Early Experience With Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Patients With COVID-19 Admitted to a Community Hospital.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1177/87551225221104323
Kyle Manning, Chris Whitman, Lindsey Hohmann, Jessica Tubbs, Darrell Childress, Jose A Leon de la Rocha
{"title":"Early Experience With Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Patients With COVID-19 Admitted to a Community Hospital.","authors":"Kyle Manning, Chris Whitman, Lindsey Hohmann, Jessica Tubbs, Darrell Childress, Jose A Leon de la Rocha","doi":"10.1177/87551225221104323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/objective:</b> The efficacy of interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitors in hospitalized patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonitis is unclear. <b>Method:</b> This retrospective, observational cohort study included patients hospitalized at a community hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia from March 2020 to May 2020. All patients were treated with standard of care (SOC), and a nonrandomly selected subset of patients also received an IL-6 inhibitor. The primary outcome was clinical response, defined as an improvement of at least 2 categories relative to baseline on a 7-category ordinal scale up to hospital discharge or 30 days. In adjusted analyses, logistic and linear regression models were conducted, controlling for covariates of hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) care, ICU LOS, gender, age, race, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. <b>Results:</b> A total of 133 patients met inclusion criteria. In all, 30 patients received an IL-6 inhibitor plus SOC. There was no statistical difference in clinical outcome between groups as 76.7% in the SOC alone group and 70.0% in the IL-6 inhibitor group met the defined endpoints for clinical response (<i>P</i> = 0.477). In the adjusted analysis, patients treated with IL-6 inhibitors were approximately 4 times more likely to meet the primary endpoint compared with patients with SOC alone (adj. odds ratio = 4.325; <i>P</i> = 0.038, 95% confidence interval = [1.09-17.18]). <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared with SOC alone, IL-6 inhibitors were not associated with a significant clinical response. However, after adjusting for covariates, this study suggests that the initiation of IL-6 inhibitors in patients with early COVID-19 pneumonitis before progression to the ICU may be associated with improved clinical status.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9420917/pdf/10.1177_87551225221104323.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221104323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: The efficacy of interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitors in hospitalized patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonitis is unclear. Method: This retrospective, observational cohort study included patients hospitalized at a community hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia from March 2020 to May 2020. All patients were treated with standard of care (SOC), and a nonrandomly selected subset of patients also received an IL-6 inhibitor. The primary outcome was clinical response, defined as an improvement of at least 2 categories relative to baseline on a 7-category ordinal scale up to hospital discharge or 30 days. In adjusted analyses, logistic and linear regression models were conducted, controlling for covariates of hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) care, ICU LOS, gender, age, race, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results: A total of 133 patients met inclusion criteria. In all, 30 patients received an IL-6 inhibitor plus SOC. There was no statistical difference in clinical outcome between groups as 76.7% in the SOC alone group and 70.0% in the IL-6 inhibitor group met the defined endpoints for clinical response (P = 0.477). In the adjusted analysis, patients treated with IL-6 inhibitors were approximately 4 times more likely to meet the primary endpoint compared with patients with SOC alone (adj. odds ratio = 4.325; P = 0.038, 95% confidence interval = [1.09-17.18]). Conclusions: Compared with SOC alone, IL-6 inhibitors were not associated with a significant clinical response. However, after adjusting for covariates, this study suggests that the initiation of IL-6 inhibitors in patients with early COVID-19 pneumonitis before progression to the ICU may be associated with improved clinical status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一家社区医院收治的 COVID-19 患者使用白细胞介素-6 受体拮抗剂的早期经验。
背景/目的:白细胞介素-6(IL-6)抑制剂对重症冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)肺炎住院患者的疗效尚不明确。研究方法:这项回顾性观察队列研究纳入了 2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 5 月期间在一家社区医院住院的 COVID-19 肺炎患者。所有患者均接受了标准护理(SOC)治疗,非随机选择的一部分患者还接受了IL-6抑制剂治疗。主要结果是临床反应,即在出院前或 30 天内,在 7 类序数量表中与基线相比至少改善 2 类。在调整分析中,采用了逻辑和线性回归模型,并控制了住院时间(LOS)、重症监护室(ICU)护理、ICU LOS、性别、年龄、种族和查尔森合并症指数等协变量。结果:共有 133 名患者符合纳入标准。共有30名患者接受了IL-6抑制剂加SOC治疗。单用 SOC 组和 IL-6 抑制剂组的临床结果没有统计学差异,分别有 76.7% 和 70.0% 的患者达到了规定的临床反应终点(P = 0.477)。在调整后的分析中,接受IL-6抑制剂治疗的患者达到主要终点的几率是单纯SOC治疗患者的约4倍(调整后的几率比=4.325;P=0.038,95%置信区间=[1.09-17.18])。结论与单用 SOC 相比,IL-6 抑制剂与显著的临床反应无关。然而,在对协变量进行调整后,本研究表明,早期 COVID-19 肺炎患者在进入重症监护室前开始使用 IL-6 抑制剂可能与临床状况的改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Apixaban Use in Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease. Phenobarbital Dosing for the Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: A Review of the Literature. Effectiveness of an Aerosol Inhalation Monitor in an Ambulatory Primary Care Pharmacy Clinic Implementation of Virtual Interactive Cases for Pharmacy Education: A Single-Center Experience. The Role of Telepharmacy in the Delivery of Clinical Pharmacy Services Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1