesthesiology.

Julia B Sobol, May Hua, Teeda Pinyavat, Cortessa L Russell, Allison J Lee, Maya J Hastie
{"title":"Development and Implementation of a Clinician-Educator Track for Residents in Anesthesiology.","authors":"Julia B Sobol,&nbsp;May Hua,&nbsp;Teeda Pinyavat,&nbsp;Cortessa L Russell,&nbsp;Allison J Lee,&nbsp;Maya J Hastie","doi":"10.46374/volxxv_issue2_Sobol","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinician-educators in academic settings have often had no formal training in teaching or in giving feedback to trainees. We implemented a Clinician-Educator Track within the Department of Anesthesiology with the initial goal of improving teaching skills through a didactic curriculum and experiential opportunities for a broad audience of faculty, fellows, and residents. We then assessed our program for feasibility and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a 1-year curriculum focusing on adult learning theory, evidence-based best teaching practices in different educational settings, and giving feedback. We recorded the number of participants and their attendance at monthly sessions. The year culminated in a voluntary observed teaching session using an objective assessment rubric to structure feedback. Participants in the Clinician-Educator Track then evaluated the program through anonymous online surveys. Qualitative content analysis of the survey comments was performed using inductive coding to generate relevant categories and identify the main themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 19 participants in the first year of the program and 16 in the second year. Attendance at most sessions remained high. Participants appreciated the flexibility and design of scheduled sessions. They very much enjoyed the voluntary observed teaching sessions to practice what they had learned throughout the year. All participants were satisfied with the Clinician-Educator Track, and many participants described changes and improvements in their teaching practices due to the course.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a novel, anesthesiology-specific Clinician-Educator Track has been feasible and successful, with participants reporting improved teaching skills and overall satisfaction with the program.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"25 2","pages":"E704"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291953/pdf/i2333-0406-25-2-Sobol.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxv_issue2_Sobol","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinician-educators in academic settings have often had no formal training in teaching or in giving feedback to trainees. We implemented a Clinician-Educator Track within the Department of Anesthesiology with the initial goal of improving teaching skills through a didactic curriculum and experiential opportunities for a broad audience of faculty, fellows, and residents. We then assessed our program for feasibility and effectiveness.

Methods: We developed a 1-year curriculum focusing on adult learning theory, evidence-based best teaching practices in different educational settings, and giving feedback. We recorded the number of participants and their attendance at monthly sessions. The year culminated in a voluntary observed teaching session using an objective assessment rubric to structure feedback. Participants in the Clinician-Educator Track then evaluated the program through anonymous online surveys. Qualitative content analysis of the survey comments was performed using inductive coding to generate relevant categories and identify the main themes.

Results: There were 19 participants in the first year of the program and 16 in the second year. Attendance at most sessions remained high. Participants appreciated the flexibility and design of scheduled sessions. They very much enjoyed the voluntary observed teaching sessions to practice what they had learned throughout the year. All participants were satisfied with the Clinician-Educator Track, and many participants described changes and improvements in their teaching practices due to the course.

Conclusions: The implementation of a novel, anesthesiology-specific Clinician-Educator Track has been feasible and successful, with participants reporting improved teaching skills and overall satisfaction with the program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉学住院医师-教育工作者课程的发展与实施。
背景:学术环境中的临床教育工作者通常没有接受过正式的教学培训或向受训者提供反馈。我们在麻醉科实施了临床医生-教育者跟踪,最初的目标是通过教学课程和为广大教师、研究员和住院医师提供体验机会来提高教学技能。然后我们评估了我们的方案的可行性和有效性。方法:我们开发了一个为期一年的课程,重点是成人学习理论,在不同的教育环境中以证据为基础的最佳教学实践,并给出反馈。我们记录了参与者的数量和他们每月参加会议的人数。这一年的高潮是一次自愿观察教学会议,使用客观评估标准来组织反馈。然后,临床医生-教育者跟踪项目的参与者通过匿名在线调查对该项目进行评估。使用归纳编码对调查评论进行定性内容分析,以生成相关类别并确定主要主题。结果:项目第一年有19名参与者,第二年有16名参与者。大多数会议的出席率仍然很高。与会者赞赏会议安排的灵活性和设计。他们非常喜欢自愿观察教学课程,以实践他们在一年中所学到的知识。所有的参与者都对临床医生-教育者课程感到满意,许多参与者描述了他们的教学实践因课程而发生的变化和改进。结论:实施一种新颖的,麻醉学特异性临床医生-教育者跟踪是可行和成功的,参与者报告教学技能和总体满意度的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographical Distribution of Newly Accredited Anesthesiology Training Programs in Relation to Health Professional Shortage Areas and Medically Underserved Populations. Identification of Candidate Characteristics that Predicted a Successful Anesthesiology Residency Program Match in 2024: An Anonymous, Prospective Survey. The Role of Ombuds in Graduate Medical Education: Fostering Wellness and Psychological Safety. Assessment and Recommendations for the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Fellowship Websites. Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1