Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: Updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Open Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100063
Don Husereau , Michael Drummond , Federico Augustovski , Esther de Bekker-Grob , Andrew H Briggs , Chris Carswell , Lisa Caulley , Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk , Dan Greenberg , Elizabeth Loder , Josephine Mauskopf , C Daniel Mullins , Stavros Petrou , Raoh-Fang Pwu , Sophie Staniszewska , on behalf of CHEERS 2022 ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force
{"title":"Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: Updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations","authors":"Don Husereau ,&nbsp;Michael Drummond ,&nbsp;Federico Augustovski ,&nbsp;Esther de Bekker-Grob ,&nbsp;Andrew H Briggs ,&nbsp;Chris Carswell ,&nbsp;Lisa Caulley ,&nbsp;Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk ,&nbsp;Dan Greenberg ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Loder ,&nbsp;Josephine Mauskopf ,&nbsp;C Daniel Mullins ,&nbsp;Stavros Petrou ,&nbsp;Raoh-Fang Pwu ,&nbsp;Sophie Staniszewska ,&nbsp;on behalf of CHEERS 2022 ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer reviewed journals as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100063"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229621000344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer reviewed journals as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合卫生经济评价报告标准2022(干杯2022)声明:更新的卫生经济评价报告指南
卫生经济评价是在费用和后果方面对备选行动方案进行比较分析。2013年发布的综合卫生经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明旨在确保卫生经济评估可识别、可解释并对决策有用。它的目的是作为指导,帮助作者准确地报告哪些健康干预措施正在进行比较,在什么背景下,如何进行评估,结果是什么,以及其他可能有助于读者和评论者解释和使用研究的细节。新的干杯2022声明取代了以前的干杯报告指南。它反映出需要更容易适用于所有类型的卫生经济评价的指导、该领域的新方法和发展,以及包括患者和公众在内的利益攸关方参与的更大作用。它也广泛适用于旨在改善个人或人口健康的任何形式的干预,无论是简单的还是复杂的,而不考虑具体情况(如卫生保健、公共卫生、教育、社会保健等)。这篇摘要文章介绍了新的干杯2022 28项清单以及对每个项目的建议。干杯2022声明主要用于报告同行评议期刊的经济评估的研究人员以及评估其发表的同行评议人和编辑。然而,我们预计熟悉报告需求将有助于分析人员在规划研究时。它也可能对寻求报告指导的卫生技术评估机构有用,因为越来越强调决策的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
The cost of the reemergence of monkeypox: An overview of health financing in Africa Closing the equity gap: A call for policy and programmatic reforms to ensure inclusive and effective HIV prevention, treatment and care for persons with disabilities in Eastern and Southern Africa Patient’s willingness to pay for improved community health insurance in Tanzania Improving antibiotic prescribing – Recommendations for funding and pricing policies to enhance use of point-of-care tests From theory to practice: Harmonizing taxonomies of trustworthy AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1