Suggestions for overcoming the barriers to critical thinking in nursing

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Japan Journal of Nursing Science Pub Date : 2023-02-08 DOI:10.1111/jjns.12525
Antonios Christodoulakis, Michael Zografakis Sfakianakis, Ioanna Tsiligianni
{"title":"Suggestions for overcoming the barriers to critical thinking in nursing","authors":"Antonios Christodoulakis,&nbsp;Michael Zografakis Sfakianakis,&nbsp;Ioanna Tsiligianni","doi":"10.1111/jjns.12525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nurses strive to provide the best quality of care to their patients in a stressful and constantly changing environment. Critical thinking (CT) could help nurses provide better quality of care to their patients. However, studies have shown that nurses either have low levels of CT or underutilize it during clinical practice. A possible explanation could be that nurses experience barriers during the development and/or utilization of CT. Since CT can be cultivated during university, nurse educators could utilize methods that improve CT. However, nurse educators do not sufficiently develop the CT of their students, since they usually rely on teacher-centered methods and not active learning methods. On the other hand, during clinical practice nurses cope with several barriers that inhibit their ability to use CT, such as: lack of teamwork, high levels of stress, time constraints, and understaffing. All these barriers decrease the utilization of CT and the quality of care that nurses provide. The present commentary suggests a simple strategy that could be used by educators and assist graduate nurses overcome the barriers to utilize CT during clinical practice. This strategy consists of three distinct components, namely: individual, interdisciplinary, and administrative. Each component could be used individually to improve the CT of nurses depending on the available resources and facilities. Nevertheless, educators by improving the CT of nurses could assist them in providing better quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50265,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jjns.12525","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jjns.12525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Nurses strive to provide the best quality of care to their patients in a stressful and constantly changing environment. Critical thinking (CT) could help nurses provide better quality of care to their patients. However, studies have shown that nurses either have low levels of CT or underutilize it during clinical practice. A possible explanation could be that nurses experience barriers during the development and/or utilization of CT. Since CT can be cultivated during university, nurse educators could utilize methods that improve CT. However, nurse educators do not sufficiently develop the CT of their students, since they usually rely on teacher-centered methods and not active learning methods. On the other hand, during clinical practice nurses cope with several barriers that inhibit their ability to use CT, such as: lack of teamwork, high levels of stress, time constraints, and understaffing. All these barriers decrease the utilization of CT and the quality of care that nurses provide. The present commentary suggests a simple strategy that could be used by educators and assist graduate nurses overcome the barriers to utilize CT during clinical practice. This strategy consists of three distinct components, namely: individual, interdisciplinary, and administrative. Each component could be used individually to improve the CT of nurses depending on the available resources and facilities. Nevertheless, educators by improving the CT of nurses could assist them in providing better quality of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克服护理中批判性思维障碍的建议
护士努力在充满压力和不断变化的环境中为病人提供最优质的护理。批判性思维(CT)可以帮助护士为病人提供更好的护理质量。然而,研究表明,护士在临床实践中要么CT水平低,要么利用不足。一种可能的解释是护士在CT的开发和/或使用过程中遇到了障碍。由于CT可以在大学期间培养,护理教育者可以采用提高CT的方法。然而,护理教育工作者并没有充分发展他们的学生的CT,因为他们通常依赖于以教师为中心的方法,而不是主动学习的方法。另一方面,在临床实践中,护士应对一些阻碍他们使用CT能力的障碍,例如:缺乏团队合作,高水平的压力,时间限制和人手不足。所有这些障碍都降低了CT的使用和护士提供的护理质量。目前的评论建议一个简单的策略,可用于教育工作者和协助研究生护士克服障碍,利用CT在临床实践。这一战略由三个不同的组成部分组成,即:个人、跨学科和行政。每个组成部分可以单独使用,以提高护士的CT取决于现有的资源和设施。然而,教育工作者通过提高护士的CT可以帮助他们提供更好的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japan Journal of Nursing Science is the official English language journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Science. The purpose of the Journal is to provide a mechanism to share knowledge related to improving health care and promoting the development of nursing. The Journal seeks original manuscripts reporting scholarly work on the art and science of nursing. Original articles may be empirical and qualitative studies, review articles, methodological articles, brief reports, case studies and letters to the Editor. Please see Instructions for Authors for detailed authorship qualification requirement.
期刊最新文献
Rural women's voices revealing perceptions about decisions on where to give birth in Gabon: A qualitative study Association of psychosocial factors at work with fertility and menstrual disorders: A systematic review Evaluation of the performance of nursing students taught using online and offline learning models in emergency and critical care nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic The role of family support in medication adherence and quality of life among tuberculosis patients: A scoping review Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1