Jiajie Jessica Xu, Phaedra B Hutchison, Nicole L Herndon, Sarah O Allison, Lyndon J Goodly
{"title":"Comparison of Low- and High-temperature Cagewash Cycles for Sanitation of Rodent Housing Equipment in Research Facilities.","authors":"Jiajie Jessica Xu, Phaedra B Hutchison, Nicole L Herndon, Sarah O Allison, Lyndon J Goodly","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sanitation guidelines for animal research facilities state that disinfection is achieved by application of high-temperature water (143 to 180 °F [62 to 82 °C]) or detergents and disinfectants. However, these guidelines are based on requirements for pasteurization, which may be unnecessarily stringent for the sanitation of nonfood items and do not address the theoretical sanitation potential of water at temperatures below 143 °F (62 °C). Recent literature indicates that water temperatures below 143 °F (62 °C) can also provide effective sanitation. In this study, we compared cagewash cycles at low (100 °F [38 °C] and 120 °F [49 °C]) and high (standard) (180 °F [82 °C]) temperatures and evaluated sanitation efficacy by using ATP swabs and RODAC plates. Low-temperature loads were washed either with or without prior treatment of a chemical disinfectant (10% bleach). The 100 °F (38 °C) cycle was not sufficient for sanitization without bleach pretreatment. However, the 120 °F (49 °C) cycle effectively sanitized cages without bleach pretreatment. Validation of effective sanitation at a lower water temperature (120 °F [49 °C]) can improve cagewash logistics and reduce costs as compared with standard (180 °F [82 °C]) high-temperature cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":"62 1","pages":"48-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936851/pdf/jaalas2023000048.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sanitation guidelines for animal research facilities state that disinfection is achieved by application of high-temperature water (143 to 180 °F [62 to 82 °C]) or detergents and disinfectants. However, these guidelines are based on requirements for pasteurization, which may be unnecessarily stringent for the sanitation of nonfood items and do not address the theoretical sanitation potential of water at temperatures below 143 °F (62 °C). Recent literature indicates that water temperatures below 143 °F (62 °C) can also provide effective sanitation. In this study, we compared cagewash cycles at low (100 °F [38 °C] and 120 °F [49 °C]) and high (standard) (180 °F [82 °C]) temperatures and evaluated sanitation efficacy by using ATP swabs and RODAC plates. Low-temperature loads were washed either with or without prior treatment of a chemical disinfectant (10% bleach). The 100 °F (38 °C) cycle was not sufficient for sanitization without bleach pretreatment. However, the 120 °F (49 °C) cycle effectively sanitized cages without bleach pretreatment. Validation of effective sanitation at a lower water temperature (120 °F [49 °C]) can improve cagewash logistics and reduce costs as compared with standard (180 °F [82 °C]) high-temperature cycles.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (JAALAS) serves as an official communication vehicle for the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS). The journal includes a section of refereed articles and a section of AALAS association news.
All signed articles, including refereed articles and book reviews, editorials, committee reports, and news and commentary, reflect the individual views of the authors and are not official views of AALAS. The mission of the refereed section of the journal is to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed information on animal biology, technology, facility operations, management, and compliance as relevant to the AALAS membership. JAALAS accepts research reports (data-based) or scholarly reports (literature-based), with the caveat that all articles, including solicited manuscripts, must include appropriate references and must undergo peer review.