The SPEER: An interprofessional team behavior rubric to optimize geriatric clinical care.

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1080/02701960.2021.2002854
Shelley B Bhattacharya, Dory Sabata, Heather Gibbs, Stephen Jernigan, Nicholas Marchello, Denise Zwahlen, Frances M Yang, Rajib K Bhattacharya, Crystal Burkhardt
{"title":"The SPEER: An interprofessional team behavior rubric to optimize geriatric clinical care.","authors":"Shelley B Bhattacharya,&nbsp;Dory Sabata,&nbsp;Heather Gibbs,&nbsp;Stephen Jernigan,&nbsp;Nicholas Marchello,&nbsp;Denise Zwahlen,&nbsp;Frances M Yang,&nbsp;Rajib K Bhattacharya,&nbsp;Crystal Burkhardt","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2021.2002854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Geriatric patients with complex health care needs can benefit from interprofessional (IP) care; however, a major gap in health professional education is determining how to prepare future providers for IP collaboration. Effective IP team behavior assessment tools are needed to teach, implement, and evaluate IP practice skills. After review of IP evaluation tools, the Standardized Patient Encounter Evaluation Rubric (SPEER) was created to evaluate team dynamics in IP practice sites.Independent sample t-tests between faculty and learner SPEER scores showed learners scored themselves 15 points higher than their faculty scores (<i>p</i> < .001). Cronbach's α showed high internal consistency (α = 0.91). Paired t-tests found that learners identified improvements in the team's ability to address the patient's education needs and to allow the patients to voice their expectations. Faculty identified improvements in the teams' ability to make recommendations. Faculty evaluations of learner teams showed improvements in raw ratings on all but two items. Qualitative data analysis for emergent themes showed learners desired team functioning feedback and how teamwork could improve to provide optimal IP care.In conclusion, the SPEER can help faculty and learners identify growth in their teams' ability to perform key IP skills in clinical sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":"44 2","pages":"316-328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2021.2002854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Geriatric patients with complex health care needs can benefit from interprofessional (IP) care; however, a major gap in health professional education is determining how to prepare future providers for IP collaboration. Effective IP team behavior assessment tools are needed to teach, implement, and evaluate IP practice skills. After review of IP evaluation tools, the Standardized Patient Encounter Evaluation Rubric (SPEER) was created to evaluate team dynamics in IP practice sites.Independent sample t-tests between faculty and learner SPEER scores showed learners scored themselves 15 points higher than their faculty scores (p < .001). Cronbach's α showed high internal consistency (α = 0.91). Paired t-tests found that learners identified improvements in the team's ability to address the patient's education needs and to allow the patients to voice their expectations. Faculty identified improvements in the teams' ability to make recommendations. Faculty evaluations of learner teams showed improvements in raw ratings on all but two items. Qualitative data analysis for emergent themes showed learners desired team functioning feedback and how teamwork could improve to provide optimal IP care.In conclusion, the SPEER can help faculty and learners identify growth in their teams' ability to perform key IP skills in clinical sites.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SPEER:优化老年临床护理的跨专业团队行为准则。
有复杂卫生保健需求的老年患者可以从跨专业护理中受益;然而,卫生专业教育中的一个主要差距正在决定如何为知识产权合作的未来提供者做好准备。需要有效的知识产权团队行为评估工具来教授、实施和评估知识产权实践技能。在审查了知识产权评估工具之后,创建了标准化患者遭遇评估准则(SPEER)来评估知识产权实践场所的团队动态。教师和学习者SPEER分数之间的独立样本t检验显示,学习者给自己的分数比教师给自己的分数高15分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing trauma-informed care for older veterans: clinician perspectives on trauma practices and curricular needs. Interprofessional health care students' confidence toward addressing the social determinants of health for older adults through telehealth. "I feel more in control of my learning experience:" ungrading as an empowering approach to competency-based gerontological teaching and learning. Enhancing the diversity and productivity of scientists in aging research: contributions of the Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research, 2018-2023. Enhancing trauma-informed care preparation through life story work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1