Phenobarbital-Based Protocol for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in a Medical ICU: Pre-Post Implementation Study.

Mahmoud Alwakeel, Dina Alayan, Talha Saleem, Saira Afzal, Ellen Immler, Xiaofeng Wang, Bassel Akbik, Abhijit Duggal
{"title":"Phenobarbital-Based Protocol for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in a Medical ICU: Pre-Post Implementation Study.","authors":"Mahmoud Alwakeel,&nbsp;Dina Alayan,&nbsp;Talha Saleem,&nbsp;Saira Afzal,&nbsp;Ellen Immler,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Wang,&nbsp;Bassel Akbik,&nbsp;Abhijit Duggal","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: We assessed the efficacy and safety of PB compared with benzodiazepine (BZD)-based protocols in treating AWS in MICU. DESIGN: Single-center, pre-post protocol implementation study. SETTING: The setting is a forty-bed MICU in a tertiary-level academic medical center. PATIENTS: We included all patients admitted to the MICU with a primary diagnosis of AWS. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous PB 260 mg followed by 130-mg doses every 15–30 minutes as needed up to 15 mg/kg of ideal body weight versus escalating doses of BZD, to achieve a Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Alcohol Scale-Revised score less than 10. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), in addition to safety measures were the main outcomes of the study. A total of 102 patients were included, 51 in the PB arm and 51 in the BZD arm. There were no differences in baseline clinical characteristics. Half the patients in each group were admitted with delirium tremens. The use of PB-based protocol was associated with 35% reduction in median ICU LOS (1.5 d [interquartile range, 1.2–2.4 d] vs 2.3 d [1.4–4.8 d]; p = 0.009) and 50% reduction in hospital LOS (3 d [2.7–4 d] vs 6 d [4–10 d]; p < 0.001). After adjustment for comorbidities and clinical factors, PB protocol decreased ICU LOS days by 40% (95% CI; 25.8–53.5%). PB group required fewer adjunctive medications to control symptoms (0.7 [0.5–1] vs 2.5 [2–3]; p < 0.001), less need for intubation (1/51 [2%] vs 10/10 [19.6%]; p = 0.023) and less need for physical restraint (19/51 [37.3%] vs 29/51 [56.9%]; p = 0.047), compared with the BZD group. CONCLUSIONS: A protocol utilizing rapidly escalating doses of PB over a short period is an effective and safe alternative to BZD in treating AWS in MICU.","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 4","pages":"e0898"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/de/cc9-5-e0898.PMC10115550.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the efficacy and safety of PB compared with benzodiazepine (BZD)-based protocols in treating AWS in MICU. DESIGN: Single-center, pre-post protocol implementation study. SETTING: The setting is a forty-bed MICU in a tertiary-level academic medical center. PATIENTS: We included all patients admitted to the MICU with a primary diagnosis of AWS. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous PB 260 mg followed by 130-mg doses every 15–30 minutes as needed up to 15 mg/kg of ideal body weight versus escalating doses of BZD, to achieve a Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Alcohol Scale-Revised score less than 10. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), in addition to safety measures were the main outcomes of the study. A total of 102 patients were included, 51 in the PB arm and 51 in the BZD arm. There were no differences in baseline clinical characteristics. Half the patients in each group were admitted with delirium tremens. The use of PB-based protocol was associated with 35% reduction in median ICU LOS (1.5 d [interquartile range, 1.2–2.4 d] vs 2.3 d [1.4–4.8 d]; p = 0.009) and 50% reduction in hospital LOS (3 d [2.7–4 d] vs 6 d [4–10 d]; p < 0.001). After adjustment for comorbidities and clinical factors, PB protocol decreased ICU LOS days by 40% (95% CI; 25.8–53.5%). PB group required fewer adjunctive medications to control symptoms (0.7 [0.5–1] vs 2.5 [2–3]; p < 0.001), less need for intubation (1/51 [2%] vs 10/10 [19.6%]; p = 0.023) and less need for physical restraint (19/51 [37.3%] vs 29/51 [56.9%]; p = 0.047), compared with the BZD group. CONCLUSIONS: A protocol utilizing rapidly escalating doses of PB over a short period is an effective and safe alternative to BZD in treating AWS in MICU.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于苯巴比妥的ICU酒精戒断综合征治疗方案:实施前后研究
我们比较了以苯二氮卓类药物(BZD)为基础的方案治疗重症重症患者AWS的疗效和安全性。设计:单中心,前后协议实施研究。设置:设置在三级学术医疗中心的40个床位的MICU。患者:我们纳入了所有最初诊断为AWS的MICU患者。干预措施:静脉注射PB 260 mg,然后根据需要每15-30分钟给药130 mg,每次给药至理想体重15 mg/kg,而不是逐渐增加BZD剂量,以达到临床研究所戒断评估酒精量表修订评分低于10分。测量和主要结果:ICU和住院时间(LOS),以及安全措施是研究的主要结果。共纳入102例患者,51例在PB组,51例在BZD组。两组的基线临床特征无差异。两组各有一半患者入院时伴有震颤性谵妄。使用基于pbp的方案可使ICU LOS中位数降低35% (1.5 d[四分位数间距,1.2-2.4 d] vs 2.3 d [1.4-4.8 d];p = 0.009),住院LOS降低50% (3 d [2.7-4 d] vs 6 d [4-10 d];P < 0.001)。在调整合并症和临床因素后,PB方案使ICU的LOS天数减少了40% (95% CI;25.8 - -53.5%)。PB组需要较少的辅助药物来控制症状(0.7 [0.5-1]vs 2.5 [2-3]);P < 0.001),插管需求减少(1/51 [2%]vs 10/10 [19.6%];P = 0.023)和较少的身体约束需求(19/51 [37.3%]vs 29/51 [56.9%];p = 0.047),与BZD组比较。结论:短期内快速递增剂量的PB治疗方案是治疗MICU患者AWS的有效且安全的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1