Comparison of ileocecal resection and right hemicolectomy in the surgical treatment of complicated appendicitis.

Hamdi Taner Turgut, Ozkan Subasi
{"title":"Comparison of ileocecal resection and right hemicolectomy in the surgical treatment of complicated appendicitis.","authors":"Hamdi Taner Turgut,&nbsp;Ozkan Subasi","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2023.83357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simple appendectomy with a complicated appendicitis diagnosis could prove difficult, sometimes requiring ex-tended resection. Hence, we aimed to compare two procedures that are preferred for extended resection, ileocecal resection, and right hemicolectomy, in terms of patients' demographic data, preoperative laboratory values (white blood cell [WBC], Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [N/L], C-reactive protein [CRP]), operation times, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and 1-month mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent extended resection with the diagnosis of complicated appen-dicitis in our clinic from February 2015 to December 2020. We divided the patients into two groups those who underwent right hemicolectomy and those who underwent ileocecal resection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 55 patients who underwent extended resection with the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, 32 (58.1%) underwent right hemicolectomy and 23 underwent ileocecal resection (41.8%). The groups did not differ statistically significantly in terms of demographic characteristics, preoperative laboratory values (WBC, N/L, CRP), Clavien-Dindo classification scores, mean hospital stay, or 1-month mortality rates (p>0.005). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of operation time (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ileocecal resection is a safe procedure for patients diagnosed with complicated appendicitis who are scheduled for extended resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":49398,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery","volume":"29 6","pages":"705-709"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/f7/TJTES-29-705.PMC10315939.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.83357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simple appendectomy with a complicated appendicitis diagnosis could prove difficult, sometimes requiring ex-tended resection. Hence, we aimed to compare two procedures that are preferred for extended resection, ileocecal resection, and right hemicolectomy, in terms of patients' demographic data, preoperative laboratory values (white blood cell [WBC], Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [N/L], C-reactive protein [CRP]), operation times, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and 1-month mortality rates.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent extended resection with the diagnosis of complicated appen-dicitis in our clinic from February 2015 to December 2020. We divided the patients into two groups those who underwent right hemicolectomy and those who underwent ileocecal resection.

Results: Among the 55 patients who underwent extended resection with the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, 32 (58.1%) underwent right hemicolectomy and 23 underwent ileocecal resection (41.8%). The groups did not differ statistically significantly in terms of demographic characteristics, preoperative laboratory values (WBC, N/L, CRP), Clavien-Dindo classification scores, mean hospital stay, or 1-month mortality rates (p>0.005). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of operation time (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Ileocecal resection is a safe procedure for patients diagnosed with complicated appendicitis who are scheduled for extended resection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回盲切除与右半结肠切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的比较。
背景:简单阑尾切除术合并复杂的阑尾炎诊断可能是困难的,有时需要扩大切除。因此,我们的目的是比较患者的人口学数据、术前实验室数据(白细胞[WBC]、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值[N/L]、c反应蛋白[CRP])、手术时间、术后并发症、住院时间和1个月死亡率,回肠盲切除和右半结肠切除术这两种首选手术方式。方法:回顾性分析2015年2月至2020年12月在我诊所诊断为复杂阑尾炎的患者行延长切除术。我们将患者分为两组,一组接受右半结肠切除术,另一组接受回盲切除术。结果:55例诊断为复杂性阑尾炎行扩大切除术的患者中,32例(58.1%)行右半结肠切除术,23例(41.8%)行回盲切除术。两组在人口学特征、术前实验室值(WBC、N/L、CRP)、Clavien-Dindo分类评分、平均住院时间或1个月死亡率方面无统计学差异(p>0.005)。但两组间手术时间差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:对于诊断为复杂阑尾炎且计划延长手术时间的患者,回盲切除是一种安全的手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (TJTES) is an official publication of the Turkish Association of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. It is a double-blind and peer-reviewed periodical that considers for publication clinical and experimental studies, case reports, technical contributions, and letters to the editor. Scope of the journal covers the trauma and emergency surgery. Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in their fields in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent reviewer to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions.
期刊最新文献
Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye. The comparison of the suture materials on intestinal anastomotic healing: an experimental study. Research of Importance of Thiol, CRP and Lactate in Diagnosing Mesenteric Ischemia At An Early Stage: Animal Model. Trauma in pregnancy: An analysis of the adverse perinatal outcomes and the injury severity score. Is diagnostic laparoscopy necessary in the management of left thoracoabdominal stab wounds?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1