Comparative analysis of craniofacial asymmetry in subjects with and without symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders: a cross-sectional study.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.3.125
Anita Pradhan, Preeti Bhattacharya, Shivani Singh, Anil Kumar Chandna, Ankur Gupta, Ravi Bhandari
{"title":"Comparative analysis of craniofacial asymmetry in subjects with and without symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Anita Pradhan,&nbsp;Preeti Bhattacharya,&nbsp;Shivani Singh,&nbsp;Anil Kumar Chandna,&nbsp;Ankur Gupta,&nbsp;Ravi Bhandari","doi":"10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.3.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to quantify and compare craniofacial asymmetry in subjects with and without symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 126 adult subjects were categorized into two groups (63 with a TMDs and 63 without a TMDs), based on detection of symptoms using the Temporomandibular Joint Disorder-Diagnostic Index (TMD-DI) questionnaire. Posteroanterior cephalograms of each subject were traced manually and 17 linear and angular measurements were analyzed. Craniofacial asymmetry was quantified by calculating the asymmetry index (AI) of bilateral parameters for both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra- and intergroup comparisons were analyzed using independent <i>t</i>-test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively, with a <i>P</i><0.05 considered statistically significant. An AI for each linear and angular bilateral parameter was calculated; higher asymmetry was found in TMD-positive patients compared with TMD-negative patients. An intergroup comparison of AIs found highly significant differences for the parameters of antegonial notch to horizontal plane distance, jugular point to horizontal plane distance, antegonial notch to menton distance, antegonial notch to vertical plane distance, condylion to vertical plane distance, and angle formed by vertical plane, O point and antegonial notch. Significant deviation of the menton distance from the facial midline was also evident.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater facial asymmetry was seen in the TMD-positive group compared with the TMD-negative group. The mandibular region was characterized by asymmetries of greater magnitude compared with the maxilla. Patients with facial asymmetry often require management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathology to achieve a stable, functional, and esthetic result. Ignoring the TMJ during treatment or failing to provide proper management of the TMJ and performing only orthognathic surgery may result in worsening of TMJ-associated symptoms (jaw dysfunction and pain) and re-occurrence of asymmetry and malocclusion. Assessments of facial asymmetry should take into account TMJ disorders to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/85/jkaoms-49-3-125.PMC10318310.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.3.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to quantify and compare craniofacial asymmetry in subjects with and without symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs).

Materials and methods: A total of 126 adult subjects were categorized into two groups (63 with a TMDs and 63 without a TMDs), based on detection of symptoms using the Temporomandibular Joint Disorder-Diagnostic Index (TMD-DI) questionnaire. Posteroanterior cephalograms of each subject were traced manually and 17 linear and angular measurements were analyzed. Craniofacial asymmetry was quantified by calculating the asymmetry index (AI) of bilateral parameters for both groups.

Results: Intra- and intergroup comparisons were analyzed using independent t-test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively, with a P<0.05 considered statistically significant. An AI for each linear and angular bilateral parameter was calculated; higher asymmetry was found in TMD-positive patients compared with TMD-negative patients. An intergroup comparison of AIs found highly significant differences for the parameters of antegonial notch to horizontal plane distance, jugular point to horizontal plane distance, antegonial notch to menton distance, antegonial notch to vertical plane distance, condylion to vertical plane distance, and angle formed by vertical plane, O point and antegonial notch. Significant deviation of the menton distance from the facial midline was also evident.

Conclusion: Greater facial asymmetry was seen in the TMD-positive group compared with the TMD-negative group. The mandibular region was characterized by asymmetries of greater magnitude compared with the maxilla. Patients with facial asymmetry often require management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathology to achieve a stable, functional, and esthetic result. Ignoring the TMJ during treatment or failing to provide proper management of the TMJ and performing only orthognathic surgery may result in worsening of TMJ-associated symptoms (jaw dysfunction and pain) and re-occurrence of asymmetry and malocclusion. Assessments of facial asymmetry should take into account TMJ disorders to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有和无颞下颌关节紊乱症状的受试者颅面不对称的比较分析:一项横断面研究。
目的:本研究的目的是量化和比较有和没有颞下颌关节疾病(TMDs)症状的受试者颅面不对称。材料与方法:采用颞下颌关节疾病诊断指数(TMD-DI)问卷,将126名成人受试者分为两组(63名有颞下颌关节疾病和63名无颞下颌关节疾病)。每个受试者的后前位脑电图都是手工追踪的,并分析了17个线性和角度测量值。通过计算两组双侧参数的不对称指数(AI)来量化颅面不对称。结果:组内比较和组间比较分别采用独立t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验,p检验。结论:与tmd阴性组相比,tmd阳性组面部不对称性更大。与上颌骨相比,下颌区域的不对称程度更大。面部不对称的患者通常需要对颞下颌关节(TMJ)进行病理处理,以获得稳定、功能和美观的结果。在治疗过程中忽视TMJ或未能对TMJ进行适当的管理而只进行正颌手术可能会导致TMJ相关症状(颌功能障碍和疼痛)的恶化以及不对称和错颌的再次发生。面部不对称的评估应考虑颞下颌关节紊乱,以提高诊断准确性和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg) is the official journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. This bimonthly journal offers high-quality original articles, case series study, case reports, collective or current reviews, technical notes, brief communications or correspondences, and others related to regenerative medicine, dentoalveolar surgery, dental implant surgery, head and neck cancer, aesthetic facial surgery/orthognathic surgery, facial injuries, temporomandibular joint disorders, orofacial disease, and oral pathology. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg is of interest to oral and maxillofacial surgeons and dental practitioners as well as others who are interested in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of postsurgical relapse patterns in one-jaw surgery: skeletal factors and clustering analysis in patients with mandibular setback. Author's reply to the letter to the editor of Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Comment on "An unusual presentation of peripheral ameloblastoma in the maxilla". Efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy on temporomandibular disorder: a retrospective study. Exploring the role of angiogenesis in fibrosis and malignant transformation in oral submucous fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1