Evaluation of the Content of Ophthalmology Fellowship Program Web sites.

Peter Alsaloum, Matthew Alsaloum, Tyler J Kim, David X Zheng, Carolina C S Valentim, Justin C Muste, Jeffrey M Goshe, Rishi P Singh
{"title":"Evaluation of the Content of Ophthalmology Fellowship Program Web sites.","authors":"Peter Alsaloum,&nbsp;Matthew Alsaloum,&nbsp;Tyler J Kim,&nbsp;David X Zheng,&nbsp;Carolina C S Valentim,&nbsp;Justin C Muste,&nbsp;Jeffrey M Goshe,&nbsp;Rishi P Singh","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1747673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  To assess the availability and content of fellowship program Web sites (FPWs) among ophthalmology subspecialties. <b>Design</b>  This is a cross-sectional study. <b>Subjects</b>  Web sites of all Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology-accredited fellowship programs in five subspecialties (i.e., surgical retina and vitreous; cornea, external disease, and refractive surgery; glaucoma; neuro-ophthalmology; and pediatric ophthalmology). <b>Methods</b>  FPWs were assessed for the presence of 26 key content criteria encompassing program demographics ( <i>n</i>  = 13), features ( <i>n</i>  = 10), and social life ( <i>n</i>  = 3). The presence of each content criterion as well as the content criteria groups were compared across subspecialties. <b>Main Outcome Measures</b>  The main outcome measured is the average percentage of key content criteria present among ophthalmology fellowship Web sites. <b>Results</b>  Among 266 accredited fellowship programs, 240 (90.2%) had Web sites. On average, Web sites reported 14.9 of 26 key content criteria (57.2%), 8.29 of 13 demographic criteria (63.8%), 5.84 of the 10 program features criteria (58.4%), and 0.705 of the 3 social life criteria (23.5%). Significant differences were identified among subspecialties in the presence of program description ( <i>p</i>  = 0.046), hospital affiliation ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001), names of current fellows ( <i>p</i>  = 0.004), case diversity ( <i>p</i>  = 0.001), and surgical statistics ( <i>p</i>  = 0.015). The average number of key criteria differed between subspecialties ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b>  There is significant heterogeneity in program fellowship Web site content among ophthalmology subspecialties. Information regarding social life, such as wellness programs and community information, was largely absent across all disciplines. Addressing missing information on ophthalmology FPWs may help optimize program-applicant fit.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"14 1","pages":"e127-e132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0a/84/10-1055-s-0042-1747673.PMC9928003.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1747673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose  To assess the availability and content of fellowship program Web sites (FPWs) among ophthalmology subspecialties. Design  This is a cross-sectional study. Subjects  Web sites of all Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology-accredited fellowship programs in five subspecialties (i.e., surgical retina and vitreous; cornea, external disease, and refractive surgery; glaucoma; neuro-ophthalmology; and pediatric ophthalmology). Methods  FPWs were assessed for the presence of 26 key content criteria encompassing program demographics ( n  = 13), features ( n  = 10), and social life ( n  = 3). The presence of each content criterion as well as the content criteria groups were compared across subspecialties. Main Outcome Measures  The main outcome measured is the average percentage of key content criteria present among ophthalmology fellowship Web sites. Results  Among 266 accredited fellowship programs, 240 (90.2%) had Web sites. On average, Web sites reported 14.9 of 26 key content criteria (57.2%), 8.29 of 13 demographic criteria (63.8%), 5.84 of the 10 program features criteria (58.4%), and 0.705 of the 3 social life criteria (23.5%). Significant differences were identified among subspecialties in the presence of program description ( p  = 0.046), hospital affiliation ( p  < 0.001), names of current fellows ( p  = 0.004), case diversity ( p  = 0.001), and surgical statistics ( p  = 0.015). The average number of key criteria differed between subspecialties ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion  There is significant heterogeneity in program fellowship Web site content among ophthalmology subspecialties. Information regarding social life, such as wellness programs and community information, was largely absent across all disciplines. Addressing missing information on ophthalmology FPWs may help optimize program-applicant fit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估眼科奖学金计划网站的内容。
目的评估眼科亚专科奖学金项目网站(FPWs)的可用性和内容。这是一项横断面研究。所有眼科大学教授协会(Association of University Professors of ophthalmology)认可的五个亚专业(即视网膜外科和玻璃体外科;角膜、外部疾病和屈光手术;青光眼;neuro-ophthalmology;以及儿童眼科)。方法评估fpw是否存在26个关键内容标准,包括项目人口统计(n = 13)、特征(n = 10)和社会生活(n = 3)。每个内容标准的存在以及内容标准组在子专业之间进行比较。主要结果测量的主要结果是在眼科奖学金网站中主要内容标准的平均百分比。结果266个认证的奖学金项目中,240个(90.2%)有网站。在26个核心内容标准中,网站平均回答14.9个(57.2%)、13个人口统计标准中回答8.29个(63.8%)、10个节目特色标准中回答5.84个(58.4%)、3个社会生活标准中回答0.705个(23.5%)。亚专科在项目描述(p = 0.046)、医院归属(p = 0.004)、病例多样性(p = 0.001)和手术统计(p = 0.015)方面存在显著差异。结论眼科各专科项目奖学金网站内容存在显著的异质性。关于社会生活的信息,如健康项目和社区信息,在所有学科中都基本缺失。解决眼科fpw缺失的信息可能有助于优化项目申请人的契合度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1