Methodological and reporting quality of qualitative evidence in the field of lower limb orthoses: a systematic review.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the methodological and reporting quality of qualitative studies conducted in the field of lower limb orthoses (LLOs). The following electronic databases were searched from inception to 2022: PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, WoS, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and RehabData. Two authors independently screened and selected the potential studies. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programs qualitative checklist. In addition, the reporting quality of included studies was assessed using the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) tool. The mean methodological quality score of included studies was 8 (from min = 2 to max = 9.5), and most of the studies had a score of more than 7.5. However, SRQR findings revealed that the overall reporting quality of included studies was not desirable in that the mean score was about 15.44 (from min = 6 to max = 19.5) out of 21. In total, the methodological quality of qualitative studies published in the field of LLOs was moderate. Further, the adherence of these studies to available reporting guidelines was unsatisfactory. As a result, when designing, performing, and reporting qualitative investigations, authors should pay more attention to these criteria.