Unipolar Latissimus Dorsi Transfer for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Residual Post-traumatic Brachial Plexus Palsy Associated with Distal Humeral Fractures.

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2021-12-01 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1739962
Ahmed Fathy Sadek, Mohamed A Ellabban
{"title":"Unipolar Latissimus Dorsi Transfer for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Residual Post-traumatic Brachial Plexus Palsy Associated with Distal Humeral Fractures.","authors":"Ahmed Fathy Sadek, Mohamed A Ellabban","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1739962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Elbow flexion is indispensable for both functioning and nonfunctioning hands. It is well perceived that restoration of elbow function is the first reconstructive priority in cases of brachial plexus injuries. The authors assessed the impact of associated distal humeral fractures on the functional outcome after unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer (ULDT) for restoration of elbow flexion in patients with residual brachial plexus palsy (BPP). <b>Patients and Methods</b>  Twenty-three patients operated for restoring elbow flexion after residual post-traumatic BPP (with or without distal humeral fracture) by unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer (ULDT) were reviewed for a retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups; associated distal humeral fracture group (HF-group; 10 patients) and non-associated distal humeral fracture group (NHF-group; 13 patients). Elbow flexion active range of motion (AROM), flexion deformity in addition to Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were assessed. <b>Results</b>  In both groups there were statistically better postoperative MEPS grading ( <i>p</i>  = 0.007, <i>p</i>  = 0.001 <i>,</i> respectively) and scoring with a mean of 81 ± 16.1 and 90 ± 4.6, respectively ( <i>p <</i> 0.001). The mean postoperative elbow flexion AROM was statistically better in both groups. The mean supination AROM was better in NHF group ( <i>p</i>  = 0.057). <b>Conclusion</b>  The use of ULDT in residual post-traumatic BPP is an efficient procedure in regaining functional flexion and supination. An associated distal humeral fracture does not significantly affect the final functional outcome. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"15 3","pages":"203-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10306985/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1739962.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Elbow flexion is indispensable for both functioning and nonfunctioning hands. It is well perceived that restoration of elbow function is the first reconstructive priority in cases of brachial plexus injuries. The authors assessed the impact of associated distal humeral fractures on the functional outcome after unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer (ULDT) for restoration of elbow flexion in patients with residual brachial plexus palsy (BPP). Patients and Methods  Twenty-three patients operated for restoring elbow flexion after residual post-traumatic BPP (with or without distal humeral fracture) by unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer (ULDT) were reviewed for a retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups; associated distal humeral fracture group (HF-group; 10 patients) and non-associated distal humeral fracture group (NHF-group; 13 patients). Elbow flexion active range of motion (AROM), flexion deformity in addition to Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were assessed. Results  In both groups there were statistically better postoperative MEPS grading ( p  = 0.007, p  = 0.001 , respectively) and scoring with a mean of 81 ± 16.1 and 90 ± 4.6, respectively ( p < 0.001). The mean postoperative elbow flexion AROM was statistically better in both groups. The mean supination AROM was better in NHF group ( p  = 0.057). Conclusion  The use of ULDT in residual post-traumatic BPP is an efficient procedure in regaining functional flexion and supination. An associated distal humeral fracture does not significantly affect the final functional outcome. Level of Evidence  Level IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单极背阔肌转移术用于恢复肱骨远端骨折引起的创伤后残余臂丛神经麻痹患者的肘关节屈曲功能。
导言 肘关节的屈曲对于有功能和无功能的手都是不可或缺的。在臂丛神经损伤病例中,恢复肘关节功能是重建的首要任务。作者评估了伴发的肱骨远端骨折对残余臂丛神经麻痹(BPP)患者进行单极背阔肌转移术(ULDT)以恢复肘关节屈曲功能的影响。患者和方法 对 23 名创伤后残余臂丛神经麻痹(伴有或不伴有肱骨远端骨折)患者通过单极背阔肌转移术(ULDT)恢复肘关节屈曲的手术进行回顾性研究。患者分为两组:伴有肱骨远端骨折组(HF 组,10 名患者)和非伴有肱骨远端骨折组(NHF 组,13 名患者)。对肘关节屈曲主动活动范围(AROM)、屈曲畸形以及梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)进行评估。结果 两组患者术后 MEPS 分级(分别为 p = 0.007 和 p = 0.001)和评分(分别为平均值 81 ± 16.1 和 90 ± 4.6)均有显著改善(p 0.001)。从统计学角度看,两组患者术后肘关节屈曲AROM的平均值都更好。NHF组的平均上举AROM更好(P = 0.057)。结论 在创伤后残余 BPP 中使用 ULDT 是恢复屈曲和上举功能的有效方法。伴发的肱骨远端骨折对最终功能结果无明显影响。证据等级 IV 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The modified placenta model for microsurgery training: Recommended methods for comprehensive microsurgery experience. Ulnar shaft diameter as it relates to plate osteosynthesis: A cadaveric study. A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the readability and quality of online resources regarding thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery. Diagnostic and management strategies for pseudoaneurysm of the ulnar artery: A scoping review. Predictors of leech therapy failure in revascularized and replanted digits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1