Comparison of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury during Thyroidectomy with and Without Routine Identification of the Nerve Peroperatively.

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2023-07-01
S Mohammed, M A Ullah, P D Saha, M A Rahman, G M Shawon, M I Siddique, A S Khan
{"title":"Comparison of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury during Thyroidectomy with and Without Routine Identification of the Nerve Peroperatively.","authors":"S Mohammed,&nbsp;M A Ullah,&nbsp;P D Saha,&nbsp;M A Rahman,&nbsp;G M Shawon,&nbsp;M I Siddique,&nbsp;A S Khan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thyroidectomy is one of the commonest operative procedures performed in the neck and injury to recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is not uncommon. It results in hoarseness to serious respiratory distress depending on the extent of the injury. The incidence of RLN injury varies widely and is multifactorial depending on the extent of surgical procedures, experience and expertise of the surgeons, nature of the thyroid diseases and a wide range of anatomical variations. Peroperative routine identification of the nerve during thyroidectomy can be a way to prevent injury. Despite recommendation for identification of the RLN peroperatively in thyroid surgery, a debate still exists whether the nerve to be identified peroperatively or not, to avoid its inadvertent injury. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of RLN injury between two groups where RLN was identified peroperatively in one group and the nerve was not attempted for identification in the other group in thyroid surgery. A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out in the department of surgery and otolaryngology at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from June 2018 to November 2019, on patients who underwent elective thyroid surgery. Patients were included in RLN identified group and in RLN not identified group, by individual surgeons' preference to identify or not to identify the RLN peroperatively. Peroperative identification of the nerve was done by direct visualization. All cases were evaluated for vocal cord palsy preoperatively, during extubation and postoperatively. Patient's particulars, other parameters and perioperative data were recorded. A total of 80 cases were included in this study, 40 cases (50.0%) in the peroperative RLN identified group and 40 cases (50.0%) in the RLN not identified group. Unilateral RLN palsy was encountered in 2.5% (2 cases) in the RLN identified group and 6.3% (5 cases) in the nerve not identified group (p value 0.192). Transient unilateral RLN palsy was seen in 7.5% (6 cases) of patients; 2.5% (2 cases) in the RLN identified group and 5.0% (4 cases) in the RLN not identified group. And 1.3% (1 case) of permanent unilateral RLN palsy was encountered in this study, which was in the RLN not identified group; there was no permanent palsy in the RLN identified group. We did not encounter any bilateral RLN palsy. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of RLN injury between the peroperatively RLN identified group and no attempt to identify the nerve group despite recommendation for peroperative RLN identification in thyroid surgery to avoid its inadvertent injury. However, from this study, we recommend peroperative RLN identification in thyroid surgery to enhance surgical skill.</p>","PeriodicalId":18959,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":"32 3","pages":"690-698"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thyroidectomy is one of the commonest operative procedures performed in the neck and injury to recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is not uncommon. It results in hoarseness to serious respiratory distress depending on the extent of the injury. The incidence of RLN injury varies widely and is multifactorial depending on the extent of surgical procedures, experience and expertise of the surgeons, nature of the thyroid diseases and a wide range of anatomical variations. Peroperative routine identification of the nerve during thyroidectomy can be a way to prevent injury. Despite recommendation for identification of the RLN peroperatively in thyroid surgery, a debate still exists whether the nerve to be identified peroperatively or not, to avoid its inadvertent injury. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of RLN injury between two groups where RLN was identified peroperatively in one group and the nerve was not attempted for identification in the other group in thyroid surgery. A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out in the department of surgery and otolaryngology at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from June 2018 to November 2019, on patients who underwent elective thyroid surgery. Patients were included in RLN identified group and in RLN not identified group, by individual surgeons' preference to identify or not to identify the RLN peroperatively. Peroperative identification of the nerve was done by direct visualization. All cases were evaluated for vocal cord palsy preoperatively, during extubation and postoperatively. Patient's particulars, other parameters and perioperative data were recorded. A total of 80 cases were included in this study, 40 cases (50.0%) in the peroperative RLN identified group and 40 cases (50.0%) in the RLN not identified group. Unilateral RLN palsy was encountered in 2.5% (2 cases) in the RLN identified group and 6.3% (5 cases) in the nerve not identified group (p value 0.192). Transient unilateral RLN palsy was seen in 7.5% (6 cases) of patients; 2.5% (2 cases) in the RLN identified group and 5.0% (4 cases) in the RLN not identified group. And 1.3% (1 case) of permanent unilateral RLN palsy was encountered in this study, which was in the RLN not identified group; there was no permanent palsy in the RLN identified group. We did not encounter any bilateral RLN palsy. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of RLN injury between the peroperatively RLN identified group and no attempt to identify the nerve group despite recommendation for peroperative RLN identification in thyroid surgery to avoid its inadvertent injury. However, from this study, we recommend peroperative RLN identification in thyroid surgery to enhance surgical skill.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺切除术中喉返神经损伤的比较。
甲状腺切除术是颈部最常见的手术之一,喉返神经(RLN)损伤并不罕见。它会导致声音嘶哑到严重的呼吸窘迫,这取决于受伤的程度。RLN损伤的发生率差异很大,并且是多因素的,这取决于外科手术的程度、外科医生的经验和专业知识、甲状腺疾病的性质和广泛的解剖变异。术中常规识别甲状腺神经是预防损伤的一种方法。尽管推荐在甲状腺手术中通过手术识别RLN,但是否需要通过手术识别该神经以避免其意外损伤仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较两组之间的RLN损伤发生率,其中一组在手术中确定了RLN,而另一组在甲状腺手术中没有尝试识别神经。2018年6月至2019年11月,在孟加拉国达卡的Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学(BSMMU)外科和耳鼻喉科对接受选择性甲状腺手术的患者进行了一项比较横断面研究。根据个别外科医生对手术中识别或不识别RLN的偏好,将患者分为识别RLN组和未识别RLN组。术中神经的识别采用目视法。所有病例术前、拔管期间及术后均进行声带麻痹评估。记录患者的详细情况、其他参数及围手术期资料。本研究共纳入80例,术中发现RLN组40例(50.0%),未发现RLN组40例(50.0%)。单侧RLN麻痹发生率在RLN识别组为2.5%(2例),未识别神经组为6.3%(5例)(p值0.192)。短暂性单侧RLN麻痹发生率为7.5%(6例);RLN确诊组2.5%(2例),RLN未确诊组5.0%(4例)。本研究中有1.3%(1例)的永久性单侧RLN瘫痪,属于RLN未识别组;在确定的RLN组中没有永久性瘫痪。我们没有遇到任何双侧RLN麻痹。尽管建议在甲状腺手术中术中识别RLN以避免其无意损伤,但术中识别RLN组与未尝试识别神经组之间RLN损伤发生率无统计学差异。然而,从本研究中,我们建议在甲状腺手术中识别RLN以提高手术技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Clinical Profile, Severity and Outcome of Community Acquired Pneumonia with Hyponatremia in Children Aged 2-60 Months. Status of Serum Calcium and Magnesium in Hospital Admitted Chronic Kidney Disease Patients in Mymensingh Locality of Bangladesh. Relation of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio with Clinical Severity in Patients with Guillain-Barre Syndrome. Species Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern of Candida Isolates in Patients with Vulvovaginitis from Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Antibacterial Effects of Chloroform Henna (Lawsonia inermis) Leaf Extracts against Two Nosocomial Infection Causing Pathogens: Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Comparative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1