Achilles tenotomy during Ponseti's clubfoot treatment: better early than late.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1097/BPB.0000000000001106
Ismat Ghanem, Diane Ghanem, Joe Rassi, Ibrahim Saliba
{"title":"Achilles tenotomy during Ponseti's clubfoot treatment: better early than late.","authors":"Ismat Ghanem, Diane Ghanem, Joe Rassi, Ibrahim Saliba","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the outcome of Achilles tenotomy at first cast in neonates with stiff clubfoot undergoing Ponseti's method of treatment. One hundred forty stiff clubfeet (Dimeglio grades III and IV) scheduled for Ponseti's method were prospectively randomized into two groups of 70 each: (1) early, tenotomy at first cast; (2) late, tenotomy at fourth to sixth casts (conventional). The procedure was performed under local lidocaine spray in an office setting using a needle. The results were assessed at an average follow-up of 12.4 years. Technical difficulties and short and long-term complications were recorded. At last follow-up, the results were rated excellent, good, fair, and poor in 70, 18, 9, and 3% of patients in the late group, respectively, and 82, 13, 4, and 1% in the early group ( P  = 0.048). Technical difficulties were encountered in 38% of the late group and 3% in the early group ( P  < 0.0001). Flattening of the talar dome of mild to moderate severity was found in 16% of the late group and 4% in the early group ( P  < 0.001). Early Achilles tenotomy seems to give better results than the conventional late tenotomy, with less short and long-term complications. This may be explained by the greater ease to palpate the Achilles tendon on a previously untreated foot, and the less amount of compressive forces across the tibiotalar and subtalar joints produced by early release of the posterior tether.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":"251-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the outcome of Achilles tenotomy at first cast in neonates with stiff clubfoot undergoing Ponseti's method of treatment. One hundred forty stiff clubfeet (Dimeglio grades III and IV) scheduled for Ponseti's method were prospectively randomized into two groups of 70 each: (1) early, tenotomy at first cast; (2) late, tenotomy at fourth to sixth casts (conventional). The procedure was performed under local lidocaine spray in an office setting using a needle. The results were assessed at an average follow-up of 12.4 years. Technical difficulties and short and long-term complications were recorded. At last follow-up, the results were rated excellent, good, fair, and poor in 70, 18, 9, and 3% of patients in the late group, respectively, and 82, 13, 4, and 1% in the early group ( P  = 0.048). Technical difficulties were encountered in 38% of the late group and 3% in the early group ( P  < 0.0001). Flattening of the talar dome of mild to moderate severity was found in 16% of the late group and 4% in the early group ( P  < 0.001). Early Achilles tenotomy seems to give better results than the conventional late tenotomy, with less short and long-term complications. This may be explained by the greater ease to palpate the Achilles tendon on a previously untreated foot, and the less amount of compressive forces across the tibiotalar and subtalar joints produced by early release of the posterior tether.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
庞塞蒂足癣治疗中的跟腱切开术:早做比晚做更好。
目的:评估对患有僵硬型马蹄内翻足的新生儿采用 Ponseti 治疗法进行第一次石膏跟腱切开术的效果。前瞻性地将140名计划接受庞塞蒂疗法治疗的僵硬型足外翻(Dimeglio III级和IV级)新生儿随机分为两组,每组70人:(1)早期组,在第一次石膏固定时进行跟腱切开术;(2)晚期组,在第四次至第六次石膏固定时进行跟腱切开术(常规)。手术在局部利多卡因喷雾下进行,使用针头在办公室环境中进行。结果在平均 12.4 年的随访中进行了评估。技术难度、短期和长期并发症均被记录在案。在最后一次随访中,晚期组分别有70%、18%、9%和3%的患者获得了优、良、一般和差的结果,早期组分别有82%、13%、4%和1%的患者获得了优、良、一般和差的结果(P = 0.048)。晚期组中有 38% 的患者遇到了技术困难,早期组中有 3% 的患者遇到了技术困难(P=0.048)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
期刊最新文献
Bending osteotomy through the distal tibial physis for stable reduction of the ankle joint in fibular hemimelia. Update at skeletal maturity. Casting, elastic intramedullary nailing or external fixation in pediatric tibial shaft fractures: which is the most appropriate treatment? A multicenter study. Low osteotomy cut of Dega procedure for older children with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Safety and effectiveness of halo gravity traction combined with traditional growing rods in severe early-onset scoliosis with neurofibromatosis type 1. The effects of gastrojejunostomy tube placement on pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications following spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1