Effectiveness and safety of prophylactic phototherapy to prevent jaundice in premature newborns: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Child Health Care Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1177/13674935231187716
Luis A Lovera, Javier Torres, Herney A García-Perdomo
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of prophylactic phototherapy to prevent jaundice in premature newborns: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Luis A Lovera,&nbsp;Javier Torres,&nbsp;Herney A García-Perdomo","doi":"10.1177/13674935231187716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic phototherapy compared with conventional phototherapy for the prevention of neonatal jaundice. We included clinical trials comparing prophylactic phototherapy to conventional phototherapy to prevent jaundice in premature newborns. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, LILACS, Central, and others. The statistical analysis was performed in RevMan (Review Manager 5.3). Outcomes were analyzed according to the type of variable: risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD). A random effects model was used due to heterogeneity. We reported results in forest plots. Risk of bias was evaluated, and a sensitivity analysis was made. 1127 articles were found, and six studies (2332 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Five studies evaluated the need for exchange transfusion as the primary outcome RD -0.01, 95% CI [-0.05 to 0.03]. One study evaluated bilirubin encephalopathy RD -0.04, 95% CI [-0.09 to 0.00]. Five studies evaluated the duration of phototherapy, MD 38.47, 95% CI [1.28 to 55.67]. Four studies evaluated levels of bilirubin (MD -1.23, 95% CI [-2.25 to -0.21]. Two studies evaluated mortality, RD 0.01, 95% CI [-0.03 to 0.04]. As a conclusion, compared to conventional phototherapy, prophylactic phototherapy decreases the last measured level of bilirubin, as well as the probability of neurodevelopmental disturbances. However, it increases phototherapy duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":54388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935231187716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To determine the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic phototherapy compared with conventional phototherapy for the prevention of neonatal jaundice. We included clinical trials comparing prophylactic phototherapy to conventional phototherapy to prevent jaundice in premature newborns. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, LILACS, Central, and others. The statistical analysis was performed in RevMan (Review Manager 5.3). Outcomes were analyzed according to the type of variable: risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD). A random effects model was used due to heterogeneity. We reported results in forest plots. Risk of bias was evaluated, and a sensitivity analysis was made. 1127 articles were found, and six studies (2332 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Five studies evaluated the need for exchange transfusion as the primary outcome RD -0.01, 95% CI [-0.05 to 0.03]. One study evaluated bilirubin encephalopathy RD -0.04, 95% CI [-0.09 to 0.00]. Five studies evaluated the duration of phototherapy, MD 38.47, 95% CI [1.28 to 55.67]. Four studies evaluated levels of bilirubin (MD -1.23, 95% CI [-2.25 to -0.21]. Two studies evaluated mortality, RD 0.01, 95% CI [-0.03 to 0.04]. As a conclusion, compared to conventional phototherapy, prophylactic phototherapy decreases the last measured level of bilirubin, as well as the probability of neurodevelopmental disturbances. However, it increases phototherapy duration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防性光疗预防早产儿黄疸的有效性和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:比较预防性光疗与常规光疗预防新生儿黄疸的有效性和安全性。我们纳入了比较预防性光疗和常规光疗预防早产儿黄疸的临床试验。我们搜索了Embase、MEDLINE、LILACS、Central等。在RevMan (Review Manager 5.3)软件中进行统计分析。结果根据变量类型进行分析:风险差异(RD)和平均差异(MD)。由于异质性,采用随机效应模型。我们报告了森林样地的结果。评估偏倚风险,并进行敏感性分析。共发现1127篇文章,6项研究(2332例患者)纳入meta分析。5项研究将换血需求评估为主要结局(RD -0.01, 95% CI[-0.05至0.03])。一项研究评估胆红素脑病RD为-0.04,95% CI[-0.09至0.00]。5项研究评估光疗持续时间,MD为38.47,95% CI[1.28 ~ 55.67]。四项研究评估了胆红素水平(MD -1.23, 95% CI[-2.25至-0.21])。两项研究评估死亡率,相对危险度为0.01,95% CI[-0.03 ~ 0.04]。综上所述,与常规光疗相比,预防性光疗降低了最后测量的胆红素水平,以及神经发育障碍的可能性。然而,它增加了光疗时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Child Health Care
Journal of Child Health Care NURSING-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child Health Care is a broad ranging, international, professionally-oriented, interdisciplinary and peer reviewed journal. It focuses on issues related to the health and health care of neonates, children, young people and their families, including areas such as illness, disability, complex needs, well-being, quality of life and mental health care in a diverse range of settings. The Journal of Child Health Care publishes original theoretical, empirical and review papers which have application to a wide variety of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Why are we still doing sucrose trials for newborns? Experiences of siblings and parents of children with congenital heart disease and exploration of siblings' support needs. Mothers' experience seeking healthcare advice for their unsettled infants in Victoria, Australia. Factors that support children and young people to express their views and to have them heard in healthcare: An inductive qualitative content analysis. Goals of Morbidity and Mortality meetings in paediatric acute care. A qualitative case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1