Women as Urologists in Saudi Arabia: Career Choice and Practice Challenges: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Research and Reports in Urology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RRU.S412713
Meshari A Alzahrani, Abdalah Almhmd, Muhammad A Khan, Feras Badriq, Budoor Salman, Zainab Y Aljaziri, Naif Alotaibi, Mohammad Alkhamees, Sulaiman Almutairi, Mohammad Shakil Ahmad, Sultan Alkhateeb
{"title":"Women as Urologists in Saudi Arabia: Career Choice and Practice Challenges: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Meshari A Alzahrani,&nbsp;Abdalah Almhmd,&nbsp;Muhammad A Khan,&nbsp;Feras Badriq,&nbsp;Budoor Salman,&nbsp;Zainab Y Aljaziri,&nbsp;Naif Alotaibi,&nbsp;Mohammad Alkhamees,&nbsp;Sulaiman Almutairi,&nbsp;Mohammad Shakil Ahmad,&nbsp;Sultan Alkhateeb","doi":"10.2147/RRU.S412713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited research on whether women choose urology as a future career. Therefore, we aimed in this study to assess the influencing and challenging factors among female physicians in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We approached 552 female physicians, including 29 (5.2%) urologists and 523 (94.7%) non-urologists. A cross-sectional survey was carried out, which included five sections and 46 items to assess and compare the perspectives of (urologists and non-urologists regarding influencing factors to choose urology, challenges toward applying to urology, and challenges during and after urology residency. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Responses were presented as frequencies and percentages, while associations were studied using the Chi-squared test/Fisher's exact test. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 552 female physicians, 466 completed the survey. The survey items compared urologists and non-urologists among female physicians. Among both cohorts, the most influencing factors in choosing urology were the diversity of practice and urological procedures (p =0.002, p<0.001). There were no social barriers or challenges when applying for urology residency (p<0.001). Overall, the majority of female urologists reported a high level of agreement that they have more time to work at the clinic (55.2%), they are satisfied as they are currently being urologists (75.8%), satisfied with their current lifestyle (72.6%). They would choose urology again as a future career (58.6%). Non-urologist female physicians 326 (74.6%) think they are more likely to have experienced gender discrimination than urologists 15 (51.7%) (p<0.001). Female urologists were less likely to face social barriers when applying for urology residency than non-urologists (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As urologists, we must understand women's struggles, such as gender discrimination, a lack of academic advancement, and a lack of mentorship. To foster women's careers in urology, we must understand their unique needs, provide adequate mentorship, exterminate gender discrimination bias, and improve mentorship.</p>","PeriodicalId":21008,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/67/rru-15-273.PMC10314780.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S412713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited research on whether women choose urology as a future career. Therefore, we aimed in this study to assess the influencing and challenging factors among female physicians in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: We approached 552 female physicians, including 29 (5.2%) urologists and 523 (94.7%) non-urologists. A cross-sectional survey was carried out, which included five sections and 46 items to assess and compare the perspectives of (urologists and non-urologists regarding influencing factors to choose urology, challenges toward applying to urology, and challenges during and after urology residency. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Responses were presented as frequencies and percentages, while associations were studied using the Chi-squared test/Fisher's exact test. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Out of 552 female physicians, 466 completed the survey. The survey items compared urologists and non-urologists among female physicians. Among both cohorts, the most influencing factors in choosing urology were the diversity of practice and urological procedures (p =0.002, p<0.001). There were no social barriers or challenges when applying for urology residency (p<0.001). Overall, the majority of female urologists reported a high level of agreement that they have more time to work at the clinic (55.2%), they are satisfied as they are currently being urologists (75.8%), satisfied with their current lifestyle (72.6%). They would choose urology again as a future career (58.6%). Non-urologist female physicians 326 (74.6%) think they are more likely to have experienced gender discrimination than urologists 15 (51.7%) (p<0.001). Female urologists were less likely to face social barriers when applying for urology residency than non-urologists (p<0.001).

Conclusion: As urologists, we must understand women's struggles, such as gender discrimination, a lack of academic advancement, and a lack of mentorship. To foster women's careers in urology, we must understand their unique needs, provide adequate mentorship, exterminate gender discrimination bias, and improve mentorship.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯女性泌尿科医生:职业选择和实践挑战:一项比较横断面研究。
背景:关于女性是否选择泌尿外科作为未来职业的研究有限。因此,我们在本研究中旨在评估沙特阿拉伯女医生的影响因素和挑战因素。方法:对552名女医师进行调查,其中泌尿科29名(5.2%),非泌尿科523名(94.7%)。采用横断面调查法,分为5个部分,共46个项目,评估比较泌尿科医师与非泌尿科医师对泌尿科选择的影响因素、应用泌尿科面临的挑战以及泌尿科住院期间和住院后面临的挑战。采用SPSS软件进行统计分析。反应以频率和百分比表示,而使用卡方检验/Fisher精确检验研究关联。p值≤0.05为显著性。结果:552名女医师中,有466名完成了调查。调查项目比较了女医师中泌尿科医师和非泌尿科医师的情况。在这两个队列中,选择泌尿外科的最大影响因素是实践的多样性和泌尿外科手术(p =0.002)。结论:作为泌尿科医生,我们必须了解女性的斗争,如性别歧视,缺乏学术进步,缺乏指导。为了促进女性在泌尿外科的职业发展,我们必须了解她们的独特需求,提供足够的指导,消除性别歧视偏见,并改善指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Urology
Research and Reports in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Reports in Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease Investigation and treatment of urological disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Fucoidan Ameliorates Testosterone-Induced Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in Rats. Bladder Pain Syndrome (BPS): A Comprehensive Review of Treatment Strategies and Management Approaches. An Evaluation of the Postvoid Residual Urine Volume in Acute Stroke Patients. General Obesity and Prostate Cancer in Relation to Abdominal Obesity and Ethnic Groups: A US Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Incidence and Recurrence of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1