Evaluation of cognitive disengagement syndrome in children with obsessive-compulsive disorder: Clinical implications.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-18 DOI:10.1177/13591045231169137
Ayla Uzun Cicek, Ilknur Ucuz, Cansu Mercan Isık, Gürkan Temelli
{"title":"Evaluation of cognitive disengagement syndrome in children with obsessive-compulsive disorder: Clinical implications.","authors":"Ayla Uzun Cicek,&nbsp;Ilknur Ucuz,&nbsp;Cansu Mercan Isık,&nbsp;Gürkan Temelli","doi":"10.1177/13591045231169137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) has been found to be associated with internalizing symptoms. Yet, no study thus far has focused on whether there is an association between obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and CDS. The purpose of this study is to examine the symptom frequency and clinical implications of CDS in children with OCD. The study included sixty-one children with OCD and sixty-six typically developing children. Children were evaluated by a semi-constructed diagnosis interview, Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory, Barkley Child Attention Scale, and Stroop test. The frequency of elevated symptoms of CDS, and total time, total error, and total correction scores of the Stroop test were significantly higher in the OCD group compared to the controls. Elevated CDS symptoms were significantly associated with higher OCD symptom prevalence and poorer performance on the Stroop Test. Moreover, poor insight, hoarding symptoms, mental compulsions, and ADHD comorbidity were significantly higher in those with elevated CDS symptoms than in those without CDS in the OCD group. The findings of this study provide clinical implications that CDS symptoms may contribute to deficits in attentional orientation, conceptual flexibility, and cognitive processing speed in OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48840,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1449-1462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045231169137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) has been found to be associated with internalizing symptoms. Yet, no study thus far has focused on whether there is an association between obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and CDS. The purpose of this study is to examine the symptom frequency and clinical implications of CDS in children with OCD. The study included sixty-one children with OCD and sixty-six typically developing children. Children were evaluated by a semi-constructed diagnosis interview, Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory, Barkley Child Attention Scale, and Stroop test. The frequency of elevated symptoms of CDS, and total time, total error, and total correction scores of the Stroop test were significantly higher in the OCD group compared to the controls. Elevated CDS symptoms were significantly associated with higher OCD symptom prevalence and poorer performance on the Stroop Test. Moreover, poor insight, hoarding symptoms, mental compulsions, and ADHD comorbidity were significantly higher in those with elevated CDS symptoms than in those without CDS in the OCD group. The findings of this study provide clinical implications that CDS symptoms may contribute to deficits in attentional orientation, conceptual flexibility, and cognitive processing speed in OCD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强迫症儿童认知脱离综合征的评估:临床意义。
认知脱离综合征(CDS)已被发现与内化症状有关。然而,到目前为止,还没有研究关注强迫症(OCD)和CDS之间是否存在关联。本研究的目的是检查儿童强迫症的症状频率和CDS的临床意义。这项研究包括61名强迫症儿童和66名典型发育中的儿童。采用半结构诊断访谈、强迫量表、巴克利儿童注意力量表和Stroop测试对儿童进行评估。与对照组相比,强迫症组CDS症状升高的频率、Stroop测试的总时间、总错误和总纠正分数显著较高。CDS症状升高与强迫症症状患病率较高和Stroop测试表现较差显著相关。此外,在强迫症组中,CDS症状升高的患者的洞察力差、囤积症状、精神强迫和多动症合并症显著高于没有CDS的患者。这项研究的结果提供了临床意义,即CDS症状可能导致强迫症患者注意力定向、概念灵活性和认知处理速度的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
130
期刊介绍: Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry brings together clinically oriented, peer reviewed work of the highest distinction from an international and multidisciplinary perspective, offering comprehensive coverage of clinical and treatment issues across the range of treatment modalities. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry is interested in advancing theory, practice and clinical research in the realm of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry and related disciplines. The journal directs its attention to matters of clinical practice, including related topics such as the ethics of treatment and the integration of research into practice. Multidisciplinary in approach, the journal includes work by, and is of interest to, child psychologists, psychiatrists and psychotherapists, nurses, social workers and all other professionals in the fields of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Exploring psychosocial factors in the functional recovery of children with severe mental disorders: A qualitative content analysis A hospital and community-based violence intervention program for Black & Latino youth and their caregivers Stakeholder perspectives on managing the adolescent sleep crisis using a transdiagnostic self-management app for sleep disturbances: A qualitative follow-up study Family members' experiences of seeking help for a young person with symptoms associated with the psychosis spectrum: A narrative review and synthesis. Exploring social stages of play through eye to I© intervention model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1